|
Mark Cojuangco
@
markcojuangco
|
|
5th District Pangasinan Philippines Congressman: 12th (2001 - 2004), 13th (2004 - 2007), 14th (2007 - 2010) Congresses
|
|
|
219 986
Tweets
|
823
Abonné
|
3 958
Abonnés
|
| Tweets |
| Mark Cojuangco a Retweeté | ||
|
Thread Reader App
@threadreaderapp
|
9 juil. |
|
Hello you can read it here: Thread by @ShellenbergerMD: "Billionaire Tom Steyer made his fortune financing coal plants As a nat gas/renewables investor, he spent $18M in 2018 tr […]" threadreaderapp.com/thread/1148587…
Enjoy :) 🤖
|
||
|
||
|
|
Mark Cojuangco
@markcojuangco
|
31 min |
|
Somebody needs to fight idiocy.
I’m with him.
Why aren’t you too ?
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Mark Cojuangco
@markcojuangco
|
35 min |
|
Well, the solar won’t be enough for the “day”.
What will substitute/supplement it pre 9AM and post 3PM ?
Batteries?
Gas?
Diesel?
How dirty, expensive, or complicated, is that ?
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Mark Cojuangco
@markcojuangco
|
38 min |
|
You’re right.
Its the Cleanest.
By far.
Specially when you compute for CF using Gas as backup.
Wind & Solar go up to ~390grams CO2/KWh
Nuclear goes up to ~50 grams CO2/KWh pic.twitter.com/k2qL64cvhE
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Mark Cojuangco
@markcojuangco
|
42 min |
|
Solar 15%CF -> Gas 85% of the time
Wind 35%CF -> Gas 65% if the time
And CF is not the complete picture
When these things go to zero, the gas backup is inadequate to make up 100%
Thats when SC Gas kicks in
Super expensive STBY
From the horse’ mouth 👇
youtu.be/n3vkJ7XUwMM
|
||
|
|
||
| Mark Cojuangco a Retweeté | ||
|
Mike Shellenberger
@ShellenbergerMD
|
9 juil. |
|
|
||
| Mark Cojuangco a Retweeté | ||
|
|
Mike Shellenberger
@ShellenbergerMD
|
9 juil. |
|
Had @TomSteyer succeeded in Arizona, emissions & electricity prices would have spiked and Steyer likely would have made millions selling nat gas & solar panels
forbes.com/sites/jamescon…
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Mark Cojuangco
@markcojuangco
|
1 h |
|
But even a Spanish link would be fine to get started.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Mark Cojuangco
@markcojuangco
|
1 h |
|
Thank you 😊
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Mark Cojuangco
@markcojuangco
|
1 h |
|
Apparently its an ancient Spanish ceramic (porous) thing (water jug).
Used to cool drinking water.
Now seems to be they applied the principles to cooling power plants.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Mark Cojuangco
@markcojuangco
|
2 h |
|
May I know the company making this system ?
Is this a nuclear plant ?
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Mark Cojuangco
@markcojuangco
|
2 h |
|
Nuclear plants can be made to not need water to cool twitter.com/fermbarrica/st…
|
||
|
|
||
| Mark Cojuangco a Retweeté | ||
|
|
Mike Shellenberger
@ShellenbergerMD
|
9 juil. |
|
Billionaire Tom Steyer made his fortune financing coal plants
As a nat gas/renewables investor, he spent $18M in 2018 trying to kill US’s largest source of clean energy, Palo Verde nuclear, and replace it with gas & solar
He’s now running for president — as a climate activist
|
||
|
|
||
| Mark Cojuangco a Retweeté | ||
|
Yes Vermont Yankee
@yes_VY
|
2 h |
|
Russian news emphasizes "global catastrophes" with nuclear. Russians are largest exporters of nuclear power plants. They know stories like this make it harder for nuclear vendors in democracy to compete with Russia. facebook.com/SaveVermontYan…
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Mark Cojuangco
@markcojuangco
|
2 h |
|
< 200 is the estimated ultimate number.
But from 1986 until today, it is < 50.
“Today” is 2019.
33 years after.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Mark Cojuangco
@markcojuangco
|
2 h |
|
< 50 Sean.
< 50.
Numbers from Gerry.
Its what I know.
Unless I misheard.
But I think not.
|
||
|
|
||
| Mark Cojuangco a Retweeté | ||
|
Laurenz Hüsler
@HuslerLaurenz
|
4 h |
|
As long as climate warners believe renewables can do it, they don't seem to be good at assessing facts, and as long as the oppose nuclear, they donˋt seem to be good at identifying solutions.
With these two flaws, I wonder how competent they are at assessing climate facts.
|
||
|
|
||
| Mark Cojuangco a Retweeté | ||
|
Luis B. Aramburu
@luisbaram
|
4 h |
|
Exactly!!!!
If they don't want to completely trash their credibility off the bat, they should discard "renewables."
If they fail in the easier subject (energy) how on Earth are we going to trust their judgment on the more complex subject (climate)?
#SacrificeRenewables twitter.com/HuslerLaurenz/…
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Mark Cojuangco
@markcojuangco
|
2 h |
|
Go Nuclear.
Everybody happy.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Mark Cojuangco
@markcojuangco
|
2 h |
|
The construction rates of the 70s, 80s, and then some, could meet that challenge.
|
||
|
|
||