Mathematica Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Mathematica. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

How can new integration strategies algorithms be used with NIntegrate?

This is a different type of extension that the extensions with new integration rules, as described in the answer for the question "How to implement custom integration rules for use by NIntegrate?". (Integration strategies perform and guide the core integration process, using or leveraging different integration rules and/or preprocessing algorithms.)

share|improve this question

Motivation (for a new semi-symbolic integration strategy)

Consider the following integral, which cannot be done neigther by Integrate:

Integrate[BesselJ[y, x^3], {x, 0, \[Infinity]}, {y, 0, 1}]

(* Integrate[If[Re[y] > -(1/3), Gamma[1/6 + y/2]/(3*2^(2/3)*Gamma[5/6 + y/2]), 
     Integrate[BesselJ[y, x^3], {x, 0, Infinity}, 
   Assumptions -> Re[y] <= -(1/3)]], {y, 0, 1}] *)

nor NIntegrate:

NIntegrate[BesselJ[y, x^3], {x, 0, \[Infinity]}, {y, 0, 1}, 
 Method -> {"GlobalAdaptive", "MaxErrorIncreases" -> 2000}]

NIntegrate::slwcon: Numerical integration converging too slowly;

NIntegrate::eincr: The global error of the strategy GlobalAdaptive has ...

(* 0.524338 *)

Here is a plot of the integrand function over (much smaller) domain:

Plot3D[BesselJ[y, x^3], {x, 0, 10}, {y, 0, 1}, PlotPoints -> {100, 10}, 
 MaxRecursion -> 5, PlotRange -> All, BoxRatios -> {10, 3}]

enter image description here

Because of the oscillatory nature of the integrand we can see why NIntegrate has difficulties.

On the other hand, Integrate can find the value of the integral integrating over $x$:

In[14]:= Integrate[BesselJ[y, x^3], {x, 0, \[Infinity]}]

Out[14]= ConditionalExpression[Gamma[1/6 + y/2]/(3*2^(2/3)*Gamma[5/6 + y/2]), 
 Re[y] > -(1/3)]

but it has problems integrating over $y$:

In[15]:= Integrate[BesselJ[y, x^3], {y, 0, 1}]

Out[15]= Integrate[BesselJ[y, x^3], {y, 0, 1}]

Since Integrate can do partially the integral along of the axis, we can just take that symbolic expression and give it to NIntegrate for integration over the other axis.

Semi-symbolic NIntegrate implementation

Here we make an integration strategy that combines Integrate and NIntegrate and uses Integrate over some of integration range(s) and NIntegrate for the symbolic expressions obtained by Integrate for the rest of the range(s).

The following defintion is for the initialization of the integration strategy SemiSymbolic.

Clear[SemiSymbolic];
Options[SemiSymbolic] = {"AnalyticalVariables" -> {}};
SemiSymbolicProperties = Options[SemiSymbolic][[All, 1]];
SemiSymbolic /: 
  NIntegrate`InitializeIntegrationStrategy[SemiSymbolic, nfs_, ranges_, 
   strOpts_, allOpts_] :=
  Module[{t, anVars},
   t = NIntegrate`GetMethodOptionValues[SemiSymbolic, SemiSymbolicProperties, 
     strOpts];
   If[t === $Failed, Return[$Failed]];
   {anVars} = t;
   SemiSymbolic[First /@ ranges, anVars]
   ];

This is the implementation of the integaration strategy SemiSymbolic:

SemiSymbolic[vars_, anVars_]["Algorithm"[regions_, opts___]] :=
  Module[{ranges, anRanges, funcs, t},

   ranges = Map[Flatten /@ Transpose[{vars, #@"Boundaries"}] &, regions];
   ranges = Map[Flatten, ranges, {-2}];
   anRanges = Map[Select[#, MemberQ[anVars, #[[1]]] &] &, ranges];
   ranges = Map[Select[#, ! MemberQ[anVars, #[[1]]] &] &, ranges];
   funcs = (#@"Integrand"[])@"FunctionExpression"[] & /@ regions;

   t = MapThread[
     Integrate[#1, Sequence @@ #2, 
       Assumptions -> (#[[2]] <= #[[1]] <= #[[3]] & /@ #3)] &, {funcs, 
      anRanges, ranges}];
   Print["SemiSymbolic::Integrate's result:", t];

   If[! FreeQ[t, Integrate], Return[$Failed]];

   Total[MapThread[
     NIntegrate[#1, Sequence @@ #2 // Evaluate, 
       Sequence @@ DeleteCases[opts, Method -> _] // Evaluate] &, {t, ranges}]]
   ];

(Note the implementation prints the intermediate result obtained by Integrate.)

Signatures

Initialization

We can see that the new rule SemiSymbolic is defined through TagSetDelayed for SemiSymbolic and NIntegrate`InitializeIntegrationStrategy. The rest of the arguments are:

nfs -- numerical function objects; several might be given depending on the integrand and ranges;

ranges -- a list of ranges for the integration variables;

strOpts -- the options given to the strategy;

allOpts -- all options given to NIntegrate.

Algorithm

StrategySymbol[strategyData___]["Algorithm"[regions_, opts___]] := ...

The algorithm can use regions objects as described in this answer of "Determining which rule NIntegrate selects automatically".

Remarks

Testing SemiSymbolic

The strategy works without (observable) problems for the motivational integral:

In[85]:= NIntegrate[BesselJ[y, x^3], {x, 0, Infinity}, {y, 0, 1}, 
 Method -> {SemiSymbolic, "AnalyticalVariables" -> {x}}]

During evaluation of In[85]:= SemiSymbolic::Integrate's result:{(2^-y HypergeometricPFQ[{1/6+y/2},{7/6+y/2,1+y},-(1/4)])/((1+3 y) Gamma[1+y])}

Out[85]= 0.371471

Note, the printout for the intermediate result by Integrate.

Since SemiSymbolic passes inside its body the non-method NIntegrate options it was invoked with we can also see the sampling points used by SemiSymbolic using EvaluationMonitor.

res = 
 Reap@NIntegrate[BesselJ[y, x^3], {x, 0, Infinity}, {y, 0, 1}, 
   Method -> {SemiSymbolic, "AnalyticalVariables" -> {x}}, 
   EvaluationMonitor :> Sow[{x, y}]]

During evaluation of In[78]:= SemiSymbolic::Integrate's result:{(2^-y HypergeometricPFQ[{1/6+y/2},{7/6+y/2,1+y},-(1/4)])/((1+3 y) Gamma[1+y])}

(* {0.371471, {{{x, 0.00795732}, {x, 0.0469101}, {x, 
     0.122917}, {x, 0.230765}, {x, 0.360185}, {x, 0.5}, {x, 
     0.639815}, {x, 0.769235}, {x, 0.877083}, {x, 0.95309}, {x, 
     0.992043}, {x, 0.00397866}, {x, 0.023455}, {x, 0.0614583}, {x, 
     0.115383}, {x, 0.180092}, {x, 0.25}, {x, 0.319908}, {x, 
     0.384617}, {x, 0.438542}, {x, 0.476545}, {x, 0.496021}, {x, 
     0.503979}, {x, 0.523455}, {x, 0.561458}, {x, 0.615383}, {x, 
     0.680092}, {x, 0.75}, {x, 0.819908}, {x, 0.884617}, {x, 
     0.938542}, {x, 0.976545}, {x, 0.996021}}}} *)

ListPlot[res[[2, 1, All, 2]], Frame -> True]

enter image description here

Further tests

Below are some other tests / examples.

In[50]:= NIntegrate[x^2 + y^2 + z^2, {x, 0, 1}, {y, 0, 1}, {z, 0, 1}, 
 Method -> {SemiSymbolic, "AnalyticalVariables" -> {x, y}}]

During evaluation of In[50]:= SemiSymbolic::Integrate's result:{2/3+z^2}

Out[50]= 1.

Note that the symbolic integration was done over two variables.

In[66]:= res = 
 Reap@NIntegrate[x^2 + y^2 + z^2, {x, 0, 1}, {y, 0, 2}, {z, 0, 10}, 
   Method -> {SemiSymbolic, "AnalyticalVariables" -> {x}}, 
   EvaluationMonitor :> Sow[{y, z}]]

During evaluation of In[66]:= SemiSymbolic::Integrate's result:{1/3+y^2+z^2}

Out[66]= {700., {{{1., 5.}, {1.35857, 5.}, {0.641431, 5.}, {1.94868, 
    5.}, {0.0513167, 5.}, {1., 6.79284}, {1., 3.20716}, {1., 
    9.74342}, {1., 0.256584}, {1.94868, 9.74342}, {1.94868, 
    0.256584}, {0.0513167, 0.256584}, {0.0513167, 9.74342}, {0.311753,
     1.55876}, {0.311753, 8.44124}, {1.68825, 1.55876}, {1.68825, 
    8.44124}}}}

In[69]:= ListPlot[res[[2, 1]], Frame -> True]

enter image description here

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.