Twitter | Szukaj | |
Inst for Science
Think tank focused on nuclear nonproliferation. Employing science in pursuit of peace since 1993.
14 212
Tweety
464
Obserwowani
9 315
Obserwujący
Tweety
Użytkownik Inst for Science podał dalej
Matthew RJ Brodsky 10 godz.
I’m not sure why this thread hasn’t been retweeted at least a thousand times but it needs to be read and understood by many. Well done 👇🏼
Reply Retweet Lubię
Użytkownik Inst for Science podał dalej
Jonathan Cheng 11 godz.
Democratic Senators to Trump: Any deal with N. Korea must completely dismantle Pyongyang’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs permanently—oh, and please keep us in the loop on plans before negotiations ­begin.
Reply Retweet Lubię
Użytkownik Inst for Science podał dalej
Andrea Stricker 14 godz.
While not something we should dismiss, we have 7 mos at least for Iran to reach a breakout capability using IR-2m centrifuges and an Iran that would not want to invite a military strike. Khamenei is likely trying to ratchet up pressure on Europe.
Reply Retweet Lubię
Użytkownik Inst for Science podał dalej
Omri Ceren 19 godz.
Team Obama & rest of Iran deal echo chamber said after Netanyahu presentation they already knew all of it, there was nothing new to them, etc. Everyone assumes that's just dishonest damage control. But what if they're telling truth & they legalized Iran's nuclear program anyway?
Reply Retweet Lubię
Inst for Science 20 godz.
UN nuclear chief says work in N. Korea could resume quickly | AP
Reply Retweet Lubię
Inst for Science 22 godz.
Relief for North Korea only after clear, irreversible steps to denuclearization: Mattis | Reuters
Reply Retweet Lubię
Inst for Science 22 godz.
W odpowiedzi do @TheGoodISIS
8. Read more from the Express UK, which does not require a subscription:
Reply Retweet Lubię
Inst for Science 22 godz.
W odpowiedzi do @TheGoodISIS
7. Albright "also called for international inspectors to monitor nuclear facilities in Iran, stating: 'The IAEA has done that in both South Africa and Taiwan, after they ended their nuclear weapons programmes.'”
Reply Retweet Lubię
Inst for Science 22 godz.
W odpowiedzi do @TheGoodISIS
6. Albright: “[Findings] would parallel my understanding of the decision to build the Fordow underground enrichment plant that I have assessed a few years ago was likely designed to make weapon-grade uranium, based in part on inspector findings when they first visited the plant”
Reply Retweet Lubię
Użytkownik Inst for Science podał dalej
Mark Dubowitz 22 godz.
✍️ thread on Iran nukes
Reply Retweet Lubię
Inst for Science 22 godz.
W odpowiedzi do @TheGoodISIS
5. The AEOI would evidently produce the three percent enriched uranium in its secret Natanz enrichment plant. There is no date on the paper but the Israelis have assessed that it is likely 2001.
Reply Retweet Lubię
Inst for Science 22 godz.
W odpowiedzi do @TheGoodISIS
4. The document orders the transfer of responsibility to the Defense Ministry for the task of further enriching uranium hexafluoride from three percent to over 90 percent, or weapon-grade.
Reply Retweet Lubię
Inst for Science 22 godz.
W odpowiedzi do @TheGoodISIS
3. More details about the documents seen by Albright: A new document released by Israel is a draft agreement signed byetween the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI), then headed then by Reza Aghazadeh, and the Iranian Defense Ministry, headed then by Ali Shamkhari.
Reply Retweet Lubię
Inst for Science 22 godz.
W odpowiedzi do @TheGoodISIS
2. "Iran said there had only been feasibility and scientific studies but what we see is that Iran ran a fully fledged nuclear weapons programme and that it followed directions from the political levels," [said the Israeli intelligence expert.]
Reply Retweet Lubię
Inst for Science 22 godz.
1. The Times: "What Iran told the International Atomic Energy Agency about its capacities was almost comical compared to what we have here,’ said an Israeli intelligence expert who has studied the documents."
Reply Retweet Lubię
Inst for Science 22 godz.
North Korea sacks top three military officials, as nuclear summit nears | The Guardian
Reply Retweet Lubię
Użytkownik Inst for Science podał dalej
Andrea Stricker 22 godz.
This is big from a historical perspective and raises the urgency of the IAEA being able to get to the bottom of Iran’s past military nuclear activities today and provide a full accounting that efforts have ended. Shows too that the Iran atomic archive contains new information.
Reply Retweet Lubię
Inst for Science 22 godz.
ICYMI: “Iran continued to undertake...efforts to obtain goods and know-how to be used for the development of weapons of mass destruction and to optimize corresponding missile delivery systems,” said a German intelligence document, reviewed by
Reply Retweet Lubię
Inst for Science 23 godz.
Albright to The Times: “If [Iran] refuses [to allow IAEA inspections to ensure the end of its past nuclear weapons program] then the Iran agreement should be discarded and the world should return to a pressure campaign and the re-imposition of sanctions.”
Reply Retweet Lubię
Inst for Science 23 godz.
Albright quoted: Benjamin Netanyahu takes Iran's secret nuclear files to Europe | The National
Reply Retweet Lubię