ಆಯ್ಕೆಮಾಡಿದರೆ, ನಿಮ್ಮ ನಗರ ಅಥವಾ ನಿಖರ ಸ್ಥಳದಂತಹ ಸ್ಥಳ ಮಾಹಿತಿಯನ್ನು ವೆಬ್ ಅಥವಾ ಮೂರನೇ-ಪಾರ್ಟಿ ಅಪ್ಲಿಕೇಶನ್ಗಳಿಂದ ನೀವು ಸೇರಿಸಬಹುದು. ನಿಮ್ಮ ಟ್ವೀಟ್ ಸ್ಥಳ ಇತಿಹಾಸವನ್ನು ಅಳಿಸುವ ಆಯ್ಕೆಯನ್ನು ನೀವು ಸದಾ ಹೊಂದಿರುತ್ತೀರಿ. ಇನ್ನಷ್ಟು ತಿಳಿಯಿರಿ
BREAKING: Victory in 2nd Circuit! The court holds that Title VII prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. This supports what we’ve been saying all along. Everyone deserves the right to be #OutAtWork, and no one should be fired for it. #LGBTQ
"We now hold that sexual orientation discrimination constitutes a form of discrimination 'because of ... sex,' ” in violation of Title VII ..." Read full opinion here: https://www.lambdalegal.org/in-court/legal-docs/ny_zarda_20180226_opinion …pic.twitter.com/CCwp6MFQSg
The case is Zarda v. Altitude Express, & it's A Big Deal, folks! Yet another circuit court joins in affirmation of this essential interpretation of #TitleVII: Sexual orientation discrimination is sex discrimination!pic.twitter.com/oEx6Znz0Y9
Reminder: In July, @TheJusticeDept filed a brief in this case arguing that #TitleVII does NOT prohibit "discrimination based on sexual orientation." The @USEEOC argued that actually, it does. #awkward
TY to the Second Circuit for making the right decision!
I honestly can’t even believe this is still an issue in 2018.
But people do get fired or not promoted because of who they love. Misogyny and race as well as religion still determine if people get hired or fired. Very hard to prove...but it does happen and it’s wrong!
Amazing news!!!
I’m led to wonder... can this be extrapolated to protecting the expression of gender identity?
Yes. At least other case law so supports.
Why we need court intervention to uphold the obvious is a mind-boggling fight that has to be fought on multiple fronts all the time. Yay for the win!!! Kudos to all fight for simple rights!!!
This is great news 
Wonderful!
Next some ridiculous conservative organization will find/create another case in a conservative circuit to perpetuate discrimination and force a conservative biased SCOTUS to decide. Hold on folks, unfortunately this isn’t over.
This is going to SCOTUS no matter what—and when it does, it may very well be facing five conservatives, at least two of whom are Trump appointees. Register, hit the polls, and vote for someone who could actually win. You cannot underestimate how much depends on this fall.
I’m not sure SCOTUS will grant any case cert unless there are conflicting circuit court decisions.
That's one reason they'd hear it, but—and I could be wrong—I think they also choose cases with particular social significance. The right to discriminate is a big one (and Obergefell v. Hodges might have left the four conservatives in a particularly vengeful frame of mind).
You’re correct. There are about 4 ways a case can be granted cert. The most probable in this instance, I believe is conflicting circuit courts. We also agree this decision likely isn’t the last word.
I’m confused tho, is this nation wide or in just one state?
This applies to the group of states in the 2nd circuit.
Made our week!! Thank you @LambdaLegal for all you do for our communities. 
Twitter ಸಾಮರ್ಥ್ಯ ಮೀರಿರಬಹುದು ಅಥವಾ ಕ್ಷಣಿಕವಾದ ತೊಂದರೆಯನ್ನು ಅನುಭವಿಸುತ್ತಿರಬಹುದು. ಮತ್ತೆ ಪ್ರಯತ್ನಿಸಿ ಅಥವಾ ಹೆಚ್ಚಿನ ಮಾಹಿತಿಗೆ Twitter ಸ್ಥಿತಿಗೆ ಭೇಟಿ ನೀಡಿ.
