Humans are prone to violence so we have learned that peace is hard-won. Religious groups with potent convictions intensify everything, stimulating both violent acts and movements for peace and justice.

IBCSR creatively employs psychological, anthropological, social, and economic analyses, big-data sources, statistical modeling, and computer simulation to understand religious extremist violence.

REVP aims to understand the sources and dynamics of religious extremist violence, to predict where and when it is most likely to flare up, to identify how to avoid it and how to arrest it when it starts.

Biological sex matters in religion. So do the social roles we call gender identities. The Sex Differences & Religion Project investigates precisely how sex and gender matter for the evolution of religion; for the diverse cultural expressions of religion; and for all-too-familiar contemporary debates surrounding women's rights, gender equality, the biological reality of intersex, and the role of transgender people in contemporary societies.

For example, when a woman leaves her family to get married and live with her husband's family (a patrilocal post-marital residence pattern), women are more likely to support religious ritual practices that consolidate friendship and support. Similarly for men in cultures with matrilocal customs. The ripple effects within religion are far-reaching, codifying gender differences that are diverse across cultures and yet intelligible.

DSP analyzes almost two dozen subdimensions of experiences and practices that people are prepared to call spiritual. We analyze responses in order to detect meaningful clusters of subdimensions, thereby helping both to firm up the meaning of "spirituality" and to uncover the commonalities and differences between our individual spiritual styles.

SRP is a cluster of sub-projects applying computer simulation techniques to the scientific study of religion. Modeling and simulation depends on data, so building and finding datasets is a vital part of SRP.

Extant simulation research in religion has posited very simple human minds, simple interactions, simple behaviors, and simple modes of change. This is for good reasons: excessive complexity in a simulation obscures the relevant lines of causality and we lose cognitive control over our own models. But too much simplicity gives wrong answers, just as too much complexity gives unclear and confused ones. So SRP strives to strike the right balance.

SRP integrates multiple theories of religion and produces tools capable of testing hypotheses about religion’s social and cultural effects. The Simulating Religion Project will try to answer questions such as, “What are the factors that contribute to civilizational transformation?”, “What role does religion play in social change?”, and “How do evolved cognitive, emotional and social tendencies interact?” Simulation techniques permit a newly persuasive approach to such questions, complementing approaches pursued in other disciplines.

QRXP develops methods for measuring the distinctive and sometimes potent cognitive and emotional features of experiences that people are willing to call religious or spiritual. The purpose of this project is to furnish a basis for the comparison of religious and spiritual experiences across demographic groups (such as men and women) and across cultures.

QRXP has built the PCI-RSE - aka "Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory for Religious and Spiritual Experiences" - which functions as its central quantification tool.

The project is funded through the generous support of the John Templeton Foundation, Boston University, and IBCSR.

MRP, a sub-project under the umbrella of IBCSR's Simulation Religion Project, is an ambitious attempt to connect the sciences of modeling and simulation (M&S) and the scientific study of religion (SSR). With generous funding from the John Templeton Foundation, the three years from July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2018 promise intensification of a new kind of research in the academic study of religion.

The first goal of MRP is to produce a simulation development platform that will allow SSR scholars and students to create complex simulations with no programming.

The second goal is to produce a series of simulations of the role of religion in key transformations of human civilization, such as the Agricultural Transition (c. 8000 BCE), the Axial age (c. 800-200 BCE), and modernity (c. 1600-2100).

The third goal is to explain the importance of M&S to experts in religious studies, beginning with SSR. Concerns about reductionism and over-simplification are important and we are addressing them. This outreach effort involves blogs and documentary films.

In the far past of our species right up to the present day, dreams and nightmares have been associated with religion. Some dreams seem to convey religious revelations while others express our religious feelings and thoughts. Some religious practitioners have also cultivated the ability to dream in lucid ways so as to explore the worlds they believe dreaming opens up to them. It's easy to underestimate the importance of dreams for religion if you haven't personally experienced the force of the connection.

DRP investigates the intricate connections between dreams and nightmares, on the one hand, and religion and spirituality, on the other. We employ a wide range of techniques from individual dream narratives to longitudinal dream journals, and from sleep studies to life histories. We aim to tease out the ways dreams and religion are entangled, which will shed light on big questions such as the evolutionary origins of religion and the formation of religious conviction and commitment.

The goal of the MODRN project is to create cutting edge computer simulations of religious and social conflict in Norway, using modeling systems that enable “virtual” social experimentation by integrating empirically validated theories in the scientific study of religion (and of secularization) within complex “causal architectures.” These simulations will be calibrated using massive Norwegian datasets in dialogue with national and international experts in the fields of computer modeling, religious and secular diversification, and Norwegian public-policy.

One of IBCSR's landmark projects, NRCP has pioneered innovative approaches to understanding religious beliefs, behaviors, and practices that combine neuroimaging, in-depth demographics, life histories, and medical evaluations.

One line of inquiry has been in relation to Parkinson's Disease. While helping PD patients understand and cope better with this difficult neuro-degenerative disorder, we are also uncovering the neural systems involved in religious cognition.

This is the opposite of finding a "God Spot" in the human brain; it is more about developing a neuro-cognitive model that expresses the complex way numerous brain systems are combined to express the extraordinarily complex thoughts, emotions, dreams, memories, and behaviors we associate with religion and spirituality.

Religion, Brain & Behavior (RBB) is the flagship journal in the bio-cultural study of religion.

The aim of RBB is to provide a vehicle for the advancement of current bio-cultural approaches to understanding religion at every level, from brain to behavior. RBB unites multiple disciplinary perspectives that share these interests. The journal seeks empirical and theoretical studies that reflect rigorous scientific standards and a sophisticated appreciation of the academic study of religion. RBB welcomes contributions from a wide array of biological and related disciplines, ranging from cognitive science and evolutionary psychology to and religious studies.

RBB publishes high quality research articles, target articles with about ten solicited commentaries and an author response, book symposia with commentaries and an author response, case studies, and occasional review articles. Issues are published four times annually by Taylor & Francis.

RBB was founded by IBCSR Research Associate Rich Sosis, and IBCSR Co-Founders Wesley Wildman and Patrick McNamara. Its current editors are Joseph Bulbulia, Michael Spezio, Rich Sosis, and Wesley Wildman, with assistant editor Joel Daniels.

It's difficult to picture the very distant past, particularly the early phases of civilization where archeologists have to labor away to reconstruct the way our human ancestors lived. The answer, according to the AARP, is 3D animation - archeologically accurate and truly inspiring visualization that can communicate what human life used to be like, at least in one very special place.

Working with our partners in Old Dominion University and with Ian Hodder and other archeologists who study the ancient archeological site in Çatalhöyük, Turkey, we are building an animated world that can also serve as the visualization engine for computer simulations of the role of religion in the transition from small-scale hunter-gather societies to farming in larger towns.

The IBCSR Research Review offers a survey of recently published scientific research related to the bio-cultural study of religion and spirituality and health. The periodical is published by Wesley Wildman for IBCSR and edited by Joel Daniels, IBCSR post-doctoral fellow.

You can register to receive free email editions of IBCSR Research Review using the registration box on the IBCSR home page. Online versions are available, several months after they are published.

IBCSR members have access to a searchable database of publications in the scientific study of religion. This database is a one-stop solution to finding what has been published in the bio-cultural study of religion - including evolutionary religious studies, cognitive science of religion, neuroscience of religion, and spirituality and health - with no extraneous results to sift through on your way to locating the information you seek. The IBCSR Research Review Database contains all entries from all issues of the IBCSR Research Review as well as articles from previous years back to the middle of the nineteenth century, and is expanding all the time.

IBCSR initiated this project in the wake of a highly successful research effort at Boston University called the Cross-Cultural Comparative Religious Ideas Project. The aim of IBCSR's effort is to identify a biologically and cross-culturally intelligible basis for the existence of stable comparative categories.

The attractive payoff here is an empirically grounded basis for speaking to one another across the chasms of cultural, religious, and historical difference. Plenty of people say it's impossible, and plenty say its easy. We think bio-cultural research methods can settle the question and advance dialogue at the same time.