http://www.heretical.com/miscella/aids.html “It’s a green monkey thang, y’all wouldn’t unnerstan!” SIR – I have been waiting for an authoritative comment on the article by Roger Highfield and Charles Clover (Science, Feb. 1) suggesting that Aids began as a result of people in Central Africa eating certain chimpanzees. As none has been forthcoming, your readers – and perhaps the medical profession – might like to know of my own experience. In 1957, as a student nurse, I was working at the Fever Hospital in Johannesburg. Patients were sent to us from all over Africa. Few could speak English, so could not describe their symptoms in detail or tell us how they might have contracted their particular illness. I remember clearly the first patient who came in with very odd sores. A lot of tests were done – saliva, tears, blood, etc. – but we could not identify his problem, and he died. Suddenly there was a spate of similar cases, all from Central Africa and all ending in the patient’s death. The hospital asked a mission station in the Belgian Congo (as it then was) to send someone down to tell us more about their lifestyle and what they ate. We were told that in the Congo there was an endearing little monkey, grey but with a green sheen to its coat. While other chimps and monkeys were hunted and eaten – as they still are all over Africa – these were adopted as pets and even venerated, as people believed that the green sheen had mystic powers. Despite this veneration (or perhaps because of it), I was taken aback to learn that men copulated with them, some apparently picking up some sort of virus as a result. When we realised that we did not know how to cure these very ill men, we decided there was no point in admitting any more. They simply stayed at home and died. We called it green monkey disease; some time later our professor, Jock Gear, said he was sure they were the first cases of Aids to come to official notice. One question remains to be answered. Presumably humans had had sexual relations with these monkeys for a very long time. So why was it only in the 1950s, and only in a relatively small area of Central Africa, that the monkeys contracted the virus, and passed it on? Where did they get it from? Mrs POLLY KIRK Millom, Cumbria Letters to the Editor, London Daily Telegraph, May 17 1999

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/southafrica/1362134/South-African-men-rape-babies-as-cure-for-Aids.html

Dats my emergency AIDS cure in dat dair fuck bucket yo!

South African men rape babies as ‘cure’ for Aids

By Jane Flanagan in Johannesburg 12:01AM GMT 11 Nov 2001
THE alleged rape of a nine-month-old baby girl by six men in a remote part of rural South Africa last week has focused the nation on an 80 per cent rise in child sexual abuse over a year, much of it connected with the country’s Aids pandemic.
More than 67,000 cases of rape and sexual assaults against children were reported last year, compared with 37,500 in 1998. Child welfare groups believe that the number of unreported incidents could be up to 10 times that number.
Some of the victims were as young as six-months-old, a number of whom died from their injuries, while others contracted HIV. The largest increase in attacks has been against children under seven.
Although rises in poverty, violent crime and unemployment are said to have contributed to the escalation in child abuse, the most significant and worrying factor is the widespread myth sweeping the country that having sex with children provides a cure for Aids.
Cati Vawda, the director of the Children’s Rights Centre in Durban, said: “There is a belief across South Africa that a virgin will cure a man of HIV or Aids. We have no idea where this idea has come from, but it has been around for a few years and has certainly taken hold.”

Gender theory banned in NSW classrooms

Students will no longer be taught that gender is a “social construct”, or that sexuality is “non-binary”, occurring on a ­continuum and “constantly changing”.

An edict encouraging teachers to “de-gender” their language will also likely be scrapped, along with sexually explicit case studies and teaching aids such as the “Genderbread Person”, which promotes the idea that there are “infinite possibilities” of gender identity.

Announced in September, the review by professor Bill Louden followed reports in The Australian that a sex education resource, the Teacher Toolbox for delivering content related to diversity of sex, sexuality and gender, was promoting Safe Schools materials, possibly in contravention of federal guidelines.

Further revelations about Crossroads, the state’s compulsory sex education program for Years 11 and 12, also pushing gender theory, prompted the then education minister Adrian Piccoli to order a review into the research base and scientific underpinning of the material. An update on the review has been provided to teachers, ­detailing a list of resources that should not be used.

The list includes the 17-page Teacher Toolbox resource, the Affirming Diversity unit aimed at Year 10 and three of the sexual and gender diversity activities contained within the Crossroads program.

One of those, called Opposite Ends of the Pole, encourages students to consider various case studies, including “Joseph”, a man married with three children who “masturbates [and] fantasises only about men” as well as “Alex”, who had sex with girls as a teenager but has developed a relationship with a man since moving to a country town.

The department yesterday ­declined to comment on the specific recommendations of the ­review and it is not clear whether the ban stems from specific ­recommendations or is pending the ­department’s response to the review.

It is also not clear whether new Education Minister Rob Stokes will have a role in endorsing recommendations from the review.

Gender theory, and its creeping influence on government-run education, has been a controversial topic over the past year, having also underpinned the divisive Safe Schools program.

The concept of deconstructing gender derives from 1990s “queer” theory and is understood to be highly contested, even within the social sciences. According to the NSW Education Standards Authority’s statement of equity principles, curriculum and support materials should reflect evidence-based ­research.

The document also states, however, that teaching materials should provide “opportunities for students to evaluate and deconstruct gender and sexuality”.

Labor MP Greg Donnelly, who has campaigned for the ­removal of Safe Schools, called on the Education Department to ­release the latest review.

“It is important that the public gets to see what is in the review ­report,” he said. “Given the highly controversial statements that were contained in the teaching material, mums and dads are ­entitled to know what the review report says and recommends.”

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/education/gender-theory-banned-in-nsw-classrooms/news-story/eeb40f3264394798ebe67260fa2f5782

“Vices the most notorious seem to be the portion of this unhappy [negro] race: idleness, treachery, revenge, cruelty, impudence, stealing, lying, profanity, debauchery, nastiness and intemperance, are said to have extinguished the principles of natural law, and to have silenced the reproofs of conscience.”
–Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1798.

Negroes evolved in a plentiful and rich biotope so it was not a problem to be wasteful or to destroy things.
They were in competition with other animals and because of their inability to craft tools to overcome the balance, they developed loud and aggressive behavior to scare off or kill other animals that potentially were a threat (so the ones that where less aggressive were less successful).
All other races have Neanderthal dna in them. These hominids lived in a harsh climate around 100,000 to 250,000 years ago.
Cooperation, teamwork, saving and managing resources was key to survival.
Empathy came in to play as well as if one member of the group was weak or injured it was beneficial to help him or her.
This member might have had a skill that would pay off in the long term.
Also taking care of your children and teaching them is more important in a harsh climate. Making sure they don’t freeze to death or starve in the pre teen years becomes more important as well.
Africans had to deal with a high death rate from wildlife, but there was enough easy food and living to keep up a high rate of birth.
Because of this there was no genetic selection for cooperation ,teamwork abilities, intellect , empathy, efficiency conservancy or the ability to convey information from one person to another , simply because nature never required it.

The poorest Whites are less criminal than all but the wealthiest 10% of Blacks:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/03/23/poor-white-kids-are-less-likely-to-go-to-prison-than-rich-black-kids/

Race is also more tightly correlated to homicide rate than single-parent households are, and population density has no correlation to homicide:

http://www1.udel.edu/soc/faculty/parker/SOCI836_S08_files/Landetal_AJS90.pdf
Violent crime correlates more tightly with race than with wealth or population density:

http://www.ronunz.org/2013/07/20/race-and-crime-in-america/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_income

http://www.worldatlas.com/articles/the-most-dangerous-states-in-the-u-s.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_African-American_population