jelani cobbಪರಿಶೀಲಿಸಿದ ಖಾತೆ

@jelani9

Harlem Resident, Staff Writer . Professor , Foxhole Atheist. Skeptical citizen. Rooting for (almost) everybody black.

Following the North Star GPS
newyorker.com/contributors/j…
ಮಾರ್ಚ್ 2008 ಸಮಯದಲ್ಲಿ ಸೇರಿದ್ದಾರೆ
366 ಫೋಟೋಗಳು ಅಥವಾ ವೀಡಿಯೋಗಳು ಫೋಟೋಗಳು ಮತ್ತು ವೀಡಿಯೋಗಳು

ಟ್ವೀಟ್‌ಗಳು

ನೀವು @jelani9 ಅವರನ್ನು ತಡೆಹಿಡಿದಿರುವಿರಿ

ಈ ಟ್ವೀಟ್‌ಗಳನ್ನು ವೀಕ್ಷಿಸಲು ನೀವು ಖಚಿತವಾಗಿ ಬಯಸುವಿರಾ? ಟ್ವೀಟ್ ವೀಕ್ಷಣೆಯು @jelani9 ಅವರ ತಡೆತೆರವುಗೊಳಿಸುವುದಿಲ್ಲ

  1. ಪಿನ್ ಮಾಡಿದ ಟ್ವೀಟ್
    ಮಾರ್ಚ್ 25

    Woke ≠ Smart

    66 replies 845 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 3,212ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
    ರದ್ದುಗೊಳಿಸು
  2. 19 ಗಂಟೆಗಳ ಹಿಂದೆ

    Which is exactly the point I was trying to raise. Nate is articulating *precisely* the position the reactionaries in Charlottesville held 15 months ago.

    watching this controversy over boycotts play out my only thought is how the objection depends on classifying racism/white nationalism/white supremacy as just another category of political speech rather than something qualitatively different, and more dangerous, given our history.
    12 replies 41 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 285ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
    ರದ್ದುಗೊಳಿಸು
  3. ಅವರು ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
    ಡಿಸೆಂ 19
    ಅವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾರೆ

    The boycott of companies that did business with apartheid South Africa was essential in that regime's demise. In the late 1940s/early 1950s, the knew that what kept that racist government afloat was millions in $. The NAACP worked with the ANC to shut that flow down.

    4 replies 46 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 168ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
    ರದ್ದುಗೊಳಿಸು
  4. ಡಿಸೆಂ 19

    Tiffany suddenly noticing the upside of being on the margins.

    "The Trump Foundation raised more than $2.8 million that it used for the 2016 election," writes . Trump was not solely at fault for the wrongdoing. The foundation’s directors — Donald Jr., Ivanka and Eric all breached their fiduciary duties.
    23 replies 47 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 361ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
    ರದ್ದುಗೊಳಿಸು
  5. ಡಿಸೆಂ 19

    Final point bc I have to run: one of the things that has struck me about the common impulse binding various bigotries is the association with uncleanliness. “Dirty [insert epithet here]” Nothing ever comes of this association but eventual violence directed at the targeted group.

    @jelani9 ಅವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾರೆ
    That's sort of a strawman—I don't want corporations to be political actors. I want them to be as apolitical as possible. I don't want them making decisions about editorial content. I want corporations to make products in legal ways, and I want governments to regulate them.
    3 replies 15 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 96ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
    ರದ್ದುಗೊಳಿಸು
  6. ಡಿಸೆಂ 19

    Parameters actually matter. People weren’t going after Carlson’s advertisers this hard when he voiced other typically right wing/potentially offensive ideas. But “dirty” was reasonably seen as a bridge too far.

    @jelani9 ಅವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾರೆ
    That's sort of a strawman—I don't want corporations to be political actors. I want them to be as apolitical as possible. I don't want them making decisions about editorial content. I want corporations to make products in legal ways, and I want governments to regulate them.
    5 replies 25 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 97ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
    ರದ್ದುಗೊಳಿಸು
  7. ಡಿಸೆಂ 19

    The net effect of what you’re arguing is a kind of useless equivalency. Advertisers associating with my views about race in the New Yorker or your views about statistical probabilities in an election is *not* in the same boat as one financing the idea that immigrants are dirty.

    @jelani9 ಅವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾರೆ
    That's sort of a strawman—I don't want corporations to be political actors. I want them to be as apolitical as possible. I don't want them making decisions about editorial content. I want corporations to make products in legal ways, and I want governments to regulate them.
    12 replies 37 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 213ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
    ರದ್ದುಗೊಳಿಸು
  8. ಡಿಸೆಂ 19

    But a corporation is never not political esp given that our bizarre legal system awards them the status of personhood. They donate to political candidates. They lobby. Moreover in this case they were advertising *on a show about politics*.

    @jelani9 ಅವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾರೆ
    That's sort of a strawman—I don't want corporations to be political actors. I want them to be as apolitical as possible. I don't want them making decisions about editorial content. I want corporations to make products in legal ways, and I want governments to regulate them.
    14 replies 110 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 696ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
    ರದ್ದುಗೊಳಿಸು
  9. ಡಿಸೆಂ 19

    But are you opposed to corporate responsibility? In this instance you’re asking the corporation why they’re literally paying someone who calls immigrants “dirty.”

    @heathr @jelani9 ಅವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾರೆ
    I think it's good to use speech (protest) as a lever against corporations. What I don't want is to use corporations as a lever against speech.
    22 replies 49 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 459ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
    ರದ್ದುಗೊಳಿಸು
  10. ಅವರು ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
    ಡಿಸೆಂ 19
    ಅವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾರೆ

    In my book about the history of boycotting, I show that abolitionists and white Southern nationalists employed the tactic in the 19th c. There is nothing inherently "progressive" or conservative about boycotting. But it is an American political tradition.

    6 replies 24 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 158ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
    ರದ್ದುಗೊಳಿಸು
  11. ಡಿಸೆಂ 19

    Years ago Fryer was quoted in the NYT saying his work was concerned with figuring out “where black people went wrong.” I have some suggestions.

    Roland Fryer was the youngest African-American to earn tenure at Harvard. Now the star economist is embroiled in an inquiry into sexual harassment.
    9 replies 33 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 203ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
    ರದ್ದುಗೊಳಿಸು
  12. ಡಿಸೆಂ 19

    But Nate, this is akin to saying black people in Montgomery should not have boycotted busses because white people were already boycotting black schools. The fact that a tactic can be used for just or unjust purposes doesn’t mean you should never engage it.

    In fact, I am gay, and I'm just old enough (40) to remember when conservative groups urged boycotts of advertisers and networks who were seen as promoting LGBTQ or other "nontraditional" lifestyles. That strongly influences my views on this subject!
    105 replies 1,610 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 10,115ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
    ರದ್ದುಗೊಳಿಸು
  13. ಡಿಸೆಂ 19

    Ah. Our version of this is “the magical Negro.” Benign, mystical creature whose main trait, a superhuman talent for forbearance, exists to make white people feel good about themselves.

    What does inspiration porn mean? A portrayal of people with disabilities as one dimensional things that only exist to warm the hearts and open the minds of able bodied people.
    ಈ ಥ್ರೆಡ್ ತೋರಿಸಿ
    9 replies 27 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 200ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
    ರದ್ದುಗೊಳಿಸು
  14. ಅವರು ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
    ಡಿಸೆಂ 19

    Thank you for saying this . It is critical that people understand that the work has just begun.

    But, to be clear, the FIRST STEP Act is very much just that – a first step. It is a compromise of a compromise, and we ultimately need to make far greater reforms if we are to right the wrongs that exist in our criminal justice system.
    ಈ ಥ್ರೆಡ್ ತೋರಿಸಿ
    4 replies 114 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 493ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
    ರದ್ದುಗೊಳಿಸು
  15. ಡಿಸೆಂ 19

    “A shocking pattern of illegality” — at least we know the title of one of the doctoral dissertations that will come out of this national debacle.

    8 replies 33 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 345ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
    ರದ್ದುಗೊಳಿಸು
  16. ಡಿಸೆಂ 19

    Good to know we have our priorities straight.

    State of play: is unfit to run a charity in New York State but fit to control nuclear weapons that could destroy the world several times over.
    1 reply 49 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 217ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
    ರದ್ದುಗೊಳಿಸು
  17. ಅವರು ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
    ಡಿಸೆಂ 18

    I would also submit that where much of the civil rights legal strategy of the 20th c. was designed, & which trained Pauli Murray and Thurgood Marshall, like did much in the service of human needs.

    Sorry that ⁦⁩ didn’t recognize ⁦⁩ as an answer to his question: For three decades training people to practice “law in the service of human needs.” My work is indebted to this expressly ethical foundation.
    1 reply 8 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 28ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
    ಈ ಥ್ರೆಡ್ ತೋರಿಸಿ
    ಈ ಥ್ರೆಡ್ ತೋರಿಸಿ
    ರದ್ದುಗೊಳಿಸು
  18. ಅವರು ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
    ಡಿಸೆಂ 18

    Buying latest book because I am not an asshole 😂

    1 reply 5 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 18ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
    ರದ್ದುಗೊಳಿಸು
  19. ಅವರು ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
    ಡಿಸೆಂ 18

    Have you logged out yet?

    NAACP remains concerned about the data breaches and numerous privacy mishaps that the tech giant has encountered in recent years, and is especially critical about those which occurred during the last presidential election campaign.
    4 replies 25 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 51ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
    ರದ್ದುಗೊಳಿಸು
  20. ಡಿಸೆಂ 18

    1. yes 2. I went to Howard University and the squirrels were... black.

    1. yes 2. yes 3. unrelated to the questions but i once saw a hawk snatch a squirrel straight up while i was walking through the field next to memorial gym at uva
    9 replies 8 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆಗಳು 78ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
    ರದ್ದುಗೊಳಿಸು
  21. ಡಿಸೆಂ 18

    I can personally confirm that this is indeed Kathryn Schulz.

    @dstfelix ಅವರಿಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಕ್ರಿಯಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾರೆ
    I will pick up that banner and carry it for you.
    2 replies 1 ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸುವಿಕೆ 8ಇಷ್ಟಗಳು
    ರದ್ದುಗೊಳಿಸು

@jelani9 ಅವರು ಇನ್ನೂ ಟ್ವೀಟ್ ಮಾಡಿಲ್ಲ.

ಲೋಡಿಂಗ್ ಸಮಯ ಸ್ವಲ್ಪ ತೆಗೆದುಕೊಳ್ಳುತ್ತಿರುವಂತೆನಿಸುತ್ತದೆ.

Twitter ಸಾಮರ್ಥ್ಯ ಮೀರಿರಬಹುದು ಅಥವಾ ಕ್ಷಣಿಕವಾದ ತೊಂದರೆಯನ್ನು ಅನುಭವಿಸುತ್ತಿರಬಹುದು. ಮತ್ತೆ ಪ್ರಯತ್ನಿಸಿ ಅಥವಾ ಹೆಚ್ಚಿನ ಮಾಹಿತಿಗೆ Twitter ಸ್ಥಿತಿಗೆ ಭೇಟಿ ನೀಡಿ.

    ಇದನ್ನೂ ಸಹ ನೀವು ಇಷ್ಟಪಡಬಹುದು

    ·