|
Wear's Warts
@
iwh889
|
|
The debunking of low level Holocaust Denier John Wear
|
|
|
8.805
Txioak
|
27
Jarraitzen
|
56
Jarraitzaileak
|
| Txioak |
|
|
Wear's Warts
@iwh889
|
2 h |
|
So where does he mention Datner as a source for 200,000?
|
||
|
||
|
|
Wear's Warts
@iwh889
|
2 h |
|
You read Slezkine's book?
😉
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Wear's Warts
@iwh889
|
2 h |
|
I'm afraid you can....
holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2007/08/kevin-…
Kmd is just another Jew hater...except with a brain.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Wear's Warts
@iwh889
|
2 h |
|
His book looks good.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Wear's Warts
@iwh889
|
3 h |
|
He also has a problem with Jews serving in the German army....but then that was brought up a couple of weeks ago.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Wear's Warts
@iwh889
|
3 h |
|
Kmd...
This guy?
holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2007/08/kevin-…
🙄
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Wear's Warts
@iwh889
|
3 h |
|
Read his stuff on Jews and Poles in the Eastern territories.
Not very good on context is he....
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Wear's Warts
@iwh889
|
3 h |
|
I have.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Wear's Warts
@iwh889
|
3 h |
|
So you missed out on shakespeare's excellent portrayal of Shylock as a normal human being with normal feelings wanting revenge against arrogant Xians.
That's the thing about Will... He always makes the audience think.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Wear's Warts
@iwh889
|
3 h |
|
Another meme ....
I would have thought you might have learned not to use them after being caught telling lies about certain Greek philosophers.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Wear's Warts
@iwh889
|
3 h |
|
You got a better source than the rantings of Polish nationalists on some obscure twitter page?
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Wear's Warts
@iwh889
|
3 h |
|
Bielawski is not used as a source in Grabowski's book.
Not good at this are you...
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Wear's Warts
@iwh889
|
3 h |
|
I can prove that Grabowski used more than one source.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Wear's Warts
@iwh889
|
3 h |
|
...that's not proof.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Wear's Warts
@iwh889
|
3 h |
|
I think I'll hang around.... Come back when you have actually read Grabowski's book. That way you will have some idea about what you are actually talking about.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Wear's Warts
@iwh889
|
6 h |
|
Nobody is forcing you to stay.
🙄
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Wear's Warts
@iwh889
|
6 h |
|
Your ignorance of the proof has been noted.
His book is public.
Deal with it.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Wear's Warts
@iwh889
|
6 h |
|
You want his other source?
You didnt say...
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Wear's Warts
@iwh889
|
6 h |
|
I don't.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Wear's Warts
@iwh889
|
6 h |
|
Says the woman who who hasn't actually read what is being argued about.
I'm more than happy to discuss the primary source.
It appears you are too scared to do so.
|
||
|
|
||