تويتر | بحث | |
Clive Baldwin
Senior Legal Advisor, Human Rights Watch. Audere est facere
٢٬٨٣٦
التغريدات
١٬٨٢٥
متابعة
٣٬٢٣٦
متابع
التغريدات
٤ س Clive Baldwin
As Theresa May faces a crucial week on Brexit, I explain why her plans risk a bonfire of workers’ rights.
Reply Retweet أعجبني
٨ مارس Clive Baldwin
Workers’ rights should be a key part of the Brexit discussion, given the key role the EU has in protecting them. But as I explain here, Theresa May’s promises are thin gruel - and leave it open for future UK govts to scrap these rights after Brexit.
Reply Retweet أعجبني
قام Clive Baldwin بإعادة تغريد
٥ مارس Laila Matar
Given 's appalling record of targeting defenders and violating human rights under the guise of countering terrorism, its leadership on any resolution that aims to protect human rights while countering terrorism is absurd and dangerous.
Reply Retweet أعجبني
٥ مارس Clive Baldwin
@true رداً على
The problem with the powers of the attorney general was summed-up by in 2010. Nothing has changed. The AG is still in reality a member of the government, & the govt interfering with individual prosecutions is ‘anathema to the rule of law’.
Reply Retweet أعجبني
٥ مارس Clive Baldwin
The UK government may make prosecutions of members of its armed forces subject to the approval of its attorney general. This would be a step backwards for justice as the executive -the government- should not be able to interfere in individual cases.
Reply Retweet أعجبني
١ مارس Clive Baldwin
« Seeking justice for Syrians is no doubt a marathon, but if history teaches us anything, it is that massive human rights violations must not be left unpunished - however long it takes to deliver justice. «  ⁦
Reply Retweet أعجبني
قام Clive Baldwin بإعادة تغريد
٢٧ فبراير CGHR
Clive Baldwin , Senior Legal Advisor at Human Rights Watch, will be joining us for a Practitioner Series event next week on Wednesday 6 March at 5pm in S1, ARB. All are welcome!
Reply Retweet أعجبني
٢٧ فبراير Clive Baldwin
Pat Finucane murder inquiry fell below human rights standards, judges rule
Reply Retweet أعجبني
٢٦ فبراير Clive Baldwin
It’s not just a health issue, but part of the global move to stop the use of children as soldiers. The UK is the only European country to still recruit children.
Reply Retweet أعجبني
٢٦ فبراير Clive Baldwin
The Chagossian people have been fighting for their right to return home since the UK forced them to leave their homeland in the 1970s. (I worked with them a decade ago.) A key ruling by the UN’s court this week, concludes that the UN General Assembly should take up their rights.
Reply Retweet أعجبني
قام Clive Baldwin بإعادة تغريد
٢٤ فبراير Belkis Wille
The Swedish court decision to convict an officer of war crimes for posing with decapitated suspects is important because it reminds us that law exists to push us to be more humane, not to be discarded in a race to the bottom
Reply Retweet أعجبني
٢٢ فبراير Clive Baldwin
@true رداً على
And of course the UK government should always ensure it does not make anyone stateless, for any period of time. It should listen to its own Supreme Court that described the ‘evil of statelessness’ in a judgment in 2013. (6/6)
Reply Retweet أعجبني
٢٢ فبراير Clive Baldwin
@true رداً على
Anyone threatened with having their citizenship removed needs to be able to access a fully fair hearing, where they and their lawyer can see & challenge the evidence used, & the decision is suspended until any legal challenge is over. Not the current secretive system (5/6).
Reply Retweet أعجبني
٢٢ فبراير Clive Baldwin
@true رداً على
Any power to remove citizenship should only be used as a last, not a first resort. Those making such a decision need to consider its full impact, including on children and others affected. (4/6).
Reply Retweet أعجبني
٢٢ فبراير Clive Baldwin
@true رداً على
UK law gives its Home Secretary the power to remove citizenship when he thinks it’s ‘conducive to the public good’. This is hopelessly vague & increases the risk of arbitrary decisions. The legal justification for removing citizenship should be much tighter. (3/6)
Reply Retweet أعجبني
٢٢ فبراير Clive Baldwin
@true رداً على
Begum’s case shows the alarming powers the UK govt has to strip its citizens of their nationality. The power to take such a drastic step should not rest with one politician, , subject to political pressure. It should be with an independent figure like a judge. (2/6)
Reply Retweet أعجبني
٢٢ فبراير Clive Baldwin
Even UK ministers involved in removing ‘s citizenship say it’s important to follow international law. But that means more than avoiding statelessness. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights says no one should be ‘arbitrarily’ deprived of their nationality. (1/6)
Reply Retweet أعجبني
٢٢ فبراير Clive Baldwin
Civilians are leaving ISIS-controlled Baghuz but the battle for its control appears to have been waged without sufficient consideration to their wellbeing. New satellite imagery shows large scale destruction, often in areas where civilians were present
Reply Retweet أعجبني
٢١ فبراير Clive Baldwin
The UK is on the wrong side of the law on arms sales to Saudi Arabia, a parliamentary committee has concluded. Instead of pressing to resume arms sales to Saudi Arabia should follow Germany’s example, writes
Reply Retweet أعجبني
٢٠ فبراير Clive Baldwin
The UK Supreme Court (Lord Wilson) ruling on the “evil of statelessness” in 2013. (The case was the Home Secretary v Al Jedda.) “... terrible practical consequences still flow from lack of nationality.”
Reply Retweet أعجبني