microformats
Leeza Rodriguez
@microformats So riddle me this---why does Google 'recommend' Schema microdata for Rich Snippet markup? #schema
http://onebigfluke.com/2013/08/hrmm.html …: Which easier? * class='h-entry hentry' * itemprop='blogPost' itemscope='itemscope' itemtype='http://schema.org/BlogPosting '
-
-
-
@LeezaRodriguez Google has a history of 'recommending' harder things: 2005 Google Base 2007 Google Data 2009 Google rdf*data-vocabulary*org -
@microformats but doncha think most webmasters will implement what Google hath blessed?#schema -
@LeezaRodriguez webmasters will implement easiest thing that Google *implements* (#microformats over microdata/rdfa/schema). Why waste time? -
@microformats Because if G prefers schema , it will help my CTR , my SERPS and maybe ...Knowledge Graph. I want what G wants. -
@LeezaRodriguez Google implements microformats, microdata, schema, rdfa and uses all of them for SERPs etc. Why make it harder on yourself? -
@microformats what if 'recommend' means preference in the algo? Why else would they give this guidance? Just sayin.#schema -
@LeezaRodriguez Google "recommends" structured markup in general. No preference for#microformats/#microdata/#rdfa/#schema. - ಇನ್ನಷ್ಟು ತೋರಿಸಿ
-
-
Surely the clue is in the name :
@microformats
Lafinboy
ಲೋಡಿಂಗ್ ಸಮಯ ಸ್ವಲ್ಪ ತೆಗೆದುಕೊಳ್ಳುತ್ತಿರುವಂತೆನಿಸುತ್ತದೆ.
Twitter ಸಾಮರ್ಥ್ಯ ಅಧಿಕವಾಗಿರಬಹುದು ಅಥವಾ ಈ ಕ್ಷಣದ ತೊಂದರೆಯನ್ನು ಅನುಭವಿಸುತ್ತಿರಬಹುದು. ಮತ್ತೆ ಪ್ರಯತ್ನಿಸಿ ಅಥವಾ ಇನ್ನಷ್ಟು ಮಾಹಿತಿಗೆ Twitter ಸ್ಥಿತಿ ಗೆ ಭೇಟಿ ನೀಡಿ.