Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If $\;p=m+n$ where $p\in\mathbb P$, then $m,n$ are coprime, of course. But what about the converse?

Conjecture:

$p$ is prime if $\;\forall m,n\in\mathbb Z^+\!:\,p=m+n\implies \gcd(m,n)=1$

Tested for all $p<100000$.

share|cite|improve this question
    
This is very easy to prove – Eugen Covaci 3 hours ago
    
@EugenCovaci, yes I saw that. But I've never thought about this relationship before and I'm hunting for the 'Socratic' badge. $\;\overset{..}{\smile}$ – Lehs 3 hours ago
    
Really, it seems very interesting at the first view but it is illusory. – Piquito 3 hours ago
    
@Piquito. Yes, but still worth to notice. – Lehs 3 hours ago
up vote 6 down vote accepted

It is true. Suppose $p\geqslant 2$ is not prime. Then we can write $p=xy$ with $x,y\geqslant 2$. Then we find $p=m+n$, with $m=x$ and $n=x(y-1)$. Those are obviously not coprime.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.