Start using CODE_OWNERS.TXT #5027
|
@jkotas - Jan I nominated you as the fallback person who will help issue filers locate maintainers if they aren't currently listed. Is that OK or is there a better nominee? |
|
@richlander @mikem8361 @kspawa - fyi, you guys are all mentioned in the proposed CODE_OWNERS.TXT |
Sounds good. |
1 of 8 checks passed
|
cc @dotnet/jit-contrib It may be useful to add RyuJIT maintainers to this file as well. |
|
@myungjoo It may be useful to add you or somebody from your team as Linux ARM port maintainer. |
|
@jkotas You may include me. Are we going to make it a rule that there will be one person per topic? or are we going to allow multiple co-maintainers on a topic? (as a secondary or emergency contact. we often do so in linux-kernel's MAINTAINERS entry) |
|
I did notice there is a line in there about sorting the list by last name (I copied the template from another repo). If we have more than one person it is likely to make it impossible to sort, but the last name sort doesn't seem very useful IMO. Presumably contributors will be reading this file because they don't know the name of the person they are looking for. |
Our current approach to get eyeballs on issues relies on generous developers frequently triaging all issues. While convenient sometimes issues fall through the cracks. Providing a directory of maintainers allows contributors to take control and more quickly seek out the right maintainers to collaborate with.