Well defined environment for nested contexts of the receiving browsing context? #367
Comments
|
The behavior of |
|
CC @zhaobin2016 After internal discussion, we propose that Also the same restrictions on the top-level receiving browsing context should apply to nested contexts. |
|
This was addressed by PR #395 (which erroneously referred to a different issue). |
mfoltzgoogle
closed this
Dec 20, 2016
mfoltzgoogle
referenced
this issue
Dec 20, 2016
|
|
mfoltzgoogle |
f2f4fee
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
tidoust commentedNov 16, 2016
The Presentation API imposes a well-defined environment for the receiving browsing context when it is created, but it does not say anything about nested browsing contexts that this browsing context could create (e.g. with an
<iframe>).I'm not clear how the restrictions on cookies, Application cache, Permissions, IndexedDB, Web Storage, and Service Workers propagate to nested browsing contexts in particular. Should the spec rather attach the steps that deal with these constraints to the create a browsing context algorithm in HTML so that they apply to all browsing contexts on the receiving side?
(This issue is unrelated to but still triggered by the discussion around
[SameObject]and receiving browsing contexts in #365)