Contractor Foreman

Easy to use, fast support responses, and value for money

Vorteile:

Price is amazing. Ease of use. Customer support is fast and seem to be eager to assist. What I love the most is I can request/suggest items from the desktop version be added to the mobile version. I have made 2-3 suggestions and I have seen all my suggestions integrated into the mobile version. I have had issues with the software a couple of times. I would create a support ticket with my issues and literally within minutes to just a couple of hours there would be an update pushed for the app and the issue was repaired. This software does pretty much everything you need it to do. I am extremely satisfied with my purchase. I tried several different applications and ConstructionForeman is and was by far the easiest to use and delivered alot more bang for the buck!

Nachteile:

All my cons have been addressed so far through updates. I would like to see the mobile version have the ability to do everything the desktop version does as I use my phone for 95% of my business.

A deep dive into Contractor Foreman

Kommentare: Overall my experience has been good. I cannot say enough how much this company's ATTITUDE toward improving their product impresses me. This alone will keep me coming back every year

Vorteile:

Best 'bang for buck' of any construction management software, period. Damn good challenger to a lot of CRM software as well.Als, and this cannot be said enough; Of all the myriad different systems I have used over the last 20 years, Contractor Foreman seems to not only be better, but more serious and dedicated to continuous improvements to their platform. THAT will make for the best app, not just today but every year it continues this practice. This is how I run MY company and I consider it the only sane way to do so if you want to have a lifespan of more than a few years.

Nachteile:

Yup, there IS a learning curve, which can be steep if you have never run this kind of software.Also; CF currently does an 'on-site' app better than anyone I know but it still needs workCF has a good timekeeping setup, it needs to get better at integrating with ALL payroll companies because it's own module is not quite up to snuff yetCF has a decent bidding module, but my own setup is still superior in too many ways to adopt theirs 100% just yet, but I'm close. (Most estimators using this level of software are not as demanding as I am)CF is very good at uploading files, it needs to better at organizing and presenting them better and at salient points in the GUI. (It HAS gotten better recently)

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: Procore, Autodesk Construction Cloud, Striven, Buildertrend und Smartsheet

Warum Contractor Foreman gewählt wurde: Better value in every case

Zuvor genutzte Software: CoConstruct

Gründe für den Wechsel zu Contractor Foreman: Better value, ease of useOf all the myriad different systems I have used over the last 20 years, Contractor Foreman seems to not only be better, but more serious and dedicated to continuous improvements to their platform. THAT will make for the best app, not just today but every year it continues this practice. This is how I run MY company and I consider it the only sane way to do so if you want to have a lifespan of more than a few years.

Looking to save a hudge amout of time

Kommentare: Mostly anticipation at this point. Was supper cool to speak to the [SENSITIVE CONTENT], though. He took our call when one of his trainers had a personal emergency. Hearing the logic of how and why he developed this sounded just like our frustrations and list of needs.

Vorteile:

This looks so amazing, so far it values all the real world things we value. my team is already so stoked. We have so many structures to track, manage and project the problems that must only be relevant to contractors, as no other software seems to understand constructing accounting. Or cyclical project management. So to see these tools has justified our team's deep inner knowing that, YES, these are important, we are not crazy.

Nachteile:

It's a little rough around the edges. Went to add a suggestion, and got an error page instead of a form to fill out. yet, I see that they have even opened up their suggestions to be voted on and hashed out like a forum. so it's not by neglect to my request that the error occurred

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: FreshBooks, Buildertrend und Wave Accounting

Warum Contractor Foreman gewählt wurde: Um... quick books sucksand they are obnoxiously greedy

Zuvor genutzte Software: QuickBooks Desktop Pro, Trello und Microsoft Excel

Gründe für den Wechsel zu Contractor Foreman: Price or better odds of working for our neeeds

Very robust software for a reasonable price

Kommentare: Great customer service and responsiveness from the leadership and service team. Quick onboarding and the guys in the field picked things up pretty quickly.

Vorteile:

I've been using the market-leading competitors for over ten years. I finally got tired of brutal price increases and went looking for a solution. Contractor Foreman was not only more affordable but in many areas, more robust and efficient. The learning curve wasn't easy, but it was reasonable. Most things are intuitive, and there are pretty good tutorials/videos out there for help. Mostly, it just keeps everything in a central location for the whole team to stay connected.

Nachteile:

I don't know if I'd consider it a con, but there are almost too many features. I had to dial things down in the settings to avoid getting overwhelmed. Unlike other construction management/estimating software, it is a little more process driven as opposed to open design. It's a little hard to explain, but the software works best if you follow the path (on hold/bidding/pending/approved/etc) and complete the build steps in the pattern laid out. You can go rogue, but it seems like glitches and problems are more frequent if you do. I guess that means that instead of bringing your system to CF, you have to work with their system. But, it worked fine for me.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: Jira, Trello, Houzz Pro, Buildertrend, monday.com und CoConstruct

Warum Contractor Foreman gewählt wurde: Efficiency and affordability

Zuvor genutzte Software: Buildertrend, monday.com und CoConstruct

Gründe für den Wechsel zu Contractor Foreman: Efficiency and affordability. Better software for a more reasonable price.

Most features, easy to use, great value

Kommentare: The company is committed to improving their product. The software is packed with features and I'm always impressed with how much the software can do. With their constant improvements I feel that they will continue to correct any areas that could be improved.

Vorteile:

The software is easy to implement. It is packed with features. They encourage and take feedback and make monthly updates.

Nachteile:

There are some glitches and some parts of the software are more complicated than they need to be.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: Buildertrend und CoConstruct

Warum Contractor Foreman gewählt wurde: Contractor Foreman has many times more features than CoConstruct at a fraction of the price.

Zuvor genutzte Software: FreshBooks und CoConstruct

Gründe für den Wechsel zu Contractor Foreman: Easy of use, features. Clearly designed by people in the construction field unlike CoConstruct.