Can Shaquille O'Neil pin my stripes on for my promotion ceremony? by BigShaqAttack in AirForce

[–]flyryan 16 points17 points  (0 children)

have him wear glasses and a hat

LOL. Also have him chop his legs off at the knees and be about half his normal weight.

/r/netsec's Q2 2016 Information Security Hiring Thread by sanitybit in netsec

[–]flyryan [score hidden]  (0 children)

Tell me what job allows you to work infosec for the government without a clearance. Especially since FFRDCs do classified research.

A SECRET clearance is literally just a background check. It's not that crazy.

/r/netsec's Q2 2016 Information Security Hiring Thread by sanitybit in netsec

[–]flyryan [score hidden]  (0 children)

Because they are a FFRDC and their work is in support of the Government...

Lake Kittamaqundi Panorama by pronto185 in ColumbiaMD

[–]flyryan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You should walk around it! There are signs explaining the name.

Which celebrities killed their careers in a matter of seconds? by invrt in AskReddit

[–]flyryan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He is killing it in The People vs. OJ Simpson on FX right now as OJ.

The 2000 Lasers drop during Eric Prydz's set at Ultra this weekend was absolutely insane by ryankrameretc in electronicmusic

[–]flyryan -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The screen is synced to the music, not the actual time. The only way it would have been actually in sync with the time is if they started everything at the exact right time.

How can someone get fast 10 link Karma? by lovidovidum in AskReddit

[–]flyryan -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Self posts don't even gain karma... And yeah... you are on very thin ice.

MouseJack: Taking over wireless mouses and keyboards [PDF] by yashinm92 in netsec

[–]flyryan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you mean to reply to me? I think you meant to reply to the OP of this chain.

MouseJack: Taking over wireless mouses and keyboards [PDF] by yashinm92 in netsec

[–]flyryan 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No it's not. It's not unencrypted and this doesn't strip the encryption for keyboards. It lets someone add a keyboard to your machine but it doesn't let them read your keystrokes. Don't make this attack into something it's not.

There are plenty of attack vectors to do what you're talking about, but unencrypted IR, RF, and BT are not what the problem is here.

We are Susan Hennessey and Benjamin Wittes, experts on national security law at the Brookings Institution. Ask us anything about the law surrounding Apple v FBI! by SusanHennessey in IAmA

[–]flyryan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To be upfront, this is academic for me because I believe Apple should comply with this specific order. However, I think this is probably the most complicated and nuanced case-study on something like this we've probably ever seen so I'm interested in exploring some of the potential arguments to see if they hold any water. To set the common level, I have a pretty comprehensive understanding of the technical aspects of this issue. I'm definitely not a lawyer though.


I think iOS devices are set simply to reject untrusted certificates unlike Android devices (someone correct me if wrong), so it's just there in this case to certify that just this stuff is actually from Apple, not that it's not malware.

Not totally. While signed software can mean that, in this case, Apple restricts the iPhone from running software that isn't signed by Apple. Apple openly says this signature is how they prevent malicious content from running on your iPhone.

this stuff should only really be created and flashed to the subject phone in this one case

That still doesn't change the argument that it changes what their signature represents. Also, I believe there will absolutely be more cases. Apple will have to roll new code for those devices but they'll have to sign that code all the same.

In the case that a dickbag gets their hands on it as a corporate saboteur or some such, I think Apple should have a reserve certificate to replace the compromised one as soon as they have wind of that and revoke it ASAP

Not quite. Revoking it would mean updating the certificate revocation list. They wouldn't be able to do this until an iOS update. This would mean that every phone, except for ones on the newest iOS, would be vulnerable.

However, this argument against this is totally invalid anyways. I imagine Apple will protect this software just like they currently protect their signing certificate. The assumption should be that anyone who could get the software could also probably get the certificate which would negate the need for the software in the first place (since they could now sign their OWN code).

We are Susan Hennessey and Benjamin Wittes, experts on national security law at the Brookings Institution. Ask us anything about the law surrounding Apple v FBI! by SusanHennessey in IAmA

[–]flyryan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Aren't you the horrible person the ACLU hates?

Edit: Since he didn't reply to this, this is a joke in reference to an actual tweet an ACLU employee wrote.

We are Susan Hennessey and Benjamin Wittes, experts on national security law at the Brookings Institution. Ask us anything about the law surrounding Apple v FBI! by SusanHennessey in IAmA

[–]flyryan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But haven't courts upheld digital signatures as being binding for contracts? Does forcing Apple to use their "we confirm this isn't malware" signature like this cause issues? I know it's not a contractual issue but can the government force Apple to essentially make a false promise?

February update rolling out tomorrow by Wh1plash96 in xboxone

[–]flyryan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For what it's worth, I kicked off this issue a few months ago and it ended up affecting a lot of people:

http://forums.xbox.com/xbox_support/xbox_one_support/f/4277/p/2065866/5581534.aspx#5581534

It's finally fixed in this update though.