Mathematica Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Wolfram Mathematica. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am aware that the topic of vertical filling has been discussed before (e.g., here and here), but I could not find any reasonably simple solution to the following problem:

I have a discrete data set which I plot with ListLinePlot. I want to fill the area between the data and a given y value if the data is below that value. That much is easy:

data = Table[{x, (x - 5)^2 + 3}, {x, 0, 10}];

Show[ListLinePlot[data, 
  Filling -> {1 -> {15, {Directive[Blue, Opacity[0.1]], None}}}], 
 ListPlot[data]]

enter image description here

However, now I want the filling to have a vertical gradient in opacity (or white level, I don't really mind) such that the filling is blue at y=3 and transparent for y>15. I found a solution for filling under all data points using polygons and for parametrizable functions. However, as it happens, my filling does not end at a data point and it seems to me that applying the polygon solution would be quite a hack that involves first finding and constructing proper boundary points for the polygon.

Is there really no simpler way for vertical gradients?

Edit:

Just for the sake of completeness, I realized that the above link (filling under all data points) does give a suggestion of how to use ParametricPlot together with Interpolate to create a vertical gradient filling on discrete data. The code would look like this:

interp = Interpolation[data, InterpolationOrder -> 1];
Show[ListLinePlot[data], 
 ParametricPlot[{x, 
   With[{value = 15 (1 - y) + interp[x] y}, 
    If[value > interp[x], value]]}, {x, 0, 10}, {y, 0, 1}, 
  ColorFunction -> (Blend[{Blue, White}, #2] &), 
  BoundaryStyle -> None]]

However, the result is much less appealing then the polygon solution. It is possible to improve the quality by ramping up the PlotPoints, but then it takes very long to calculate the graph and exporting it, in particular to pdf, crashes Mathematica completely on my computer.

enter image description here

share|improve this question
1  
Your plotting code can be simplified: ListLinePlot[data, Filling -> {1 -> {15, {Directive[Blue, Opacity[0.1]], None}}}, PlotMarkers -> Automatic. – rcollyer 8 hours ago
    
My thought is to do the "hack" you mention, but constructing the polygon is not hard, because it's already done for you. If the plot is called p1, then Cases[Normal@p1, _Polygon, Infinity] extracts the polygon. – march 6 hours ago
up vote 8 down vote accepted

As you say, it's a hack, but it's a relatively small one:

p1 = ListLinePlot[data, Filling -> {1 -> {15, {Directive[Blue, Opacity[0.1]], None}}}, PlotMarkers -> Automatic]

Then:

Normal@p1 /. Polygon[x_] :> Polygon[x, VertexColors -> (Blend[{Blue, White}, (#2 - Min@x[[All, 2]])/(Max@x[[All, 2]] - Min@x[[All, 2]])] & @@@ x)]

enter image description here

The Min-Max stuff is meant to re-scale the y-values so that they go between 0 and 1, allowing us to Blend from Blue to White.

share|improve this answer
    
It works very well. Good idea to extract the polygon from the plot! – Felix 6 hours ago
3  
+1. You could also write: VertexColors -> (Blend[{Blue, White}, #] & /@ Rescale[x[[All, 2]]]) rather than doing the rescaling by hand. Of course the result is the same, but perhaps it enhances readability. – MarcoB 5 hours ago

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.