The original question title asked:
Are 80% of Ninth Circuit judgements overturned by the Supreme Court?
No. Asked like that, the rate is between .1% and .2%.
The quoted claim is
The 9th Circuit Court has been overturned 80% of the time.
Which would be better stated as: of the cases from the 9th Circuit that have been reviewed by the Supreme Court, 80% are overturned. This is misleading in that many people will hear the first claim. The wording is overly ambiguous.
As @DavePhD posted the "overturn" rate statistic of 80% is correct. The problem is that not all cases are reviewed. So there might be a 114,199 cases, 175 are reviewed, and 140 are overturned. 140 is 80% of 175, but it is far less than 1% of the overall cases. That rate is between .1% and .2%.
USCourts.gov says:
In fact, the Court accepts 100-150 of the more than 7,000 cases that it is asked to review each year.
Obviously 150/7500 is only 2%. 80% of that would only be 1.6%. And of course, not every case is brought to the Supreme Court for Review. Numbers just for illustration -- the actual rate may differ somewhat.
The Supreme Court says:
The Court receives approximately 7,000-8,000 petitions for a writ of certiorari each Term. The Court grants and hears oral argument in about 80 cases.
It's not clear why the difference in numbers between the two sources. Regardless, the point is that the court does not hear most of the cases where review is requested, much less most of the cases issued by the circuits.
Note that in the context of the travel pause stay, it's not as misleading as it first seems. While only a small percentage of the overall judgments are overturned, a high percentage of those requiring review are overturned. This will almost certainly require review, as there is a conflict in the district courts of different circuits. A court in Seattle issued the stay while a court in Boston ruled the actions constitutional. The only way to resolve conflicts in different circuits is for the national court to rule. The Supreme Court is the national court. The term is circuit split.
The locution used in the quotes is skipping a step. In a random case, it's a big step. In this particular case, not quite as big. But 80% is still a high estimate at this point in the process.
As a side note, one of the reasons why the 9th Circuit has a high overturn rate is that it is too large for en banc review to proceed easily. So more litigants try to get a Supreme Court review without the step of en banc review. The 9th might have better statistics if it overturned some of its three judge panels itself, like the other circuits do. There have been some recent reforms that may help with that going forward, but that's unlikely to affect this particular case.