in-reply-toThis article is a stub. You can help the IndieWebCamp wiki by expanding it.
in-reply-to is a microformat for use where a post is a reply to another post. The reply post should hyperlink to the other post with u-in-reply-to. Often linked inside the reply-context of a reply post.
Additionally:
How to consume in-reply-toSummary: collect an ordered list of unique in-reply-to URLs by checking and adding from:
algorithmGiven a URL of a post, to determine the URL(s) it’s in-reply-to:
You may use a different algorithm if it produces exactly the same results. E.g. you could skip checking "if not already there" conditions, and instead at the end perform a step of "* Remove duplicate values from in-reply-to-urls" - as long as you removed latter duplicates, and kept first occurrences in the list.
Usage ExamplesFAQMust an in-reply-to link be inside an h-entryQ: Does an in-reply-to link have to be inside an h-entry? A: No. An in-reply-to link can be anywhere on the page using rel-in-reply-to, which then makes that page represent a reply to the destination of that link. The first h-entry, if any, then represents specifically the reply content and author, which may or may not actually contain the in-reply-to link. Why would an in-reply-to be outside an h-entryQ: Why would a page have a rel-in-reply-to outside an h-entry? A: A simple rel=in-reply-to hyperlink is easier for publishers to publish simple permalink reply pages and thus we want to allow that. They may later add h-entry markup for the contents of their comment and authorship, which may not actually contain the link at all. In the broader blogosphere, comments on posts rarely actually include the URL of the post they're commenting on, thus you can't depend on the in-reply-to being inside the h-entry (or certainly not inside the content) of such a reply post. ResearchSee: For the research and development of the See Also |



















