A basic result in analysis states that convergence of a sequence implies its boundedness. I was wondering: what's wrong with $x_n = 1/(n-a)$ for some $a \in N$? This sequence is convergent to $0$, but $x_a$ is unbounded. What am I missing here? Thanks!

  • 7
    How do you define $x_{a}$? If you plug $n=a$ you get $x_{a}=1/0$. – Prism 6 hours ago
  • 2
    $x_a$ is undefined so that is not a sequence at all. – fleablood 6 hours ago
up vote 9 down vote accepted

The result is saying that any convergence sequence in real numbers is bounded. The sequence that you have constructed is not a sequence in real numbers, it is a sequence in extended real numbers if you take the convention that $1/0=\infty$.

  • Okay, I see. So a sequence of real numbers can be unbounded only asymptotically? – Tobia Marcucci 6 hours ago
  • I don't understand your question? What is asymptotically? – user284331 6 hours ago
  • I mean, if you really want to say a sequence of real numbers, then you have to make sure all terms are defined. But if you take the convention that $1/0=\infty$, it is not a sequence of real numbers because $\infty$ is not in the system of real numbers. – user284331 6 hours ago
  • I mean that, if you rule out all the cases like the one I asked about, an element of a sequence can be unbounded only as $n$ goes to infinity (e.g. $x_n=n$), and it's never the case that a sequence is unbounded because one of its elements $x_n$ is unbounded with $n$ finite. – Tobia Marcucci 6 hours ago
  • 1
    Of course, for a finite set of real numbers must be bounded, just take their maxima. – user284331 6 hours ago

Your sequence $\{ 1/(n-a)\}_1^\infty $ is not defined at $n=a$ if $a$ is a positive integer.

Thus it is not a sequence at all.

for example $$\{ 1/(n-5)\} _1^\infty = \{ -1/4,-1/3,-1/2, -1, ?, 1,...\}$$

A real sequence is nothing but a function $$f:\mathbb{N}\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}$$ One often writes for example $x_n$ instead of $f(n)$ etc.

So, your "sequence" is not defined on $\mathbb{N}$ but on $\mathbb{N}\setminus\{a\}$.

But nicely enough, if you remove the "undefined member" by setting $x_a := r$ to an arbitrary real number $r$, you get a convergent sequence which is bounded.

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.