Puzzling Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for those who create, solve, and study puzzles. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

One of my asked me this interesting question this evening-

It is said that Immanuael Kant was a bachelor of such regular habits that the good people of Palama would adjust their clocks when they saw him stroll past certain landmarks.

One evening Kant was dismayed to discover that his clock had run down. Evidently his manservent, who had taken the day off, had forgotten to wind it. The great philosopher did not reset the hands because his watch was being repaired and he had no way of knowing the correct time. He walked to the home of his friend Schmidt, a merchant who lived a mile away, glancing at the clock in Schmidt's halfway as he entered the house.

After visiting Schmidt for several hours Kant left and walked home along the route by which he came. As always, he walked with a slow, steady gait that had not varied in twenty years, He had no notion of how long this return trip took.(Schmidt had recently moved into the area and Kant had not yet timed himself on this walk.) Nevertheless, when Kant entered his house, he immediately set his clock correctly.

How did Kant know the correct time?

share|improve this question
4  
iphone, Samsung Galaxy, Nokia... – Alex 19 hours ago
23  
his wive was all nervous and started yelling: "It's 11 o'clock. where the hell have you been?" – Marius 19 hours ago
12  
I Kant figure this one out. – Devsman 17 hours ago
2  
Palama? Like how Einstein lived in Tasmania? – fNek 15 hours ago
10  
Q: "Why didn't he set his clock wrong?" A: "He Kant!" – Ian MacDonald 15 hours ago

10 Answers 10

up vote 23 down vote accepted

I think he did it like this -

He set his clock to 12:00 (C1) before he left. He walked x minutes to his friend's house and saw what time he arrived (y). When he was leaving he noted the time (z) and then walked back x minutes to arrive at C2.

The duration of his stay (z-y) subtracted from the elapsed time on the clock (C2 - C1) will give him his total walking time. Then he divides that by 2, adds it (x) to (z) and he knows the time.

$x = \dfrac{(C_2 - C_1) - (z - y)}{2}$

and

$z + x = now()$.

share|improve this answer
    
The question specifically states that he did NOT reset the hands before leaving home. – Matt Malone 16 hours ago
1  
@MattMalone then he just recorded the time they were at - it's still the beginning time. – Raystafarian 16 hours ago
3  
This makes the assumption that he winds the clock before leaving his house (which isn't stated). If the clock is not wound, it will not advance. – Ian MacDonald 15 hours ago
    
He flipped his hourglass? – Raystafarian 13 hours ago
1  
I guess this assumes that Schmidt did not "adjust his clock when he saw [Kant] stroll past a certain landmark". Otherwise Schmidt's clock is already incorrect by the time Kant gets there. – Mark Peters 11 hours ago

He knew the time because

the bells of a nearby church were ringing the hour

share|improve this answer
    
cool, missed that one, guess he could've bumped into someone with a correct watch too! – Jonathan Allan 19 hours ago
1  
But the church clock wouldn't be a reliable time source because someone might have seen Kant on his atypical stroll and incorrectly set the church clock against Kant. Schmidt's clock is only reliable because he'd recently moved house and because Kant checked the clock before Schmidt could change it. – user568458 13 hours ago
    
@user568458 But he didn't walk with visual distance of the church. – Kevin 8 hours ago

Kant set his clock at the usual time he left to see his friend just before he left.
Schmidt is a good friend so obviously his clock has the good time ( he probably saw Kant yesterday and adjusted his clock).
When he seee Kant today, he thinks that Kant still has his regular habits so Schmidt adjusts his clock.
The difference between the time before and the time after adjustment is also the difference between real time and Kant's clock so Kant can correct his clock.

Example :

Kant usually leaves at 8h so he sets his clock at 8h and leave. When he arrives it his 11h on Schmidt's clock and Schmidt adjusts it from 11h to 9h so Kant knows that his clock is 2 hours late.

share|improve this answer
    
That is an interesting solution, but how would he keep track of the time it takes to walk back? – Raystafarian 19 hours ago
3  
He doesn't need to keep track of time, he just needs to know the difference between his clock and real time so he can adjusts his clock when he comes back – Lord of dark 19 hours ago
2  
Good! I would just say Schmitt goes to set his clock - Kant would be a friend and stop him actually doing so. – Jonathan Allan 19 hours ago

Schmidt owns a watch/clock shop, and the purpose of Kant's visit was to pick up his repaired watch

share|improve this answer

Three possible answers:

  1. He wound his clock before he left and walks the same route back. When he gets home he can then add two times the measured first journey time plus the stay time (assuming his friend's clock keeps good time and Kant walks at an extremely regular pace).
  2. After staying a few hours from the evening he arrives home some time before dawn, he waits for sunrise, enters his house and sets his clock.
  3. Similar to 2. He arrives after dawn and looks at his sundial.

I am guessing the expected answer is 1. due to the wording of the problem, specifically the uses of "no notion" and "prior".

To perform 1. he must measure his journey time from the two times his clock shows (when he leaves home and when he returns home) and the two times his friends clock shows (when he arrived there and when he left):

$Journey=(KC_\text{arrivedK}-KC_\text{leftK}-FC_\text{leftF}+FC_\text{arrivedF})/2$

$Time_\text{arrivedK}=2\times(Journey+FC_\text{leftF}-FC_\text{arrivedF})$

share|improve this answer
    
First answer appears to be quite realistic. Second is wrong because when he enters house, he immediately sets the watch. – S.LAKSHMINARAYAN 19 hours ago
    
Yes, when he enters, not when he arrives - like I said he can wait before entering! – Jonathan Allan 19 hours ago
    
Ok Yeah got it.! – S.LAKSHMINARAYAN 18 hours ago

Possible answer:

The watch was repaired and delivered to his house in the hours that he was out. When he gets home, he simply sets the clock to his watch.

share|improve this answer

Possible answer:

As Kant arrives at his home next to the train station, he observes the daily train departing. With knowledge of the train schedule and the punctuality of the German trains, Kant confidently sets his clock to the correct time.

share|improve this answer

I think:

He burrowed or bought a watch from Schmidt (he is a merchant afterall).

share|improve this answer

This would be solvable if we have another source indicating the time. My solution-

Kant left the house as soon as he heard the church bell toll (e.g. - 10 am) (or a train leaving a station). As soon as he reaches, he checks the time (eg - 10:20 am). The difference tells him the time it takes from Kant to Schmidt's house (eg- 20 mins). He then leaves when the bell tolls again (eg- 4 pm), while noting the time. Since his gait is the same, it will take him the same time to return. He will then add this time to the time when he left Schmidt's house, to get the current time (4:20 pm).

share|improve this answer
    
If he can hear the bell from his house, why bother with the all the walking time calculations? He can just set the clock when he leaves, or when the bell chimes after he gets back. – Matt 2 hours ago

I think the answer is simpler than everyone is making out. This following line of the question I think is the most important one:

"he walked with a slow, steady gait that had not varied in twenty years"

He would only need to count the number of steps from his friend's place to his home. Assuming he knew what this particular gait was, the time of making one pace, he would merely have to multiply the number of steps by this time. That was the time elapsed on his trip back home from Schmidt's house.

Now, the question states that he glanced at the clock upon arriving at Schmidt's house, he could either have added the time of his stay at Schmidt's to his arrival time to get his departure time, or otherwise made note of the time as he left (not specifically mentioned in the question).

Either that or you can bypass all the math by just assuming he passed a landmark close to his home and saw the time (which isn't stated explicitly), or his manservant had picked up the repaired watch (correctly set) and brought it to his home (neither stated explicitly).

share|improve this answer
    
I like this answer, but the OP said He had no notion of how long this return trip took, so step-counting or any other means of working out "how long this return trip took" would need to be dismissed. – Lawrence 39 mins ago

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.