For locally disabling the ligature you have several methods:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\begin{document}
a << b
a <{}< b
a {<}< b
a <\/< b
a <\textcompwordmark< b
\end{document}
I'd prefer the one with \/, because it's engine independent; the same example (but with fontspec) in LuaTeX
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\begin{document}
a << b
a <{}< b
a {<}< b
a <\/< b
a <\textcompwordmark< b
\end{document}
would give

because LuaTeX ignores braces when doing ligatures.
Of course, the best thing is to define a personal command, so you can modify the rendering without chasing the document for <\/<:
\newcommand\textll{<\/<}
and
a \textll{} b
When somebody will tell you that some negative kerning must be applied between the less than symbols, you'll be happy of having preferred an abstract method.
Side note: this assumes the OT1 encoding is not used; with it the input << would not produce a ligature, but ¡¡ (two reverse exclamation marks); the ligature << for a left guillemet is only active in the T1 encoding (and possibly LY1) and, with fontspec and (Xe|Lua)LaTeX, for fonts loaded with the Ligatures=TeX option.
a >> b. – kebs 17 hours agoa {<}< bcertainly would get around the ligature. – Steven B. Segletes 17 hours ago\verb@a <<b@or in averbatimenvironment. – jfbu 17 hours ago