Titus Brown

@ctitusbrown

Tripping the light academic. Titus is a professor in the School of VetMed at UC Davis.

A secure, hidden bunker.
impactstory.org/u/0000-0001-60…
가입일: 2009년 3월
사진 및 동영상 325개 사진과 동영상

트윗

@ctitusbrown 님을 차단했습니다

정말로 이 트윗을 보시겠어요? 트윗을 봐도 @ctitusbrown 님의 차단을 해제하지 않습니다

  1. 님이 리트윗했습니다
    23시간 전

    But Nate, this is akin to saying black people in Montgomery should not have boycotted busses because white people were already boycotting black schools. The fact that a tactic can be used for just or unjust purposes doesn’t mean you should never engage it.

    In fact, I am gay, and I'm just old enough (40) to remember when conservative groups urged boycotts of advertisers and networks who were seen as promoting LGBTQ or other "nontraditional" lifestyles. That strongly influences my views on this subject!
    답글 103개 리트윗 1,566개 9,718 마음
    취소
  2. 님이 리트윗했습니다
    22시간 전

    It's important to acknowledge what is saying. He's willing to discard one of the few tactics that is creating consequences for the harmful rhetoric on the right. He's willing to allow that rhetoric to flourish because of some *imagined* threat to him.

    답글 2개 리트윗 50개 204 마음
    이 스레드 보기
    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  3. 님이 리트윗했습니다
    30분 전
    님, 님에게 보내는 답글

    It’s academia, and we act like we’re trauma surgeons.

    답글 3개 리트윗 4개 14 마음
    취소
  4. 님이 리트윗했습니다
    2시간 전

    The replies to this 😂

    Due to my grad school experience, when I die I want my body donated to Science. And by Science, of course, I mean the journal Science. I want my dead body delivered to their offices.
    리트윗 13개 21 마음
    취소
  5. 님이 리트윗했습니다
    23시간 전

    Due to my grad school experience, when I die I want my body donated to Science. And by Science, of course, I mean the journal Science. I want my dead body delivered to their offices.

    답글 53개 리트윗 867개 5,918 마음
    취소
  6. 님이 리트윗했습니다
    14시간 전

    Our new work on improving sequence bloom trees, with . Further reduction in space and query time.

    Improved Representation of Sequence Bloom Trees
    리트윗 13개 21 마음
    취소
  7. 님이 리트윗했습니다
    12월 18일

    This also means will have roughly 8 (!) hours per day more than her colleagues to spend on legislation, at hearings, reading, writing, doing press, meeting with constituents, etc. Her colleagues schedule is more like the following: /1

    Fun Fact: Our campaign has the highest rate small-donor funding of ANY House member in Congress! Being people-funded frees me to support policies that put people FIRST, and speak openly about closing lobbyist loopholes. Join and support our independence:
    답글 60개 리트윗 909개 4,668 마음
    이 스레드 보기
    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  8. 님이 리트윗했습니다
    21시간 전
    님, 님, 님에게 보내는 답글

    Seems to ignore the fact that their concerns got a total and repeated ass-whupping in Nature and other venues (here's a short response form and I) )

    답글 1개 리트윗 3개 5 마음
    취소
  9. 님이 리트윗했습니다
    22시간 전

    "2018 was the year when preprints were first brought to our attention". What planet have been living on? Preprints in the current sense have been around for literally decades (ArXiv et al since 1990s) and hardcopy working papers have existed since forever.

    <thread> I’m disappointed by the fixation that has developed over preprints... (1)
    이 스레드 보기
    답글 3개 리트윗 7개 11 마음
    이 스레드 보기
    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  10. 님이 리트윗했습니다
    12월 18일

    Its with great pleasure to announce this resource to the community. DAWN: a resource for yielding insights into the diversity among wheat genomes

    답글 8개 리트윗 23개 42 마음
    이 스레드 보기
    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  11. 님이 리트윗했습니다
    12월 18일

    Thanks to everyone who made the a huge success in 2018! We wish you and your families a happy holiday season and an even brighter new year!

    리트윗 8개 14 마음
    취소
  12. 님이 리트윗했습니다
    12월 18일

    Highly recommend this thread to see the dangers that headline-grabbing papers have on the way journals are judged. Being correct may not have generated as many citations as being wrong but headline-grabbing.

    So, how did I like "post-publication peer review"? IMO, the 6 month long process has done nothing useful, except provide a paywalled citation to the original paper. A paper that should have been fixed in peer review remains unchanged, and is lauded as a top paper of the year.
    이 스레드 보기
    답글 1개 리트윗 8개 11 마음
    취소
  13. 님이 리트윗했습니다
    12월 17일

    Women astronomers have had lower success rates with proposals to use the Hubble Space Telescope. Until they finally tried blind reviewing (so reviewers didn’t know the identity of the proposers), and the discrepancy went away. H/t

    has, for the first time, conducted a completely blind review of telescope proposals- hooray!! The result - completely consistent success rates for men and women, in contrast to significant biases that they found in the past.
    이 스레드 보기
    답글 59개 리트윗 2,473개 4,651 마음
    취소
  14. 님이 리트윗했습니다
    12월 18일

    Great work & presentation by of on governance strategies for open source research software projects. Condensed info from many projects to outline Early, Middle & Later stages of project development & what's needed at different stages.

    답글 1개 리트윗 6개 18 마음
    이 스레드 보기
    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  15. 님이 리트윗했습니다
    12월 18일
    님, 님, 님에게 보내는 답글

    I leave them alone in the basement as they eat other critters. I kill ones I find upstairs, on the theory that Darwinism will remove the ambitious ones out of my houses gene pool

    답글 1개 리트윗 1개 3 마음
    취소
  16. 님이 리트윗했습니다
    12월 18일

    Our workshop in partnership with is now open! Save the date - March 18th to 20th, 2019 - . Workshop will focus on and analyses. 👩‍💻👨‍💻🧬 Apply here : Travel fellowships available. Please RT!

    리트윗 20개 19 마음
    취소
  17. 님이 리트윗했습니다
    12월 18일

    Comp Bio fellowship at - would <3 to see diverse pool of candidates!!

    답글 1개 리트윗 6개 4 마음
    취소
  18. 12월 18일

    I will call him/her/it “bob”

    @ctitusbrown 님에게 보내는 답글
    You have a Scutigera!!
    답글 1개 4 마음
    취소
  19. 12월 18일

    Ok having a journal respond is pretty awesome ;) thx!

    @ctitusbrown 님, @cbahlai 님에게 보내는 답글
    House centipede, I think
    답글 1개 리트윗 1개 1 마음
    취소
  20. 12월 18일

    Never seen this bug before. MANY legs. Rather pretty. But in our house... any ideas what it is!?

    답글 4개
    취소

@ctitusbrown 님은 아직 트윗이 없습니다.

로딩하는데 시간이 지연되고 있습니다.

트위터의 트래픽이 폭주했거나 일시적인 문제가 발생했을 수 있습니다. 다시 시도하거나 트위터 상태 페이지를 방문하여 자세한 내용을 확인해 보세요.

    관심사 추천:

    ·