Qooling

Qooling helps out!

Komentarze: With Qooling no more stuggle with Excel sheets and Word documents. All requirements can be reached with the use of Qooling.

Zalety:

It is an easy to use tool for many standards. Its look and feel feels right and there are no difficult options. When I contact Qooling with a question or request they answer within 24 hours, most of the times even shorter. Qooling helps a company to really manage QHSE on every level.

Wady:

I can't think of any. All issues are solved untill now.

User friendly, customizable, and affordable!

Komentarze: Ways that my company uses Qooling include: Document control
Issue & change management (for both manufacturing issues and EHS incidents/near misses)
CAPA management
Task management
Quality & safety audits
Equipment (asset) management
Employee training management
Risk assessments The value of Qooling is so self-evident, we were even able to get the software adopted by one of our manufacturing partners.

Zalety:

My title says it all. I led a team that evaluated numerous QMS options. We ended up choosing Qooling because of how user friendly the software is, how customizable it is, and the price. Many QMS softwares offer customization, but not by the end user. Setting up this system did not require a lengthy or expensive customization/implementation phase. My team and I (with virtual support from the Qooling team!) were able to set up the system ourselves. The team at Qooling is extremely responsive to questions, feedback, or recommended improvements, making implementation and maintenance a breeze. Most of the employees at my company have never used a QMS software before. We were able to have all of the lab & engineering staff fully trained and using the system in weeks.

Wady:

The only feature missing from this software is a dedicated change control/management of change module. This wasn't a deal-breaker for us, as we were able to customize the Issues module to also work for logging and tracking controlled changes.

Rozważane rozwiązania alternatywne: TrackWise i Benchmark Risk + Compliance

Powody przejścia na produkt: Qooling: Price, level of customization available to end user, ease of use.

Qooling review

Komentarze: Easy simple device for simple (not too complicated) registrations

Zalety:

With Qooling do you have the possibility to built customized forms with fits to your organisation/company without tehcnical IT support

Wady:

The licence you have to pay for the different roles

Light implementation, but powerful impact

Komentarze: By implementing Qooling in our work flows we have more insight and more control. Reminders to the right people for certain tasks/issues/inspections due are so much more effective over monitoring on timed intervals by only one or two persons. The Qooling support in getting all modules configured to our needs was excellent, from problem solving to training, from examples to hands on importing of data... All was taking care off. Great customer care! Our auditor was very much impressed by Qooling and called it very a powerful tool!

Zalety:

Intuitive software, configurable to meet your own needs, great module for equipment monitoring (maintenance, calibration, inspection)

Wady:

The audit trail is not 100%, not all modules record new entries. It would be great to have a tool to bundle issues and assign the same rootcause and conclusions. Analysis of equipment inspections, maintenance, calbrations on completeness, on timeliness etc would be great.

Rozważane rozwiązania alternatywne: Inception i BizzMine

Powody przejścia na produkt: Qooling: Most intuitive and best fit for the requirements as set.

Clean, simple and effective

Zalety:

User friendly and instinctive - To make this program and the wide use within the company a succes it has te be easy to use and - Qooling succeeded. The respond from support is outstanding and the willingness to learn from it's users is something you don't see everyday from software suppliers in general.

Wady:

Nothing up to now - experience with the software is in the early stage of addaptation within Bayards. When number of (end) users go up I'm sure there will room for improvement.

Rozważane rozwiązania alternatywne: IFS Ultimo

Powody przejścia na produkt: Qooling: Ultimo is a great solution but (for Bayards) overkill in the extend of which we would use it. Also the QHSE aspect of Qooling was a better fit.