One of the main reasons why we haven't switched to clean energy is the lack of efficient storage methods - But , why aren't we using dead weights to store energy and draw it back later when needed? Illustration of roughly how energy can be stored using weight

share|cite|improve this question
3  
@Countto10 this doesn't really address the question. He's asking about the efficacy of energy storage, not the efficacy of solar power in general. And I also think you're being strangely dismissive of the efficacy of solar power--in much of the country, a roof's worth of solar panels can more than power a home. – Jahan Claes 13 hours ago
6  
Does because $mgh$ isn't that much energy for its size count? – Kyle Kanos 13 hours ago
14  
Actually we do in at least two cases. The counterweights on elevators are an energy storage and return system with the advantage of a direct mechanical coupling to their use resulting in modest thermal losses. And secondly there is pumped-hydro which is only a win in terms of fluctuating demand making up for the storage losses, by changing the price of power over time in a predictable way. – dmckee 13 hours ago
2  
There is a related project that powers a light with 10kg for ~30 minutes. – Amani Kilumanga 11 hours ago
10  
@dmckee: There are also clocks (e.g. "grandfather clocks": en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longcase_clock ) that use weights to store energy. – jamesqf 10 hours ago
up vote 32 down vote accepted

You can use dead weights, but you need a huge amount of weight.

For example the biggest pumped hydroelectric system in the world (the Gianelli Hydroelectric Plant in California, USA) uses water stored in a reservoir about 9 miles long by 5 miles wide, lifted through a height of about 300 feet. Even then, it can only supply about 5% of California's electricity usage for less than 2 weeks before running dry - and given the current long term droughts in California, it can't even do that, because there would be no water available to refill it.

Trying to build devices like this for individual homes would be hopelessly uneconomical.

One way to get "free" energy to pump the water is to use tidal barrages, but even in the most suitable locations, the amount of power you get from a given area of water behind the barrage is only the same order of magnitude as covering that entire area with solar panels. The biggest operating tidal barrage in Europe (which has been running for about 20 years) only supplies about 0.1% of France's total electricity consumption. Apart from giving people a feel-good message about "clean energy", it might as well not exist at all.

share|cite|improve this answer
2  
There is a project to power up lights for non-electricity places , GravityLight – lois6b 6 hours ago
    
You might like to mention that it is common to reverse hydro plants so as to pump water uphill when the thermal plants in a grid are making more power than being used. It's a common strategy in networks with mixed supply to smooth out demand. – WetSavannaAnimal aka Rod Vance 4 hours ago
2  
Its not the amount of energy you can get out of a pumped storage reservoir, it's the fact that it's available on demand at (ideally) any time and at a high rate (power). A large head of water is best, but tidal reservoirs combine net generation with storage. For pure storage see Dinorwig power station (linked below) – nigel222 4 hours ago
1  
Rance Tidal Power Station works fine, thanks. Problem with tidal energy is there is few really good spot for this, and also environmental impact is important. France hydroelectrical electricity production was 10.8% in 2015, 13.8% in 2013 thanks to more rain. – ch7kor 2 hours ago

Another way to store energy in mass is the use of flywheels. You simply take a massive wheel and spin it up to store energy, use an electrical generator as a break to take energy out.

Their main limitation for use outside of the realm of professional settings where they can be properly monitored and maintained by experts is the potential to fail catastrophically.

share|cite|improve this answer
6  
+1. I did see the effect of a 19th century steam powered engine flywheel failure (the governor jammed). It took out the walls of the windmill shaped building it was housed in. – Countto10 12 hours ago
3  
There were, 30-50 years ago, a number of schemes for vehicles employing flywheel storage. Some buses and some rail cars, in particular, but also a few experimental cars. The buses were in real live use at one point, and I'm thinking the rail cars as well. But probably battery technology overtook them. – Hot Licks 11 hours ago
3  
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_energy_recovery_system There's even a fancy Porsche using one today. – erich2k8 8 hours ago
2  
Tangential, but one really cool use of flywheels to store energy is the Cubli, a cube that can self balance on its corner – Cole Johnson 7 hours ago
    
Flywheels are widely used in environments where short high power peaks must be met. For a big one (1000MW peaks) see euro-fusion.org/fusion/jet-tech/jets-flywheels – nigel222 4 hours ago

Let's spin some numbers to further illustrate the poor energy density of gravity-based storage systems. Assume that you have a 100 kilogram lead weight that you can lower into a 10 meter deep hole in your yard.

Now, how much energy can it store? This is given by potential energy formula $E = mgh$, thus $E = 100\,\mathrm{kg} \cdot 9.8\,\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}^2 \cdot 10\,\mathrm{m} = 9.8\,\mathrm{kJ} \approx 2.7\,\mathrm{Wh}$.

For comparison, a single AA-sized battery stores about $2\,\mathrm{Wh}$ of energy.

share|cite|improve this answer

We do. Just the weights we use are made not from lead, but from water. Many water reservoirs are also used to store energy by pumping water up when you have energy surplus, and letting it come down through the generators when you need energy. All you need for this purpose is two or more reservoirs at different altitudes.

share|cite|improve this answer
    
Example of pumped storage, to meet sudden demand peaks on the UK National grid. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinorwig_Power_Station – nigel222 4 hours ago

We do, and we do it in the form of solid mass, too!

ARES uses rails to move concrete weights up and down.

 

Potential energy storage or gravity energy storage was under active development in 2013 in association with the California Independent System Operator. It examined the movement of earth-filled hopper rail cars driven by electric locomotives) from lower to higher elevations.

There is even an idea to use winches, as you described:

Stratosolar proposes to use winches supported by buoyant platforms at an altitude of 20 kilometers, to raise and lower solid masses.

Thus, your question is void, there is no reason we don't, because we do.

share|cite|improve this answer

We do use mass in a gravitational field to store energy and have done for hundreds of years!

Grandfather Clocks

Longcase Clock, Wikimedia Commons

Grandfather Clocks have used powering weights since the 1660s. This was when they first gained their tall thin shape. The weights seen in the picture slowly descend as their stored energy is released. In order to add energy back into the system the weight needs to be wound back up.

Ffestiniog Pumped Power Scheme

Ffestiniog Power Station

The Ffestiniog Power Station in Wales was opened in 1963 and was the UK's first large scale pumped hydroelectric energy storage system. The reservoir works in a very similar fasion to other grid storage solutions. When excess energy is produced (because coal power stations can't be shut down immmediatly for example) water is pumped from the lower reservoir back up to the higher one. When there is a surge in demand water flows in the reverse direction back down through turbines smoothing out any peak demand spikes making the whole grid more efficient.

GravityLight

Gravity Light

Finally something very similar to the design in your question. Here is a product which recently went through an Indiegogo funding campaign. It's called GravityLight and works by the action of a falling weight to provide power to remote villages and others who live off-grid.

share|cite|improve this answer

Indeed pumped storage, ARES, and Gravity Light are all examples of using weights to store energy but, like an earlier post suggested, the mass / vertical height required (and resulting cost) makes many examples prohibitively expensive. With the right geography, pumped storage is a relatively inexpensive way of storing large amounts of energy, but it only really makes sense at large scales because of many factors, including the pipeline infrastructure and the distance from typically remote mountainous areas to centres of demand (affecting the build cost and cost of transmission).

To provide large amounts of electricity storage capacity for a long period (e.g. 20 years or more of daily operation), technologies like pumped storage and compressed air are currently much cheaper than batteries, though they are constrained by geography.

Other electricity storage technologies involving weights include those being developed by Gravitricity, Gravity Power (shown below), and Ground-Breaking Energy Storage (effectively cutting a large cylinder of earth and then raising it by pumping water underneath).

Gravity Power's underground energy storage system

We can also use buoyancy as a means of storing energy. Research at the University of Windsor in Canada is ongoing into buoyancy energy storage, where a buoy is pulled down towards the seabed using a winch to charge the system, then allowed to rise back up to the surface of the sea in order to discharge the system and generate electricity. The winch is connected to a motor-generator in just the same way as the pump-turbine in a pumped storage plant is connected to a motor-generator, and can be located at the water surface (either on nearby land or on some kind of platform/barge) and connected to the base of the buoy via a pulley. Others are working on similar technology, including a company called Buoyant Energy.

Patent application 'Buoyancy energy storage and energy generation system', US 20100107627 A1

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.