ทวิตเตอร์ | ค้นหา | |
Roger Barrett
husband, dad, grandad. frustrated at the greed of some and stupidity of others. Social justice for all.
57,269
ทวีต
953
กําลังติดตาม
887
ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีต
Roger Barrett 4 นาที
กำลังตอบกลับถึง @pete3291 @Shambles151 @AlanDuncanMP
One HCP is worth any number of ’s. Just imagine how many HCP staff one could employ, each of which would be focused on serving selflessly, based on the income Duncan pockets each year.
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
Roger Barrett 1 ชม.
กำลังตอบกลับถึง @Alan_Saunders57 @Mr_JDTraynor
They are, as The Independent Group Same applies to them as to Farage & his operation.
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
Roger Barrett 2 ชม.
Listening to the call of the cuckoo at Wicken Fen along with the songs of many other birds
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
Roger Barrett 7 ชม.
กำลังตอบกลับถึง @Mr_JDTraynor
Maybe that’s why he's created a business of/for his political party, he'll funnel the money through the business where companies law applies and then use that as a way to avoid declaring donations to the political party. His is the only party that is also a registered business!
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
Roger Barrett 7 ชม.
กำลังตอบกลับถึง @DavidDavisMP
Your view simply reinforces the contr,or you and your party have for the public. The public have shown by many moving their vote to remain parties that they want to
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
Roger Barrett 7 ชม.
กำลังตอบกลับถึง @RidgeOnSunday @SkyNews และ 2 อื่นๆ
I’ve not seen the Labour or Conservative party registered as a company (local party ‘clubs’ are though). Is have registeratipn with two entities a means of avoiding revealing donor’s? As Farage isn’t involved it all seems a tad dodgy!
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
Roger Barrett 7 ชม.
กำลังตอบกลับถึง @RidgeOnSunday @SkyNews และ 2 อื่นๆ
Has Farage been asked where any donation is being deposited, to the political party as registered with the or with the registered company. Is this a way to get around Electoral, Companies or tax law?
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
Roger Barrett 8 ชม.
กำลังตอบกลับถึง @JamesCleverly @JoRichardsKent @Conservatives
The election results showed that remain parties took large number of seats from I’d suggest the only reason for your interpretation is your desire to ignore the views of the public & impose a corrupt policy on the UK.
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
Roger Barrett 9 ชม.
กำลังตอบกลับถึง @Doozy_45 @UKLabour และ 3 อื่นๆ
More fence sitting by & If there were to be a vote then what’s to stop either party saying it’s advisory then ignoring the outcome? As it stands could either or as party leaders be trusted? I doubt it.
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
Roger Barrett ถูกรีทวีต
James Melville 17 ชม.
Brexit job losses so far: ▪️Total Jobs Lost: 224,585 ▪️Total Annual Wages Lost: £6,440,424,045 ▪️Reduction in Annual Income Tax & National Insurance Receipts £1,928,931,368.95
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
Roger Barrett 10 ชม.
กำลังตอบกลับถึง @timfarron @Hepworthclare และ 2 อื่นๆ
Agreeing to form a coalition with Cameron, Clegg & the facilitated the Tories imposing austerity on the UK. Had your party not formed the coalition & Cameron could never have formed a government.
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
Roger Barrett 18 ชม.
กำลังตอบกลับถึง @NickyMorgan01
Nobody from your party has asked me. No canvassers knocked during the council elections. My local Tory MP won’t reply to correspondence sent by me to them. Your party bases Brexit on a dishonest & corrupt EUREF16 so let me be clear - Resolve Brexit by
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
Roger Barrett ถูกรีทวีต
Seb Dance MEP 5 พ.ค.
This thread. Farage is a man who plays on fear. He thrives on it. And it works. He gives no hope. There’s no truth. But this morning he’s on the front page of the Telegraph and is interviewed on Sunday programmes. Unchallenged, his diet of fear will win.
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
Roger Barrett ถูกรีทวีต
Joshua Silver 18 ชม.
กำลังตอบกลับถึง @JamesCleverly @jameschappers
Mr Cleverly, there have now been credible reports that Mrs May was briefed in 2016 - by those who monitor foreign subversion of the UK - that the Referendum result was unsafe and the vote must be re-run. Why don't you ask Mrs May to tell you what she knows ?
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
Roger Barrett 18 ชม.
กำลังตอบกลับถึง @Shambles151 @theresa_may @GavinWilliamson
Not for the first time it’s time to follow up the money, these leaks & seemingly dodgy deals are a threat to UK democracy.
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
Roger Barrett 18 ชม.
กำลังตอบกลับถึง @Shambles151 @theresa_may @GavinWilliamson
Alleged leaking of confidential meetings from or close too the office of is not new, but this on Brexit negotiations a few days after is sacked by May for allegedly leaking concerns of senior mi inters over Huawei, a deal May is forcing through!
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
Roger Barrett ถูกรีทวีต
BBC One 20 ชม.
Name a more iconic line.
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
Roger Barrett 18 ชม.
กำลังตอบกลับถึง @Rivermansky63 @ElectoralCommUK
Surely there must be rules how a political party is allowed to operate, or is it because the Brexit Party is a registered business. should investigate as a matter of urgency.
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
Roger Barrett 19 ชม.
กำลังตอบกลับถึง @JamesCleverly @vespasian91
Accusations of leaks from the Tory ‘side’ to the press over discussions between them & Labour. It’s evident that trust, integrity & honesty are largely missing from politics. All this and a Brexit based on the outcome@of a dishonest and corrupted EURef16.
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ
Roger Barrett 19 ชม.
the PM who sacked for leaking information from a secure meeting yet today accusations by of leaks of meetings over a Brexit Deal with Can May & those around her be trusted? It seems not.
Reply Retweet ชื่นชอบ