Could I please have an example of closed sets with empty interior? Any topological space. Everything goes.

Remark: This is not homework. I'm in the middle of proving the space of $n$-degree polynomials in $(C[0,1], \lVert \cdot \rVert_\infty)$ is meager. Empty interior of this set (if I'm at all correct...) is the punchline and I just want to understand a bit more the nature of closed sets with empty interior.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 7 down vote accepted

Consider every finite set in the euclideian topology in $\mathbb{R}$

Also $\mathbb{Z}$ is closed because $\mathbb{R}$ \ $\mathbb{Z}=\bigcup_{n \in \mathbb{Z}}(n,n+1)$

Or the set $A= \{1/n | n \in \mathbb{N}\} \cup \{0\}$

Or the Cantor set which does not contain an interval but it is closed as an intersection of closed sets.

Or Every line and curve in the plane.

All these sets of course with the euclideian topology.

Also the finite sets in $\mathbb{N}$ with respect to the cofinite topology.

share|cite|improve this answer

Here are a few intuitive examples

  • Every singleton set $\{p\}$
  • The circle $\{(x,y) \in \mathbb{R}^2 : x^2 + y^2 = r^2\}$.
  • The line $y=mx + b$

The latter two can be generalized of course.

Edit: Here's a bit more intuition: the plane in $\mathbb{R^3}$ enter image description here

Take some point that doesn't lie in the plane. Do you see how you can find an open ball around it which doesn't intersect the plane? Think of the plane as being "thin", if you will. This tells you its complement is open, so the plane is closed. And by the "thin-ness", no point on the plane has an open ball around it contained in the plane.

So now we have a point, a line, and plane as being closed nowhere dense sets in $\mathbb{R}, \mathbb{R^2}, \mathbb{R^3}$ respectively. Can you try to generalize to find a closed set with empty interior in $\mathbb{R^n}$?

share|cite|improve this answer
1  
with respect to what topology? – juniven 7 hours ago
1  
The standard Euclidean topology – David Bowman 7 hours ago
    
OK I'll try and answer the question - The generalization is just taking the set of boundary points of a graph? – Friedman 6 hours ago
    
Certainly the boundary of every open set is nowhere dense, yes, but there's a bit more you can say – David Bowman 6 hours ago

Consider $X=\{a,b,c\}$ and $\tau=\{X,\varnothing,\{a\}\}$ and let $A=\{b,c\}$. Then $A$ is closed but $int(A)=\varnothing$

share|cite|improve this answer

I'm surprised no one proposed this one : $\emptyset$.

share|cite|improve this answer
1  
As far as I am concerned, I am surprised no one proposed this one: Let $E$ be a normed vector space and $F\subseteq E,F\neq E$ be a finite-dimensional subvector space, then $F$ is closed and has empty interior. – C. Falcon 6 hours ago

Consider in $\mathbb{R}^2$ the straight line $\{(x,x) \in \mathbb{R}^2 \; | \; x \in \mathbb{R}\}$. This set is closed since its complement is open, but it contains no ball in the metric topology of $\mathbb{R}^2$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Here's one: $\{0\} \subset \mathbb{R}$

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.