Твиты

	Joel B. Pollak ретвитнул(а)
	Lindsey Graham @LindseyGrahamSC	3 ч.
	В ответ @LindseyGrahamSC Thus far Mueller completely contradicts what he told AG Barr about the reason not to proceed on the obstruction of justice. He told AG Barr that the decision not to proceed was not solely based on the OLC opinion but on complicated facts in the law.
	Посмотреть переписку ·

	Joel B. Pollak ретвитнул(а)
	Lindsey Graham @LindseyGrahamSC	3 ч.
	Wow. Robert Mueller changing the job of a prosecutor from proving someone ‘Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt’ to ‘Not being able to exonerate someone accused of a crime.’ Dangerous and ridiculous.
	Подробнее ·

	Joel B. Pollak @joelpollak	40 мин.
	Under questioning from @RepArmstrongND Robert Mueller struggles to explain why many of his prosecutors were Clinton supporters and attorneys. He says he does not ask about political affiliations, but Armstrong argues that in this case he had to maintain the appearance of fairness
	Подробнее ·

	Joel B. Pollak @joelpollak	1 ч.
	.@DebbieLesko confronts Robert Mueller with the fact that he has repeatedly said in the past that he was NOT saying he would have charged the president with obstruction of justice if not for the OLC memorandum against indicting a sitting president. He can't explain, can't answer.
	Подробнее ·

	Joel B. Pollak @joelpollak	2 ч.
	Robert Mueller says, for the second time (this time to @TedLieu), that the fact that he is "going through the elements" of obstruction does not mean he agrees
	Показать местоположение ·

	Joel B. Pollak @joelpollak	2 ч.
	Good use of visual aids by the Democrats to lend undue credence to otherwise ridiculous conclusions. Republicans should learn for when they take power
	Подробнее ·

	Joel B. Pollak ретвитнул(а)
	Andrew Desiderio @AndrewDesiderio	2 ч.
	This response from Mueller is a problem for Dems saying Trump would’ve been charged with obstruction if he weren’t POTUS. “I don’t subscribe necessarily to the way you analyzed that. I'm not saying it's out of the ballpark, but I’m not supportive of that analytical charge.” twitter.com/AndrewDesideri…
	Подробнее ·

	Joel B. Pollak ретвитнул(а)
	Andrew Desiderio @AndrewDesiderio	2 ч.
	В ответ @AndrewDesiderio Hmmmm… “I don’t subscribe necessarily to the way you analyzed that,” Mueller says after Hakeem Jeffries puts up a graphic showing that Trump met all three elements of obstruction when he ordered McGah to fire Mueller.
	Посмотреть переписку ·

	Joel B. Pollak @joelpollak	2 ч.
	Robert Mueller can't explain why he came to a conclusion on collusion, but not on obstruction, given that the rule against indicting a president applies to both
	Показать местоположение ·

	Joel B. Pollak @joelpollak	2 ч.
	If Democrats think @RepJeffries is making a good case on obstruction of justice, they should impeach the president. It would be a great idea. (Robert Mueller struggles to add that he does not necessarily support Jeffries's conclusions. Why should that matter?)
	Подробнее ·

	Joel B. Pollak @joelpollak	2 ч.
	This may be true but it is also a potential cop-out for Democrats who would blame Robert Mueller's health for the fact that his investigation is worse than a total zero twitter.com/GaryGrumbach/s…
	Подробнее ·

	Joel B. Pollak @joelpollak	2 ч.
	"Does not exonerate," but also does not prove. Robert Mueller never pointed that out. A new low in Democrats' assault on justice in general.
	Подробнее ·

	Joel B. Pollak ретвитнул(а)
	Sean Davis @seanmdav	2 ч.
	Jim Jordan notes that according to Mueller's report, key DOJ witness Joseph Mifsud, who helped launch the anti-Trump investigation, repeatedly lied to Mueller's investigators. Jordan asked why Mifsud wasn't charged for lying. Mueller refused to answer.
	Подробнее ·

	Joel B. Pollak @joelpollak	2 ч.
	Two movies, one screen: Fox News: "Disaster" for Robert Mueller on presumption of innocence, etc. CNN/MSNBC: "Mueller: Trump Was Not Exonerated" (@TheJuanWilliams finds his party talking points: important that Mueller said what his report said, but out loud.) @ScottAdamsSays
	Показать местоположение ·

	Joel B. Pollak @joelpollak	2 ч.
	What part of the presumption of innocence do you disagree with? twitter.com/OrangeShamWow/…
	Подробнее ·

	Joel B. Pollak @joelpollak	3 ч.
	Robert Mueller on Democrats‘ Collusion with Russia: ‘Outside My Purview‘ | Breitbart bit.ly/2JWkO8E via @BreitbartNews
	Показать сводку ·

	Joel B. Pollak @joelpollak	3 ч.
	Democrats got their sound bite, but Republicans are systematically destroying Robert Mueller's credibility. As an evidentiary matter, this is a big own goal for the Democrats. They wanted a little clip for CNN, a political show. The cost: Mueller is no longer credible in any way.
	Показать местоположение ·

	Joel B. Pollak @joelpollak	3 ч.
	How is Fusion GPS "outside my purview"? Robert Mueller can't explain why the investigation never explored the question of Democrat collusion with Russia.
	Показать местоположение ·

	Joel B. Pollak ретвитнул(а)
	Buck Sexton @BuckSexton	3 ч.
	So....was Mueller really just a figurehead to give some degree of swamp gravitas to this sham investigation while his Democrat deputies ran it as the absurd witch hunt that it was?
	Подробнее ·

	Joel B. Pollak ретвитнул(а)
	Kimberley Strassel @KimStrassel	3 ч.
	Ratcliffe gets to the heart of the problem: what reg or rule says you as special counsel get to declare “not exonerated” if charges are not brought? Innocent until PROVEN guilty. #MuellerHearing
	Подробнее ·