Bernoulli Number
The Bernoulli numbers
are a sequence of signed rational
numbers that can be defined by the exponential
generating function
|
(1)
|
These numbers arise in the series expansions of trigonometric functions, and are extremely important in number theory and analysis.
There are actually two definitions for the Bernoulli numbers. To distinguish them, the Bernoulli numbers as defined in modern usage (National Institute of Standards
and Technology convention) are written
, while the Bernoulli
numbers encountered in older literature are written
(Gradshteyn
and Ryzhik 2000). In each case, the Bernoulli numbers are a special case of the Bernoulli polynomials
or
with
and
.
The Bernoulli number and polynomial should not be confused with the Bell numbers and Bell polynomial, which are also
commonly denoted
and
, respectively.
Bernoulli numbers defined by the modern definition are denoted
and sometimes
called "even-index" Bernoulli numbers. These are the Bernoulli numbers
returned, by example, by the Wolfram Language
function BernoulliB[n].
The Bernoulli number
can be defined by the contour
integral
|
(2)
|
where the contour encloses the origin, has radius less than
(to avoid the
poles at
), and is traversed in a counterclockwise
direction (Arfken 1985, p. 413).
The first few Bernoulli numbers
are
|
(3)
| |||
|
(4)
| |||
|
(5)
| |||
|
(6)
| |||
|
(7)
| |||
|
(8)
| |||
|
(9)
| |||
|
(10)
| |||
|
(11)
| |||
|
(12)
| |||
|
(13)
| |||
|
(14)
| |||
|
(15)
|
(OEIS A000367 and A002445), with
|
(16)
|
for
, 2, ....
The numbers of digits in the numerator of
for the
, 4, ... are 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 3, 1, 4, 5, 6, 6,
9, 7, 11, ... (OEIS A068399), while the numbers
of digits in the corresponding denominators are 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 4, 1, 3, 3, 3, 3,
4, 1, 3, 5, 3, ... (OEIS A092904). Both are
plotted above.
The denominator of
is given by
|
(17)
|
where the product is taken over the primes
(Ex. 6.54 in Graham
et al. 1994), a result which is related to the von
Staudt-Clausen theorem.
The number of digits in the numerators of
for
, 1, ... are 1, 1, 83, 1779, 27691, 376772, 4767554,
57675292, 676752609, 7767525702, ... (OEIS A103233),
while the corresponding numbers of digits in the denominator are 1, 2, 5, 9, 13,
16, 24, ... (OEIS A114471). The values of the
denominators of
for
, 1, ... are
66, 33330, 342999030, 2338224387510, 9355235774427510, ... (OEIS A139822).
for 1806, but for no other
(Kellner 2005).
The running maxima of denominators are 1, 6, 30, 42, 66, 2730, 14322, 1919190, ... (OEIS A100194), which occur for
, 4, 6, 8, 12,
14, 32, 38, ... (OEIS A100195).
The fraction of
with even
that have denominator
6 is strictly positive (Jensen 1915), with similar results for other denominators
(Erdős and Wagstaff 1980, Moreno and Wagstaff 2005).
Interestingly, a higher proportion of Bernoulli denominators equal 6 than any other value (Sunseri 1980), and the fraction of even Bernoulli numbers with denominator
6 is close to 1/6 (Erdős and Wagstaff 1980). S. Plouffe (pers. comm., Feb. 12,
2007) computed the fraction of even Bernoulli numbers with denominator 6 up to
and found it to be 0.1526... and still
slowly decreasing.
The numbers of Bernoulli numbers less than or equal to 1, 10,
, ... having
denominator 6 are 0, 1, 10, 87, 834, ... (OEIS A114648),
which approaches the decimal expansion of
.
The above histogram shows the fraction of denominators
having given denominators for index up to
. Ranked in
order of frequency, the first few denominators appear to be 6, 30, 42, 66, 510, ...
(OEIS A114649).
The only known Bernoulli numbers
having prime
numerators occur for
, 12, 14, 16, 18, 36, and 42 (OEIS
A092132), corresponding to 5,
, 7,
, 43867,
, and 1520097643918070802691
(OEIS A092133), with no other primes for
(E. W. Weisstein, Feb. 27,
2007). Wagstaff maintains a page of factorizations of Bernoulli number numerators.
The following table summarizes record computations of the
th Bernoulli number
, including giving the number of digits in the
numerator.
| digits in numerator | denominator | date | reference | |
| 14977732474858443510 | Fee and Plouffe | |||
| 584711591137493802510 | 2002 | Plouffe (2002) | ||
| 936123257411127577818510 | Dec. 16, 2002 | Kellner | ||
| 9601480183016524970884020224910 | Feb. 10, 2003 | Kellner | ||
| 936123257411127577818510 | Oct. 8, 2005 | O. Pavlyk (pers. comm.) | ||
| 9601480183016524970884020224910 | Feb. 2008 | O. Pavlyk (2008) | ||
| 394815332706046542049668428841497001870 | Oct. 2008 | D. Harvey (2008) |
The denominator of
(mod 1) is
given by the von Staudt-Clausen theorem,
which also implies that the denominator of
is squarefree
(Hardy and Wright 1979). Another curious property is that the fractional
part of
has a decimal
expansion period that divides
, and there is a
single digit before that period (Conway 1996). In particular, the periods of
for
, 4, ... are
1, 1, 6, 1, 2, 6, 1, 16, 18, 2, 22, ... (OEIS A112828),
and the corresponding values of
are
2, 4, 1, 8, 5, 2, 14, 1, 1, 10, ... (OEIS A112829).
Consider the generating function
|
(18)
|
which converges uniformly for
and all
(Castellanos 1988). Taking the partial
derivative gives
|
(19)
| |||
|
(20)
| |||
|
(21)
|
The solution to this differential equation can be found using separation of variables as
|
(22)
|
so integrating gives
|
(23)
| |||
|
(24)
|
But integrating (24) explicitly gives
|
(25)
| |||
|
(26)
| |||
|
(27)
|
so
|
(28)
|
Solving for
and plugging back into (◇)
then gives
|
(29)
|
(Castellanos 1988). Setting
and adding
to both sides then gives
|
(30)
|
Letting
then gives
|
(31)
|
for
.
The Bernoulli numbers may also be calculated from
|
(32)
|
The Bernoulli numbers are given by the double sum
|
(33)
|
where
is a binomial
coefficient. They also satisfy the sum
|
(34)
|
which can be solved for
to give
a recurrence relation for computing
. By adding
to both sides of (34), it
can be written simply as
|
(35)
|
where the notation
means the
quantity in question is raised to the appropriate power
and all terms of the
form
are replaced with the corresponding
Bernoulli numbers
.
as well as the interesting sums
|
(36)
| |||
|
(37)
| |||
|
(38)
|
(Lehmer 1935, Carlitz 1968, Štofka 2014), as well as the nice sum identity
|
(39)
|
(Gosper).
An asymptotic series for the even Bernoulli numbers is
|
(40)
|
Bernoulli numbers appear in expressions of the form
, where
, 2, .... Bernoulli
numbers also appear in the series expansions of functions involving
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, and
.
An analytic solution exists for even orders,
|
(41)
| |||
|
(42)
|
for
, 2, ..., where
is the
Riemann zeta function. Another intimate connection
with the Riemann zeta function is provided
by the identity
|
(43)
|
An integral in terms of the Euler polynomial is given by
|
(44)
|
where
is an Euler
polynomial (J. Crepps, pers. comm., Apr. 2002).
Bernoulli first used the Bernoulli numbers while computing
.
He used the property of the figurate number
triangle that
|
(45)
|
along with a form for
which he
derived inductively to compute the sums up to
(Boyer 1968,
p. 85). For
, the sum is given by
|
(46)
|
where again the notation
means the
quantity in question is raised to the appropriate power
and all terms of the
form
are replaced with the corresponding
Bernoulli numbers
. Note that it is common (e.g., Carlitz
1965) to simply write
with the
understanding that after expansion,
is replaced
by
.
Written explicitly in terms of a sum of powers,
|
(47)
| |||
|
(48)
| |||
|
(49)
|
where
|
(50)
|
Taking
gives Bernoulli's observation that
the coefficients of the terms
sum to 1,
|
(51)
|
Ramanujan gave a number of curious infinite sum identities involving Bernoulli numbers (Berndt 1994).
Plouffe (pers. comm., Jun. 21, 2004) conjectured that the fractional parts of positive Bernoulli numbers of the form
satisfy
either
or
.
However, there are many counterexamples, the first few of which occur for
(found
by Plouffe also on Jun. 21, 2004), 6216210, 8128890, 10360350, 13548150, ...
(OEIS A155125). Interestingly, all of these
are numbers having a large number of factors in their primes factorizations, as summarized
in the following table. The indices of these numbers having incrementally smallest
value of
are given by 2072070, 6216210,
10360350, 18648630, 31081050, 35225190, 93243150, ... (OEIS A155126),
which appear to tend to occur at positions in the original list that are powers of
2 (1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 18, 64, ...).
| factorization
of | ||
| 2072070 | 0.6664435068 | |
| 6216210 | 0.6588649656 | |
| 8128890 | 0.6648723198 | |
| 10360350 | 0.6564013890 |
The older definition of the Bernoulli numbers, no longer in widespread use, defines
using the equations
|
(52)
| |||
|
(53)
|
or
|
(54)
| |||
|
(55)
|
for
(Whittaker and Watson 1990,
p. 125). The
Bernoulli numbers may be calculated
from the integral
|
(56)
|
and analytically from
|
(57)
|
for
, 2, ..., where
is the Riemann zeta function.
The Bernoulli numbers
are a superset
of the archaic ones
since
![]() |
(58)
|
The first few Bernoulli numbers
are
|
(59)
| |||
|
(60)
| |||
|
(61)
| |||
|
(62)
| |||
|
(63)
| |||
|
(64)
| |||
|
(65)
| |||
|
(66)
| |||
|
(67)
| |||
|
(68)
| |||
|
(69)
|

bernoulli number

