Arjun Singh

On the same date, she kowtow to #CCP #PLA like a dog bitch begging for a biscuit. Shameful!https://twitter.com/lifang072/status/1145551175149920256 …

When you miss the point and try to school the professorhttps://twitter.com/goldencaskcap/status/1146127920525500416 …

"I live in a place that achieved independence after bloody uprisings but it's not right for YOU to hurt a building" seems to be the anthem of the Twitter masses

Look at these kids. Keep this in mind when pro-CCP media spin this into riots and violence.https://twitter.com/Gr33nGKH/status/1145742243526955008 …

9. Whether you support what happened today or not, this is not an excuse to take off the pressure now and concede. Hong Kong needs another huge protest, QUICK, to show that they have the stamina to keep fighting this battle for the city.

8. 5) The origins of this action started many years back. Today was just another expression of how much Hong Kongers are willing to fight for their city, despite the huge odds against them. - The MOST IMPORTANT THING THOUGH IS TO GET OUT AND PROTEST AGAIN - S O O N!

7. 4) Items not related to ruling, like artefacts and libraries inside LEGCO were not touched. This was not wonton violence or a riot. It was a targeted poltical attack on the instruments of government.

6. 3) No private property was destroyed. People even paid for drinks in the LEGCO canteen.

5. 2) Much government property was destroyed. In a social uprising like this, government property and the instruments of ruling are legitimate targets for destruction.

4. 1) This was a non-violent take over of a government building. Unlike yesterday's pro-police march, no one was assaulted, attacked or threatened.

Even if the police 'win' this battle & clear people from the streets, as they probably will, they've sunk #HK even deeper in crisis, with all of the outstanding issues of politics, rights & accountability unresolved.

People who say there were no underlying crimes and therefore the president could not have intended to illegally obstruct the investigation—and therefore cannot be impeached—are resting their argument on several falsehoods:

Here are my principal conclusions: 1. Attorney General Barr has deliberately misrepresented Mueller’s report. 2. President Trump has engaged in impeachable conduct. 3. Partisanship has eroded our system of checks and balances. 4. Few members of Congress have read the report.

Elizabeth Warren is wrong. When a business earns a profit it takes nothing out, so there's nothing it needs to put back in. Profit is a measure of how much value a business adds to society. It's welfare recipients who take from society and who should be required to give back!

Debt-financed tax cuts put more money in consumer's pockets. But since they result in higher interest rates and consumer prices, the extra cash does nothing to raise overall living standards. In fact, for most people, the cost of living will rise more than their paychecks!