Twitter | शोध | |
Ronald Brownstein
Brownstein, a two-time finalist for the Pulitzer Prize, is a senior editor at The Atlantic & a senior political analyst for CNN.
२५,५६१
ट्विट्स
१,८२०
फॉलोइंग
५५,६८५
फॉलोअर्स
ट्विट्स
Ronald Brownstein यांनी पुन्हा ट्विट केले
Joy Reid ४९ मिनि
She was literally quoting the president. Perhaps take it up with him?
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Ronald Brownstein यांनी पुन्हा ट्विट केले
Benjy Sarlin २ ता
New pledge from Harris: No "middle class tax hike" to finance M4A. That doesn't add up. This is why Biden v Bernie fight is the big one on health care. There's only one top tier candidate eager to defend single-payer on its actual merits right now.
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Ronald Brownstein यांनी पुन्हा ट्विट केले
Fred Hiatt २६ मिनि
White nationalism was never just a fringe phenomenon in the US, and it isn’t today, says historian Robert Kagan. The stakes are high now that Trump has fully embraced this toxic philosophy.
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Ronald Brownstein यांनी पुन्हा ट्विट केले
Alan Berube १ ता
Great ⁦⁩ piece on Winston-Salem, highlighting How efforts to land “big fish” (Dell, Caterpillar) fizzled, and why future is bound up in region’s education and research assets ⁦
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Ronald Brownstein यांनी पुन्हा ट्विट केले
James Poniewozik २ ता
"His words mirror those of avowed racists and xenophobes." If you can call racists in the past racist (as that phrase does), why can't you call present-day people racist? This piece doesn't explain. Does a person need to say, "I, _____, am a racist?" How often does that happen?
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Ronald Brownstein ५९ मिनि
Inclination + calculation converge: It is Trump’s instinct, but it is also an expression of the counterrevolution inside conservative circles against the autopsy following 2012-the belief you don’t need minorities and millennials if you mobilize enough blue-collar & older whites
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Ronald Brownstein यांनी पुन्हा ट्विट केले
Mike Murphy १ ता
We are not competitive in CA anymore; Trump era has (insanely) decided to focus on targeting old white men in state where that is demographically foolish. Trump = the anti-CA winning GOP formula.
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Ronald Brownstein यांनी पुन्हा ट्विट केले
Brian Moline १ ता
Worth noting that 's standard and practices editor disagrees with Woods, and the network is using the term "racist" to describe the tweets. Woods and Memmott discuss it here:
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Ronald Brownstein १ ता
Beto sinking makes TX the big unexplored country for Ds after the early four
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Ronald Brownstein १ ता
His political strategy has been pretty consistent since day one: Squeeze bigger margins out of the groups most alienated from a changing America, even at the price of inflaming the other side & straining swing voters. Occasional zigs don’t materially change that guiding star.
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Ronald Brownstein १ ता
B/c even w/cost strains gotta think more voters believe they r better off vs. 16 than believe immigrants/diversity are wrecking US. His approach could win but isn’t he playing on a narrower field precisely b/c character/values doubts alienate too many voters content w/economy?
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Ronald Brownstein १ ता
If you’re saying Ds should run vs Trump’s divisiveness & argue his economy doesn’t work for working people I’d say that’s likely from any nominee. My point is Trump wouldn’t push “who’s a real American” so hard if he was sure “are u better off” will re-elect him over other doubts
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Ronald Brownstein यांनी पुन्हा ट्विट केले
(((JonathanWeisman))) १८ ता
OK, , we've got it. All the Democrats are deranged. Now will you please stop filling our in-boxes?
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Ronald Brownstein २ ता
Wages that fail to address costs? Explain?
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Ronald Brownstein २ ता
If she does well enough in SC to then combine a big portion of AA voters w/college whites (especially women) & some Latinos in the heavily diverse states that dominate the calendar in the weeks after SC, as she might, that will certainly be right. But CA wouldn’t be enough.
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Ronald Brownstein २ ता
What’s clear is that supporters of single payer will be forced to defend the policy specifics far more than in 16 when HRC used process not substance arguments vs it. Many more ?s they will need to answer even for D primary voters on cost, private insurance etc
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Ronald Brownstein यांनी पुन्हा ट्विट केले
davidrlurie २ ता
यांना प्रत्युत्तर देत आहे @RonBrownstein
Curious irony that GOP House is led by a Californian, one apparently sanguine about the literal destruction of the party in his own state.
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Ronald Brownstein यांनी पुन्हा ट्विट केले
Stanley Greenberg २ ता
Democrats risk walking into trap. Thanks, but my new book shows Tea Party and Trump war on war on immigrants is losing to a New America that embraces multiculturalism ⁦⁩ ⁩ ⁩ ⁦⁦
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Ronald Brownstein २ ता
In 2016 Clinton won 3/4 of the vote in Santa Clara county (Silicon Valley) & 3/5 of CA college + whites statewide. As in other states, CA GOP under Trump is a more rural party while eroding in metros (even down to Orange County).That’s the trade he is imposing, w/McCarthys help.
Reply Retweet पसंत केले
Ronald Brownstein २ ता
HRC won CA in 08 vs Obama, then lost almost every contest to him for the next month. Even a state as big & vital as CA gets washed out when it votes w/so many others as it will again (misguidedly)this year. Harris will need confirmation elsewhere starting in South.
Reply Retweet पसंत केले