Twitter | Search | |
Alexander Clarkson
Lecturer for German and European Studies at King's College London. Opinions my own. RT not always endorsement.
191,545
Tweets
887
Following
12,642
Followers
Tweets
Alexander Clarkson 7m
Replying to @JMJalel_H
Which means Russia will always be outbid and outflanked by rivals and partners with greater staying power and larger resources committed to Libya.
Reply Retweet Like
Alexander Clarkson retweeted
GorseFires Collectif 10m
Replying to @APHClarkson
Nope. He appears to have tried that t-shirt on (borrowed) and a sweatshirt with "No Sanctions" when in Red Square, Moscow in October 2014
Reply Retweet Like
Alexander Clarkson retweeted
spextr 13m
Replying to @APHClarkson
FT included it in one of their articles though: google says the picture is pretty old, 2014 or so (mostly italian sources, so I can't estimate their trustworthiness)
Reply Retweet Like
Alexander Clarkson retweeted
Stephanie Lamy 17m
Replying to @APHClarkson
There seems to be series of these, and they are from his FB profile acc to this source
Reply Retweet Like
Alexander Clarkson retweeted
Lincoln Pigman 20m
Replying to @APHClarkson
Indeed, while Western commentators continue to present Russia as firmly in control of developments in Syria, Russian commentators have long since argued that the primary challenge for Russia is its competition with Iran for influence in Syria
Reply Retweet Like
Alexander Clarkson 17m
Replying to @JMJalel_H
Of course it should be analysed and broached. But such analysis has to set out how far Russian goals match its capacity to achieve them
Reply Retweet Like
Alexander Clarkson 17m
Replying to @JMJalel_H
If you haven't done that in this paper, you will be challenged about it by a lot of colleagues in a manner similar to what I have argued in this thread
Reply Retweet Like
Alexander Clarkson 18m
Replying to @JMJalel_H
If you want to start looking at the impact of Russian power in any geopolitical flashpoint, you also need to take at the extensive Russia analysis literature examining the extent and limits of that power
Reply Retweet Like
Alexander Clarkson 19m
Replying to @JMJalel_H
Russia has had an impact in both Libya and Russia. But impact is not the same as being able to control outcomes
Reply Retweet Like
Alexander Clarkson 20m
Replying to @JMJalel_H
If Moscow cannot exert dominance in Syria, where it has large bases, heavy troop commitments, has sunk billions in funding, has a clear proxy network through the 5th Legion, how do you expect it to exert dominance in Libya where it has sunk a fraction of such resources?
Reply Retweet Like
Alexander Clarkson 23m
Yes Salvini is a Putin fan, but that is surely photoshop
Reply Retweet Like
Alexander Clarkson 23m
Replying to @JMJalel_H
It's very fashionable to focus entirely on Russia's role when it comes to geopolitical flashpoints rather than looking how it interacts with other major players in each case. A lot of analysis presenting Moscow as the player that will shape Syria from 2016 now looks dubious
Reply Retweet Like
Alexander Clarkson 25m
Replying to @JMJalel_H
What exactly are we confronting here? Russia has returned to Libya to assert interests and goals in conjunction with other players including UAE and Egypt that in many ways are pretty conventional. Libya has too many players involved for any one actor to dominate outcomes
Reply Retweet Like
Alexander Clarkson 26m
Replying to @JMJalel_H
I'd be happy to read your paper. But I have enough other evidence in front of me of the limits of Russian power, from the Baltics, to the Balkans, the Med, Syria and yes Libya as well as to have strong doubts about how its role is often overplayed
Reply Retweet Like
Alexander Clarkson 27m
Vladimir Gel'man is always interesting to listen to on power dynamics in Russia
Reply Retweet Like
Alexander Clarkson retweeted
Thomas Pierret 34m
As explains, Sadr has a record (pre-2006) of nationalist, trans-sectarian outreach.
Reply Retweet Like
Alexander Clarkson 33m
Replying to @JMJalel_H
Russia causes disruption. But when the chips are down it is unable to gain enough leverage through soft power or intimidate enough through hard power to even remain dominant in the post-Soviet space, never mind the rest of Europe and the Middle East
Reply Retweet Like
Alexander Clarkson 34m
Replying to @JMJalel_H
The effect Russia makes is mixed. It causes disruption, yet none of its so-called allies in the EU blocked sanctions. It helped Trump yet now faces ramping up of US forces in Europe. It takes Crimea and turns Ukraine and its army of 280 000 from benign neighbour to bitter enemy
Reply Retweet Like
Alexander Clarkson 38m
Replying to @JMJalel_H
In a head to head confrontation against Italy alone in the Med or Sahel, Russia would lose. Throw in France and Spain and it would lose badly
Reply Retweet Like
Alexander Clarkson 38m
Replying to @JMJalel_H
If you look at researchers, from Michael Kofman, Mark Galeotti, Alexander Golts, Vladimir Gel'man, Kyrill Kobrin and many others you'd note nuanced analysis of Russia's weaknesses and its strengths with consensus that despite all the disruption it is weaker than NATO and the US
Reply Retweet Like