Astronomy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for astronomers and astrophysicists. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

According to me about 99.9 % of the sun-rays that do not fall on any planet or any other celestial body keep on travelling farther and farther unto infinity. Apparently such rays get lost. Keeping in mind the colossal energy Sun has produced since 4.5 billion years I am somehow reluctant to reconcile myself to the idea that Nature would have allowed wastage of so much energy produced by the Sun. Nonetheless I want to get enlightened whether it got really lost or got utilized. If it got utilized I want to know how it may have got utilized at all and whether any sustainable evidence is available in support of any such finding?

share|improve this question
13  
Wait until night. Look up. See all those little points of light? Those are sun-rays from other suns that didn't hit anything, until just now when they happened to hit your eyeball. Now imagine what would happen if your eyeball wasn't there and the Earth was in a slightly different spot. They just keep on going and going and going. – immibis yesterday
6  
Do you believe that nature is an intelligent agent that wants energy to be useful to someone? Where did you come by this curious belief? – Eric Lippert 17 hours ago
    
@EricLippert Actually the idea that nature has no purpose and no goal is a quite modern one. The opposite idea is much older, easier to grasp and if you do not know otherwise, a reasonable assumption at first. – Thorsten S. 16 hours ago
    
You might want to read about the Dyson sphere. – Pete Becker 13 hours ago
    
what is Nature? – njzk2 6 hours ago

The light from the Sun spreads, at least initially, in an isotropic fashion into the universe.

As it gets further from the Sun, some of that light will interact with the interstellar medium (ISM) and therefore some of the energy emitted by the Sun will be used to excite atoms and molecules or even ionise some atoms. This will be the fate of almost all the light which is emitted from the Sun towards the plane of our Galaxy, which contains sufficient molecular gas and dust to block starlight travelling through it for any distance. We know this happens because we can "see" dark clouds in the Milky Way, that can be penetrated by longer wavelength radiation to reveal all the billions of Sun-like stars that lie behind them. Roughly speaking, about half the visible light from the Sun will be absorbed every 1000 light years when travelling in the Galactic plane, so it is essentially all absorbed within a few thousand light years.

But most of the Sun's light is not travelling in the direction of the Galactic plane, and interstellar and intergalactic space has a very low density of gas and dust. The equivalent extinction number for the intergalactic medium is that light travels many billions of light years with almost no chance of being absorbed (see Zu et al. 2010). This means that most of the light from the Sun will travel to cosmological distances (billions of light years) over the course of the next billions of years. Indeed light emitted from the Sun shortly after its birth has already travelled 4.5 billion light years. We know this has happened and will happen, because we can observe galaxies (the light from which is nothing more than the summation of light from many stars like the Sun) that are 4.5 billion (and more) light years away.

As the Sunlight travels towards cosmological distances, its wavelength is "stretched" by the expansion of the universe, becoming redder and redder. We know this happens because distant galaxies have redshifted spectra. If the universe keeps expanding, then its density will continue to decrease and there is little to stop the radiation from the Sun travelling on forever, with a wavelength that scales as the scale factor, $a$, of the universe.

If we follow a co-moving and co-expanding cube containing the Sun's radiation as the universe expands. The total radiative energy inside that cube diminishes as $a^{-1}$ - that is, the energy content of the universe in the form of radiation from stars (and other sources) becomes energetically less important as the universe expands and appears to be being superseded by the energy contained in the vacuum itself (a.k.a. dark energy).

In conclusion, most of the energy emitted by the Sun is not "used" for anything; it propagates into space, becoming more and more dilute.

share|improve this answer
    
Am I incorrect to point out that light emitted 4.5 billion years ago has indeed (from its reference) traveled 4.5 billion lightyears, but is much more than 4.5 billion lightyears as measured in ours? – Nij yesterday
    
@Nij yes I think you are correct, the "wavefront" ends up being more than 4.5 billion light years away because of the expansion of space. – Rob Jeffries yesterday
    
The force of gravity is infinite, but it get exponentially weaker. Wouldn't photons orbit everything else, and the universe eventually get a ring of photons much in the same way that Saturn has dust rings? – BlackCap 1 hour ago

You want nature to be frugal and efficient. You want all the energy of the sun to have a purpose. However what you want nature to be like has no bearing on what it is.

The light from the sun is a colossal amount of energy in human terms, but very minor in comparison to the rest of the universe. The light that didn't fall onto anything left the solar system and was never "used".

The root of your misunderstanding is that you think that the sun has a purpose. It does not. It is a ball of plasma that emits energy.

share|improve this answer
1  
This doesn't really make much attempt to answer the question, in the way that Rob's answer does. Only the second sentence of the second paragraph lightly addresses the question. – JBentley yesterday
13  
The question is about whether the energy is "utilized". Rob's answer discusses whether the energy is absorbed or redshifted. It doesn't address the issue of "use". Use implies purpose. My answer addresses the question better than Rob's since he doesn't answer the central misconception: the idea that nature is wasteful. – James K yesterday
1  
His use of the word "utilized" merely highlights flaws in the OP's understanding. The title of the question is, "what happens to...?". The idea that the light is not "utilized" comes from the OP's misconception that it is "lost". Addressing what actually does happen to these "missing" light rays takes care of the misunderstanding and addresses the real question, at the same time. Your answer points out the misunderstanding, but does not grant the reader any new understanding. The OP will still have the same question, perhaps slightly rephrased now. – JBentley yesterday
8  
This answer doesn't seem helpful, just condescending. – BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft yesterday
4  
@BlueRaja-DannyPflughoeft More than seems, I think it pretty much is condescending. "You want...", "You want...", "...you want...", "The root of your misunderstanding..." I think the up votes are less "this is a high quality answer" and more secondary smoke from vicarious flaming. I don't see any helpful information about astronomy here. – uhoh 18 hours ago

Entropy is a fundamental condition of our universe, and has been recognized as such since as long ago as Newton's laws of thermodynamics.

Entropy: Order does not increase over time, it decreases, except locally with the expenditure of energy. This expenditure trades off increased disorder elsewhere for increased order locally, and the tradeoff is always negative: The amount of order gained is always smaller than the amount of disorder created.

Each emitted photon either keeps moving until the end of Time as we know it, slowly losing energy as the cosmos expands, or else, it interacts with other particles along the way. However, the notion that those interactions, or the lack of interactions, implies greater and lesser degrees of Utility or of Purpose or of Destiny is a metaphysical one, not an astronomy question or even a physics question.

share|improve this answer

The magic sky-people collect it and store it up unicorn's asses... until it is needed by zombie carpenters and seraphim, for cheese-making and the like. Cuz... magic and such.

share|improve this answer

protected by James K 1 hour ago

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.