Central Limit Theorem
Let
be a set of
independent
random variates and each
have an arbitrary
probability distribution
with
mean
and a finite
variance
. Then
the normal form variate
![]() |
(1)
|
has a limiting cumulative distribution function which approaches a normal distribution.
Under additional conditions on the distribution of the addend, the probability density itself is also normal
(Feller 1971) with mean
and variance
. If conversion to normal form is not performed,
then the variate
|
(2)
|
is normally distributed with
and
.
Kallenberg (1997) gives a six-line proof of the central limit theorem. For an elementary, but slightly more cumbersome proof of the central limit theorem, consider the inverse Fourier transform of
.
|
(3)
| |||
|
(4)
| |||
|
(5)
| |||
|
(6)
|
Now write
![]() |
(7)
|
so we have
|
(8)
| |||
|
(9)
| |||
|
(10)
| |||
|
(11)
| |||
|
(12)
| |||
|
(13)
| |||
|
(14)
| |||
|
(15)
| |||
|
(16)
|
Now expand
|
(17)
|
so
|
(18)
| |||
|
(19)
| |||
|
(20)
|
since
|
(21)
| |||
|
(22)
|
Taking the Fourier transform,
|
(23)
| |||
|
(24)
|
This is of the form
|
(25)
|
where
and
.
But this is a Fourier transform of a Gaussian
function, so
|
(26)
|
(e.g., Abramowitz and Stegun 1972, p. 302, equation 7.4.6). Therefore,
![]() |
(27)
| ||
![]() |
(28)
| ||
|
(29)
|
But
and
, so
|
(30)
|
The "fuzzy" central limit theorem says that data which are influenced by many small and unrelated random effects are approximately normally distributed.


![sqrt(pi/(((2pisigma_x)^2)/(2N)))exp{(-[2pi(mu_x-x)]^2)/(4((2pisigma_x)^2)/(2N))}](/National_Library/20160521004321im_/http://mathworld.wolfram.com/images/equations/CentralLimitTheorem/Inline76.gif)
![sqrt((2piN)/(4pi^2sigma_x^2))exp[-(4pi^2(mu_x-x)^22N)/(4·4pi^2sigma_x^2)]](/National_Library/20160521004321im_/http://mathworld.wolfram.com/images/equations/CentralLimitTheorem/Inline79.gif)
binomial distribution




