Emily Landau

@EmilyBLandau

Senior Research Fellow&Head of Arms Control Program@INSS; Lecturer@TAU&U of Haifa&IDC; Author&Commentator; 1 of 50 most influential women in Israel,Forbes 2015

Tel Aviv
inss.org.il/index.aspx?id=…
Joined November 2013
311 Photos and videos Photos and videos

Tweets

You blocked @EmilyBLandau

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @EmilyBLandau

  1. 7 hours ago

    Note in this article how journalist refers to the JCPOA: "Obama's nuclear-containment deal". Anyone remember when Obama said unequivocally that his policy on Iran nuclear threat is one of *prevention*, not containment?? Yeah, me too....

    4 retweets 5 likes
    Undo
  2. Retweeted
    17 hours ago

    הגרעין האיראני חוזר לכותרות לקראת ? הד"ר אמילי לנדאו, חוקרת המכון למחקרי ביטחון לאומי, מזהירה: "כרגע, עם הסכם הגרעין הנוכחי, ייקח לאיראן פחות משנה להגיע לרמה גרעינית צבאית" >>

    2 replies 6 retweets 6 likes
    Undo
  3. 9 hours ago

    This is so warped. Sounds like: "let's ignore a serious report that exposes realities that have been ignored cause we don't care. Oh, and let's plant words in their mouth about them actually wanting war. Yeah, that always works." This from someone focused on NONproliferation??

    If this Administration attacks Iran remember the role this Institute for Science and International Security report played in justifying it.
    1 reply 2 retweets 4 likes
    Undo
  4. Retweeted
    15 hours ago
    Replying to

    No. We do not advocate for military options in this piece. We won’t be smeared for simply sharing what the Iranian Nuclear Archives show. You are advocating for hiding this information, like many of your colleagues.

    8 replies 13 retweets 21 likes
    Undo
  5. 9 hours ago

    Exactly correct. The tweet u r replying to is precisely the kind of statement that set the stage for the deeply&dangerously flawed JCPOA, which sets the stage for Iran to acquire nuc weapons. And if that happens, it will be *his* type of analysis that will have paved the way.

    Replying to @NarangVipin
    No. We do not advocate for military options in this piece. We won’t be smeared for simply sharing what the Iranian Nuclear Archives show. You are advocating for hiding this information, like many of your colleagues.
    2 retweets 1 like
    Undo
  6. Retweeted
    16 hours ago

    National Security Adviser Bolton cites our recent report on the Iranian Nuclear Archive, the sixth report in a series that finds governments and did not know full extent of Iran’s past nuclear weapons work. IAEA needs to investigate this new info without further delay.

    Report: Iran's secret nuclear archive "provides substantial evidence that Iran's declarations to IAEA are incomplete & deliberately false." The President was right to end horrible Iran deal. Pressure on Iran to abandon nuclear ambitions will increase.
    2 replies 33 retweets 41 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  7. Retweeted
    24 hours ago

    With current level of inspections, Iran could have an active nuclear weapons program today and IAEA would not know. That is one reason why Israel’s recent actions to seize a portion of the archive and expose a secret nuclear-related warehouse are so important. 5/5

    1 reply 18 retweets 19 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  8. Retweeted
    24 hours ago

    We view the NIE as incorrect about Iran’s nuclear weapons program ending in 2003. Reorientation, yes; halt, no. This mistake helped lead to a misplaced complacency in JCPOA implementation about the need for robust inspections of military sites in Iran. 1/5

    Useful info. But isn’t the key date here 2002, and how that fits nicely with what the NIE determined in 2007 about the 2003 “halt”? A reference point also referred to by the IAEA. And faced with this data, isn’t the best tool extra monitoring for 25 years?
    3 replies 7 retweets 6 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  9. 10 hours ago

    No, what you've written here is wrong. IAEA (Amano) definitive report on Iran PMD from Dec 2015 states that Iran had a military program up to 2003, and continued in a less coordinated manner until *at least* 2009. Read IAEA report before making irresponsible statements

    Useful info. But isn’t the key date here 2002, and how that fits nicely with what the NIE determined in 2007 about the 2003 “halt”? A reference point also referred to by the IAEA. And faced with this data, isn’t the best tool extra monitoring for 25 years?
    1 retweet 2 likes
    Undo
  10. Retweeted
    20 hours ago

    is directing, financing & arming 's terrorists, with the full intention of attacking Israeli civilians. Israel foiled this Iranian scheme. Attempts by the ayatollahs in Tehran to intrude Israel's sovereignty & endanger Israeli lives will never be tolerated.

    0:37
    , armed & funded by , dug six tunnels crossing from into Israel. Hezbollah & Iran intended to use these tunnels to attack Israeli civilians. Iran's aggression must be stopped!
    7 replies 64 retweets 114 likes
    Undo
  11. 10 hours ago

    Will France take a firmer stance beyond just calling on Iran? Will Macron return to his four-point plan on Iran that he presented to US Congress in late April 2018, which he said should be basis for discussions *regardless* if Trump leaves the nuc deal?

    Undo
  12. 17 hours ago

    The most dangerous "worthless verbiage" comes from the horrific Iranian regime, and yet a think tank in DC invites Zarif (a master of "lying verbiage") and goes so far as to praise him as part of "all star" group of speakers. Hmmmm....

    This is worthless verbiage. These women have done nothing but engage in peaceful self-expression, many have already been “convicted” in the newspapers, & Saudi Arabia has no meaningful due process that protects the rights of the accused. SecState is naïve to accept & parrot this.
    Show this thread
    2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes
    Undo
  13. Retweeted
    8 Dec 2018

    : Will Saudi Arabia become a nuclear power? It’s aimed at civilian nuclear–unless Iran... via

    1 retweet 1 like
    Undo
  14. 18 hours ago

    Thanks! I tweet at

    : Will Saudi Arabia become a nuclear power? It’s aimed at civilian nuclear–unless Iran... via
    2 likes
    Undo
  15. 22 hours ago

    This shld have been clear to P5+1 negotiators w Iran on nuclear issue!!At the time I wrote that one thing to avoid in the deal was: *ambiguity*. Cause Iran will abuse it to its favor. Elementary. But of course, they didn't heed .. see my piece from 2014:

    Astute: “In truth, manufacturing ambiguity has been Iran’s best approach to thorny subjects. It is why 20 years since the advent of the “reform movement,” Washington think-tankers continue to debate whether the reformists will subdue the hardliners.”
    2 retweets 11 likes
    Undo
  16. 23 hours ago

    בנושא שקרוב מאד לליבי: צילום של חלק מהמתנדבות/ים המדהימות/ים בכלבייה העירונית של רעננה. הם עושים עבודת קודש ממש למען הכלבים -- באהבה ובמסירות אין קץ, במלוא מובן המילה, בשיתוף פעולה עם עמותת ״חבר לי.״ ניתן להגיע לכלבייה כדי לאמץ כלב/חבר לחיים. שם תפגשו את הצוות המהמם!! ❤️

    2 likes
    Undo
  17. Retweeted
    Jan 13

    Excellent analysis “The JCPOA, Three Years On” by INSS experts Emily B. Landau and Ephraim Asculai. A must for everyone in the USA and Europe with interest in stability in the Middle East and beyond!

    6 retweets 7 likes
    Undo
  18. 23 hours ago

    Two less prominent messages need 2b highlighted here: first, author neglects to say clearly that Iran *worked on a military nuc program*, and its denials *are a lie*. Second, re final Salehi quote: if Iran is in *better* position today, it's b/c of JCPOA

    2 retweets 2 likes
    Undo
  19. 24 hours ago

    Quoted:“If [world continues to think 'deal is working'] it means that int'l actors are not working to stop this now, [and] Iran could reach the stage where it could get [to nukes] clandestinely b/c the world is not paying attention to what is going on

    5 retweets 4 likes
    Undo
  20. Retweeted
    Jan 14

    IRAN: Experts say latest developments elevate concern Tehran may skirt diplomatic, military efforts to block its path to nukes:

    3 replies 11 retweets 10 likes
    Undo

@EmilyBLandau hasn't Tweeted yet.

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·