Perfect Number
Perfect numbers are positive integers
such that
|
(1)
|
where
is the restricted
divisor function (i.e., the sum of proper
divisors of
), or equivalently
|
(2)
|
where
is the divisor
function (i.e., the sum of divisors
of
including
itself). For example,
the first few perfect numbers are 6, 28, 496, 8128, ... (OEIS A000396),
since
|
(3)
| |||
|
(4)
| |||
|
(5)
|
etc.
The
th perfect number is implemented in the
Wolfram Language as PerfectNumber[n]
and checking to see if
is a perfect number as PerfectNumberQ[k].
The first few perfect numbers
are summarized
in the following table together with their corresponding indices
(see below).
| 1 | 2 | 6 |
| 2 | 3 | 28 |
| 3 | 5 | 496 |
| 4 | 7 | 8128 |
| 5 | 13 | 33550336 |
| 6 | 17 | 8589869056 |
| 7 | 19 | 137438691328 |
| 8 | 31 | 2305843008139952128 |
Perfect numbers were deemed to have important numerological properties by the ancients, and were extensively studied by the Greeks, including Euclid.
Perfect numbers are also intimately connected with a class of numbers known as Mersenne primes, which are prime numbers of the form
. This can be demonstrated by considering
a perfect number
of the form
where
is prime.
By definition of a perfect number
,
|
(6)
|
Now note that there are special forms for the divisor function
|
(7)
|
for
a prime, and
|
(8)
|
for
. Combining these with the additional
identity
|
(9)
|
where
is the prime factorization of
, gives
|
(10)
| |||
|
(11)
| |||
|
(12)
|
But
, so
|
(13)
|
Solving for
then gives
|
(14)
|
Therefore, if
is to be a perfect number,
must be of the
form
. Defining
as a prime number
of the form
, it then follows that
|
(15)
|
is a perfect number, as stated in Proposition IX.36 of Euclid's Elements (Dickson 2005, p. 3; Dunham 1990).
While many of Euclid's successors implicitly assumed that all perfect numbers were of the form (15) (Dickson 2005, pp. 3-33), the precise statement that all even perfect numbers are of this form was first considered in a 1638 letter from Descartes to Mersenne (Dickson 2005, p. 12). Proof or disproof that Euclid's construction gives all possible even perfect numbers was proposed to Fermat in a 1658 letter from Frans van Schooten (Dickson 2005, p. 14). In a posthumous 1849 paper, Euler provided the first proof that Euclid's construction gives all possible even perfect numbers (Dickson 2005, p. 19).
It is not known if any odd perfect numbers exist, although numbers up to
(Ochem and Rao 2012) have been
checked without success.
All even perfect numbers
are of
the form
|
(16)
|
where
is a triangular
number
|
(17)
|
such that
(Eaton 1995, 1996). In addition,
all even perfect numbers are hexagonal numbers,
so it follows that even perfect numbers are always the sum of consecutive positive
integers starting at 1, for example,
|
(18)
| |||
|
(19)
| |||
|
(20)
|
(Singh 1997), where 3, 7, 31, ... (OEIS A000668) are simply the Mersenne primes. In addition, every
even perfect number
is of the form
, so they can be generated using the
identity
![]() |
(21)
|
It is known that all even perfect numbers (except 6) end in 16, 28, 36, 56, 76, or 96 (Lucas 1891) and have digital root 1. In particular, the last digits of the first few perfect numbers are 6, 8, 6, 8, 6, 6, 8, 8, 6, 6, 8, 8, 6, 8, 8, ... (OEIS A094540), where the region between the 38th and 41st terms has been incompletely searched as of June 2004.
The sum of reciprocals of all the divisors of a perfect number is 2, since
|
(22)
|
|
(23)
|
|
(24)
|
If
,
is said to be an
abundant number. If
,
is said to be a deficient
number. And if
for a positive
integer
,
is said to be a
multiperfect number of order
.
The only even perfect number of the form
is 28 (Makowski
1962).
Ruiz has shown that
is a perfect number iff
|
(25)
|

Mandelbrot set

