Essential Studio
Conheça o Essential Studio
O Essential Studio Enterprise Edition do Syncfusion é um conjunto de mais de 1.600 componentes de software e estruturas para o desenvolvimento de aplicativos da Internet, móveis e de desktop. Seus Leia mais controles de interface do usuário (IU) foram projetados para serem flexíveis e otimizados para um alto desempenho, além de contarem com a confiança de mais da metade das empresas da Fortune 500. Com o Syncfusion no kit de ferramentas, é possível acelerar a criação de interfaces de usuário modernas e elegantes e ler e gravar formatos de arquivos comuns. E faça tudo isso com o apoio da dedicada equipe de suporte do Syncfusion. Ver menosQuem usa o Essential Studio?
O Syncfusion se orgulha de atender a uma ampla variedade de clientes, de desenvolvedores individuais a mais da metade das empresas da Fortune 500. Independentemente das suas necessidades ou do seu orçamento, você terá as ferramentas para ajudar no sucesso da sua equipe.
Not sure about Essential Studio?
Compare with a popular alternative
Essential Studio
Other great alternatives to Essential Studio
Avaliações do Essential Studio
Carlos
Melhor Software e Melhores Plugins
Comentários: Foi muito rápido e fácil de usar, pois a documentação é boa e detalhada.
Vantagens:
Facilidade de instalação e inclusão de novos plugins.
Desvantagens:
Pede licença a cada componente, deveria ser gerado uma licença única.
Ray
Complete, robust, fully functional web UI
Comentários: Overall it's a great product. It does everything Telerik Kendo does but is cheaper and therefore a better value.
Vantagens:
The Syncfusion Grid component is as good or better than any other on the market. It has every feature you could want: paging, sorting, filtering, sizing and reordering columns, exporting to PDF, CSV, or Excel. And they have just about every other rich web component you think of: Calendar, sortable list, embedded rich text/HTML editor, charts, maps, you name it. And best of all, their free community license includes ASP.Net MVC so you can develop rich MVC web UI applications. And also includes Xam
Desvantagens:
Although they have extensive documentation, they so many components that do so many things, that not every feature has specific programming examples, so you sometimes have to figure things out through trail and error. And although the MVC components all have tons of methods and parameters you sometimes have to write JavaScript to make it work the way you want. So you need to be a strong programmer.
Lucas
Alternativas consideradas:
Great Product
Comentários: Overall it's been great. As my familiarity with the product increases, my productivity has increased dramatically, which I'm very excited about.
Vantagens:
I love the fact that the software is usable across a broad spectrum of different technologies - Blazor, ASP.NET Core, Javascript, Flutter, etc..
Desvantagens:
The 'immediate' support team could do a better job, but support overall is better than it would first appear. You have to
Timothy
Syncfusion for the StartUp
Comentários: In addition to supporting Xamarin Forms, we are following a strict MVVM methodology and leveraging C# as much as possible across as many platforms as possible. Currently, this includes the most popular standard platforms that Xamarin Forms supports: iOS, Android, UWP. We will also be supporting Blazor (C# in browser web assembly) and one of the Syncfusion features we hope to leverage is their Blazor support. We are waiting for .NET 5 GA to leap into that part of the project, but are hopeful our good experience with Syncfusion componentson Xamarin Forms supported platforms will be matched in the Browser based client using Syncfusion Blazor components.
Vantagens:
Our project is to build a commercial-grade, security-compliant, serverless mobile app platform using only tools that are budget-friendly for startups. Our tool-chain selection includes AWS services (API Gateway, Cognito, Lambda, DynamoDB, ...), Microsoft .NET Core/Standard, Visual Studio and Xamarin. All these tools are essentially free until your app starts scaling. Syncfusion's community edition was chosen because it provides commercial-grade features and doesn't burden the entrepreneur with out-of-pocket expenses until their app is generating revenue. Finally, our experience with Syncfusion's support has been first rate.
Desvantagens:
Syncfusion targets many different UI presentation layers. In our case, we use Xamarin Forms which is relatively new for Syncfusion. The controls are generally solid but do require more "code-behind" work than is generally recommended in the Xamarin community. There are shops that totally refuse to allow "any" code-behind and if you are one of those you may have some issues using all of the Syncfusion controls. In our case, the limited code-behind required is not considered a barrier. In addition, the Syncfusion documentation is obviously not written by a native English speaker and as such can be amusing at times and occasionally annoying .
Ronny
Perfect for my needs
Comentários: I mainly use their Winforms GridControl. First steps are very easy but as soon as you are digging deeper, their online documentation (due to the massive amount of capabilities) is not sufficient and you must open a ticket with their support team. But that's not a problem because they respond in a timely fashion and have solved all my problems/questions. Overall I'm very satisfied with this product.
Vantagens:
Due to the comprehensive Online Documentation and User Forum, the first and basic steps are easy to accomplish.
Desvantagens:
When updating to newer versions and/or updates it is very important that you follow the exact steps, as described in the corresponding documents. Otherwise you will end up in a situation where your app does no longer compile and run.
