|
Elbridge Colby
@
ElbridgeColby
|
|
Director of Defense Program @CNAS. Formerly Pentagon, National Defense Strategy, inter alia. cnas.org/people/elbridg… Views expressed my own.
|
|
|
1,757
ट्वीट
|
658
फ़ॉलो कर रहे हैं
|
2,494
फ़ॉलोअर्स
|
| ट्वीट |
| Elbridge Colby ने रीट्विट किया | ||
|
David Santoro
@DavidSantoro1
|
14 घं॰ |
|
And that one: tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
|
||
|
||
| Elbridge Colby ने रीट्विट किया | ||
|
Eric Sayers
@DEricSayers
|
14 घं॰ |
|
I would add this 2015 monograph to the list. cfr.org/report/revisin…
|
||
|
|
||
| Elbridge Colby ने रीट्विट किया | ||
|
ORF
@orfonline
|
15 अक्तू॰ |
|
The era of “understanding” Chinese civilisation and accommodating its myriad “manifestations” in today’s Communist Party⎯controlled China — a line pursued by the Chinese and Henry Kissinger — is formally over.
From Seema Sirohi: goo.gl/dazjLe
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Elbridge Colby
@ElbridgeColby
|
16 घं॰ |
|
Historic article helping usher in crucial shift on US policy toward China @elyratner @DEricSayers @niubi @eosnos @CNASdc @dankurtzphelan twitter.com/ForeignAffairs…
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Elbridge Colby
@ElbridgeColby
|
18 अक्तू॰ |
|
Hugh White is right that, to deter a rising China, US ultimately needs to be prepared to fight a limited nuclear war. He is wrong that we won't have the resolve to do it. I lay out the case for how we can meet that standard here. @ashleytownshend @Rory_Medcalf @kenj0126 @rdyn51 twitter.com/ForeignAffairs…
|
||
|
|
||
| Elbridge Colby ने रीट्विट किया | ||
|
Ian Easton
@Ian_M_Easton
|
17 अक्तू॰ |
|
Damn that's good reading! I just finished it and shared w/ @Project2049 team. Thank you to @ElbridgeColby & congrats to @ForeignAffairs @CNASdc for this remarkable article. Highly recommend spending the time to read it, discuss it, and think about it. cnas.org/publications/c… pic.twitter.com/4U8ikrQFpO
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Elbridge Colby
@ElbridgeColby
|
17 अक्तू॰ |
|
Bingo: "We have lots of legacy, middleweight forces that are too expensive for low-end conflict, and ill-suited for high-end combat." These are the types of forces that should be on the chopping block, and now. twitter.com/ToddHarrisonDC…
|
||
|
|
||
| Elbridge Colby ने रीट्विट किया | ||
|
Ely Ratner
@elyratner
|
17 अक्तू॰ |
|
“A certain kind of Cold War thinking may be just what Washington and its allies need.”
@ElbridgeColby in November/December edition of @ForeignAffairs offers a nuclear strategy for new era of great power competition. foreignaffairs.com/articles/china…
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Elbridge Colby
@ElbridgeColby
|
17 अक्तू॰ |
|
Ok...And??? I actually quoted the Perry line in the piece. How is it rational for anyone to blow up the world over a limited use of nuclear weapons? Deterrence isn't that easy.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Elbridge Colby
@ElbridgeColby
|
17 अक्तू॰ |
|
Sure thing: I’d cut non nuclear forces irrelevant to high end fight and expensive for low end. Divide isn’t between nuke vs conventional but rather high low mix vs (legacy) middleweight force @ToddHarrisonDC @paul_scharre @SusannaVBlume twitter.com/brianweeden/st…
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Elbridge Colby
@ElbridgeColby
|
17 अक्तू॰ |
|
I think you’re perfectly validating my characterization of the tremendous vulnerabilities of the dove position in the article. twitter.com/TomCollina/sta…
|
||
|
|
||
| Elbridge Colby ने रीट्विट किया | ||
|
CNAS
@CNASdc
|
17 अक्तू॰ |
|
Russia and China have both "developed military forces ideally suited to fight and defeat the United States in a future war. And modern, mobile nuclear capabilities are a key part of their strategies." - @ElbridgeColby writes for @ForeignAffairs: bit.ly/2yImuwY
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Elbridge Colby
@ElbridgeColby
|
17 अक्तू॰ |
|
Indeed exactly who I’m arguing against! That’s the broad debate that needs to be picked up. twitter.com/darylgkimball/…
|
||
|
|
||
| Elbridge Colby ने रीट्विट किया | ||
|
Foreign Affairs
@ForeignAffairs
|
17 अक्तू॰ |
|
Washington didn’t need much of a nuclear strategy immediately after the Cold War, writes @ElbridgeColby, but the return of great-power competition calls for a rethink.
trib.al/kHLLO2q
|
||
|
|
||
| Elbridge Colby ने रीट्विट किया | ||
|
Jacquelyn Schneider
@JackieGSchneid
|
17 अक्तू॰ |
|
This is the best @ForeignAffairs issue I have read in a really long time--important for scholars, practitioners, and regional experts. Featuring @ProfTalmadge @NinaTannenwald @ElbridgeColby, Scott Sagan, Olga Oliker, and John Mueller. #donukesmatter
foreignaffairs.com/issues/2018/97…
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Elbridge Colby
@ElbridgeColby
|
17 अक्तू॰ |
|
Was looking at “slightly” part... twitter.com/NarangVipin/st…
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Elbridge Colby
@ElbridgeColby
|
17 अक्तू॰ |
|
Don’t have hangover of WWII and threat of Soviet boot never going away to make the Mort Halperin description of NATO defense strategy seem persuasive enough to Moscow 2/ twitter.com/narangvipin/st…
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Elbridge Colby
@ElbridgeColby
|
17 अक्तू॰ |
|
Agreed on upshot but might not the fact that it could indeed be limited make it more likely? Soviets couldn’t figure out a way to risk/start a war in Europe that wouldn’t lead to Armageddon. Not so anymore and threats to blow up the world are even harder to make credible now 1/ twitter.com/narangvipin/st…
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Elbridge Colby
@ElbridgeColby
|
16 अक्तू॰ |
|
Btw latter piece is by @Alex_agvg - superb analyst on nuclear and strategic issues. Stay tuned for more from him! twitter.com/ElbridgeColby/…
|
||
|
|
||
| Elbridge Colby ने रीट्विट किया | ||
|
|
Foreign Affairs
@ForeignAffairs
|
16 अक्तू॰ |
|
China and Russia have developed military forces ideally suited to fight and defeat the United States in a future war, and modern, mobile nuclear capabilities are a key part of their strategies, writes @ElbridgeColby.
trib.al/8kqyaQS
|
||
|
|
||