When I worked at @iseressex in the 1990s, the unit's library prided itself on having the biggest collection of "grey literature" on longitudinal social science, and everything we wrote went first into our working paper series first, then journals.
-
-
ಈ ಥ್ರೆಡ್ ತೋರಿಸಿ
-
On production, working papers were mailed to a long list of libraries, & available at cost on application. The difference with pre-print servers like
@socarxiv is there is no cost of production, & they are instantly available to everyone for free. (Well, the infrastructure costs)ಈ ಥ್ರೆಡ್ ತೋರಿಸಿ
ಸಂವಾದದ ಮುಕ್ತಾಯ
ಹೊಸ ಸಂವಾದ -
-
-
Seems to ignore the fact that their concerns got a total and repeated ass-whupping in Nature and other venues (here's a short response form
@LoganCorina@lgatt0 and I) https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06055-3 …)@KamounLab -
Thanks Jon. I actually missed the response.
-
No worries! I think three came out in Nature at the same time, as well as a lot more discourse. Needless to say, the original position was widely discredited.
ಸಂವಾದದ ಮುಕ್ತಾಯ
ಹೊಸ ಸಂವಾದ -
-
-
Even Nature had a preprint server more than a decade ago
ಧನ್ಯವಾದಗಳು. Twitter ಇದನ್ನು ನಿಮ್ಮ ಕಾಲರೇಖೆಯನ್ನು ಉತ್ತಮಗೊಳಿಸಲು ಬಳಸುತ್ತದೆ. ರದ್ದುಗೊಳಿಸುರದ್ದುಗೊಳಿಸು
-
ಲೋಡಿಂಗ್ ಸಮಯ ಸ್ವಲ್ಪ ತೆಗೆದುಕೊಳ್ಳುತ್ತಿರುವಂತೆನಿಸುತ್ತದೆ.
Twitter ಸಾಮರ್ಥ್ಯ ಮೀರಿರಬಹುದು ಅಥವಾ ಕ್ಷಣಿಕವಾದ ತೊಂದರೆಯನ್ನು ಅನುಭವಿಸುತ್ತಿರಬಹುದು. ಮತ್ತೆ ಪ್ರಯತ್ನಿಸಿ ಅಥವಾ ಹೆಚ್ಚಿನ ಮಾಹಿತಿಗೆ Twitter ಸ್ಥಿತಿಗೆ ಭೇಟಿ ನೀಡಿ.