SpiraTeamの概要

SpiraTeamは、プログラムとポートフォリオ、要件、リリース、テスト・ケース、問題、ベースライン、ワークフロー、タスクを1つの統合環境で管理することができる、統合ALMシステムです。 カスタマイズ可能な統合ダッシュボードで、主要なプロジェクト情報を管理することで、プロジェクトのライフサイクル全体を管理し、これまで分かれていた開発とテストを同期することができます。

SpiraTeamの対象ユーザー

要件からテスト、納品まで、プログラム全体を管理するための統合ALMシステムを求めている、プロジェクト・マネージャー、ビジネス・アナリスト、品質保証 (QA) マネージャー。

SpiraTeamソフトウェア - 1 SpiraTeamソフトウェア - 2 SpiraTeamソフトウェア - 3 SpiraTeamソフトウェア - 4 SpiraTeamソフトウェア - 5

SpiraTeamをご存知でしょうか?
別の人気製品との比較

SpiraTeam

4.1 (95)
SpiraTeam
$43.50
無料のバージョン
無料のトライアル
108
22
4.0 (95)
4.5 (95)
4.6 (95)
VS.
価格プラン
価格オプション
機能
統合
使いやすさ
価格の妥当性
カスタマーサービス
$7.50
無料のバージョン
無料のトライアル
153
20
4.0 (12,784)
4.3 (12,784)
4.2 (12,784)
この情報が表示されている理由

Other great alternatives to SpiraTeam

Jira
高評価の機能
タスク管理
タスク進捗追跡
プロジェクト計画/スケジューリング
TestRail
高評価の機能
API
レポート/分析
要件管理
monday.com
高評価の機能
プロジェクト管理
営業パイプライン管理
顧客セグメンテーション
Wrike
高評価の機能
ToDoリスト
役割ベース許可
設定可能ワークフロー
Asana
高評価の機能
タスク・スケジューリング
タスク管理
プロジェクト計画/スケジューリング
POMS
高評価の機能
この製品の機能は、まだレビュアーから評価されていません。
ClickUp
高評価の機能
タスク管理
プロジェクト管理
プロジェクト計画/スケジューリング
Keto
高評価の機能
タスク管理
ダッシュボード
リソース管理
Ravetree
高評価の機能
タスク・スケジューリング
タスク進捗追跡
プロジェクト計画/スケジューリング

SpiraTeamのレビュー

評価ポイント

総合評価
4.1
使いやすさ
4.0
カスタマーサービス
4.6
機能
4.4
価格の妥当性
4.5

企業規模(従業員数)別レビュー数

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1,000
  • >1,001
Erin
Erin
のSenior QA Analyst
認証済みLinkedInユーザー
情報技術、情報サービス, 51-200の従業員数
ツール使用期間: 1年以上
投稿者のソース
ソース:GetApp

Great Tool For The Entire Project Life Cycle

5.0 7 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: We have been using SpiraTeam within our organization for quite a few years. SpiraTeam is very easy to use, and is a great way to help track, maintain and troubleshoot an entire project, from the planning stages, to implementation, to enhancement requests and software bug and defect resolution. I would recommend SpiraTeam to any organization looking for a straightforward, easy to use tool.

良いポイント:

Pros: Easy to use Versatile Tracks multiple project points

改善してほしい点:

Cons: Cannot easily move artifacts from one project to another.

Juan
南アフリカのTest Engineer
情報技術、情報サービス, 10,000+の従業員数
ツール使用期間: 2年以上
投稿者のソース

検討した類似製品:

Capitec Bank Feedback

5.0 3 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: Most excellent, brings our Business and testing together in understanding the req.

良いポイント:

The Software made Automation easier. Integration easy, total revolutionary product. Very powerful tool if used as designed.

改善してほしい点:

Users. Misunderstanding the designed use compared to their personal opinion.

Daniel
Daniel
スペインのArchitect IT
情報技術、情報サービス, 自営業
ツール使用期間: 6~12か月
投稿者のソース

A complete vision of the projects

3.0 6 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: I was used SpiraTeam in some projects. Our work with the application was right, but our experience with it, is like a fixed application with a strongest modulation of the project process. The UI, is not very friendly with a complex form to work on it.
Is true, that you can add any document, requirement, task or other in each moment, but you cannot change the flow of the project. In action it is maddening because you has not clarity of the steps to do with the different parts of the project.
But, if you have a big project with many people that need to interact (for example, you need to follow the status of the tasks and the test cases by developer) it is your project application.

良いポイント:

The application can modify to adapt the workflow to your needs (based on a complex workflow). The document management is very good. You can change a part of UI (colors, logos, etc.). You can do a personal dashboard with your heat points. This could help you to focus your most important points.

改善してほしい点:

In my personal opinion, the application needs a guidance or a screen that can show the flow process to make more easy the entry of the project elements.

Inflectraからの返信

6 年前

Thanks for the feedback. We are adding a new user onboarding wizard into SpiraTeam to guide a new user through the project management process that is enabled in SpiraTeam. We're not sure which version Daniel used, but v5.0 has a completely overhauled user interface which our users are loving.

Peter
英国のTest Analyst
金融サービス, 51-200の従業員数
ツール使用期間: 2年以上
投稿者のソース

SpiraTeam - The HP ALM/HPQC Killer

4.0 2 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: My philosophy is that the tool should fit the project, not the other way round, so I use SpiraTeam as and when the project requires. All my tests begin life as Excel checklists. If we have specific requirements then I will make use of the Requirements and map them to Test Scripts to get full traceability from a requirements, through testing, through defect management to reporting of test coverage. We write and maintain our own legacy systems, so most of our projects only have high level requirements, hence there is little point using the full suite of SpiraTeam, as it is overkill for such small projects. For most projects, SpiraTeam is used as more of a project place holder at a very high level to track project details and capture any requirements documentation. It is inefficient to write test scripts in Excel for small projects and import them in to SpiraTeam and execute them from SpiraTeam, as this is a needless duplication of effort. I've implemented Exploratory Testing, so test scripts are high level one-liners, reading more like a checklist than a typical Step 1, Step 2, Step 3 style of test scripts. Familiarity with our own in-house software renders the need to write detailed step by step tests redundant. When new legislation is passed that we must comply with, I use SpiraTeam for Test Management to dot the I's and cross the T's, making use of requirements capture, test scripting, requirements mappings, test execution, defect management and Reporting.

良いポイント:

Easier and more user-friendly to use than HP ALM/QC, whilst offering a similar level of comprehensive features, for a lot less outlay than HP's ALM/QC, IBM, CompuWare etc. SpiraTeam is flexible enough to be used differently for each project. For example, SpiraTeam can be used as a document repository for one project, just a test script and test execution tool for another, and as a full blown project life cycle tool encompassing requirements, tests, defects, management and reporting functions. The support provided by Inflectra is head and shoulders above the competition, showing the big boys how it should be done. Responses are prompt and with plenty of examples relevant to your industry sector to help get you going. Don't be surprised if [SENSITIVE CONTENT HIDDEN] himself replies to your support request. It seems that the company's sales team are well versed in using the software tools that they sell. For us, it is the support that wins out over any rivals. Pricing is clear and upfront, unlike some of the smoke and mirrors sales tactics used by other vendors who shall remain nameless but here are some hints ... Has Problems, It Breaks More and Don't Expect to Last Long.

改善してほしい点:

Upgrading from 5.4 to 6.0 fails. In the past upgrading other vendor tools has been a deal breaker when it failed. A tool should be able to upgrade itself without throwing any SQL errors or similar. Administrators and DBA's should not need to run any specific scripts or commands, the tool should do this automatically and without error. We are unable to take advantage of new features offered in 6.0 and beyond. Integration of any test tool with a business is not easy because the tool forces you to work its way rather than the tool supporting existing processes. I needed to write a VB script to translate/transpose my test scripts into the correct format for importing into SpiraTeam, as a consequence of the tool forcing the tester to work how the tool works.

Tom
アメリカのQA Engineer
通信, 1,001-5,000の従業員数
ツール使用期間: 2年以上
投稿者のソース

Pretty Good!

4.0 6 年前

製品を使ってみた感想: Overall, I like SpiraTeam. There's a bunch of different ALM solutions out there. I prefer something easy of a lot of confusing functionality. SpiraTeam is somewhere in the middle. It has a good balance. I use it for keeping track of test cases, but don't use the requirements functionality. I wish we did use the Requirement functionality, but the developers I work with have a thing about NOT documenting what they are developing... In any case, I can produce the results of the test effort rather easily so the rest of the team can see where we are within the project.
Some of the annoyances are the ability to produce a report and distribute to the rest of the team. With the templates that SpiraTeam provides, I would like something a lit bit different. The templates just don't provide the information that I need. I know there is a way to modify the templates, but never had time to devote to figure it out. Also, the way arranging tests in folders and then moving tests around in the folders has been difficult over the versions of SpiraTeam. I like how tests are arranged in that way. It helps keep everything organized in a good manner, but the implementation of it is not entirely perfect. test cases often get put in the wrong place and have to spend some time moving them around. My last annoyance is how test cases are copied and pasted. When pasting a test case, it places it on the top of the test case I copied, not underneath it. That bugs me more than anything.
But when judging SpiraTeam as a whole, I do like the product, but it's those little interface annoyances that get in the way.

良いポイント:

I like the concept of how test cases are arranged, within folders.

改善してほしい点:

I don't like how the concept of the folders was implemented. Often times, when copying and pasting test cases, it gets placed in the wrong location. Have to spend extra time getting test cases and folders placed in the right location.

Inflectraからの返信

6 年前

Hi Tom Thanks so much for the very fair and detailed review, we appreciate the time you spent writing it. I would like to mention that in SpiraTeam v5.0 we completely overhauled the test case and test set folders in line with the issues you identified, so please try out the newest version and let us know if you have any suggestions or feedback.