Twitter | 搜索 | |
Philip Klein
Managing Editor, Washington Examiner. Author of Overcoming Obamacare.
49,716
推文
743
正在关注
38,201
关注者
推文
Philip Klein 2小时
. on Donald Trump's most casually broken promise
Reply Retweet 喜欢
Philip Klein 转推了
Jake Tapper 23小时
“Jewish lies” — I quoted Farrakhan and provided a link to video of his speech on NOI website along with time codes.
Reply Retweet 喜欢
Philip Klein 转推了
Chris Smith 3月6日
回复 @philipaklein
An interesting excerpt from Georgia's legislative assembly on secession and the 9 Amendments from the US Constitution that would be needed for them to join. 9 for 9 were protecting... Slavery
Reply Retweet 喜欢
Philip Klein 3月6日
回复 @ChrisSmith47
The amount of gaslighting perpetuated by the lost causers is quite remarkable.
Reply Retweet 喜欢
Philip Klein 3月6日
回复 @philipaklein
A totally unrelated but interesting side note is that the Confederate Constitution gave the president a line-item veto.
Reply Retweet 喜欢
Philip Klein 3月6日
Randomly reading the Constitution of the Confederacy reflecting on how absurd it is that anybody could say Civil War was really about states rights when 1) Most modifications to U.S. Constitution involve slavery & 2) It denies states & territories right to bar slavery.
Reply Retweet 喜欢
Philip Klein 3月5日
回复 @yeselson
Bibi is an incredibly polarizing figure, including in Israel, including among people who agree with him on a lot of issues. I don't think any criticism of him/his policies is anti-Semitic.
Reply Retweet 喜欢
Philip Klein 3月5日
回复 @yeselson
Key distinction is between criticizing policy X and saying, "If you agree with Israel on policy X, you're putting interests of foreign government over interests of the U.S."
Reply Retweet 喜欢
Philip Klein 转推了
Anthony V Clark 3月5日
I am Danny’s opponent in the primary. From serving in military, running a nonprofit, a small business, and office, I have taken a stand against anyone who holds or accepts racist ideologies.
Reply Retweet 喜欢
Philip Klein 3月5日
回复 @yeselson
my point is that he enabled anti-Semitism, gave it cover, employed tropes that were traditionally anti-Semitic. I expanded on the point (and on problem of liberal anti-semitism) a bit more here.
Reply Retweet 喜欢
Philip Klein 3月5日
"you guys"? As in Jews? Way to prove my point.
Reply Retweet 喜欢
Philip Klein 3月5日
回复 @yeselson
if you want to close your ears to all of the dog whistles, I can't help you.
Reply Retweet 喜欢
Philip Klein 3月5日
And yes, Obama was such a friend of Jews. Give me a break.
Reply Retweet 喜欢
Philip Klein 3月5日
In defending the Hagel nomination, his administration took the position that AIPAC and "Jewish" were interchangeable.
Reply Retweet 喜欢
Philip Klein 3月5日
回复 @yeselson
Accusing Menendez -- who comes from state with one of the largest Jewish populations -- that he's motivated by donor pressures. I mean, come on.
Reply Retweet 喜欢
Philip Klein 3月5日
Translation = Jewish money is trying to make lawmakers act at behest of Israel instead of in the interests of the U.S.
Reply Retweet 喜欢
Philip Klein 3月5日
so clearly Obama viewed them as interchangeable. Dog whistle is obvious when he says Congress should evaluate deal "not based on lobbying but based on what's in the national interest of the United States of America
Reply Retweet 喜欢
Philip Klein 3月5日
It's crystal clear he was talking about the Jews. Remember, his nominee for Defense Sec, Chuck Hagel, condemned the "Jewish lobby" but excuse was he really meant "Israel lobby"
Reply Retweet 喜欢
Philip Klein 3月5日
回复 @yeselson
That is the classic, age old, anti-Semitic trope of a small minority exerting disproportionate & nefarious influence.
Reply Retweet 喜欢
Philip Klein 3月5日
回复 @yeselson
Obama took position that the Jewish lobby & Jewish donors were using money to put pressure on lawmakers, and that was why they were opposing it rather than legit concerns about the deal. That was a central part of the argument.
Reply Retweet 喜欢