| ಟ್ವೀಟ್ಗಳು |
|
Vitalik Buterin
@VitalikButerin
|
9 ಗಂ. |
|
Why not just use zcash?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Vitalik Buterin
@VitalikButerin
|
ಫೆಬ್ರವರಿ 26 |
|
.@jcp on how the crypto community gets stuff done, and schedules calls.
youtube.com/watch?v=JHRXrv…
|
||
|
|
||
|
Vitalik Buterin
@VitalikButerin
|
ಫೆಬ್ರವರಿ 24 |
|
They've given up on low-distance VitalikButerin handles already.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Vitalik Buterin
@VitalikButerin
|
ಫೆಬ್ರವರಿ 24 |
|
1. I don't have the ability to *not* let them do that
2. twitter.com/vitalikbuterin…
|
||
|
|
||
|
Vitalik Buterin
@VitalikButerin
|
ಫೆಬ್ರವರಿ 23 |
|
To clarify, @peter_szilagyi is not a scammer, he's our beloved geth dev. But people replying to this tweet maybe are scammers, so be cautious and don't send anyone your ETH!
|
||
|
|
||
|
Vitalik Buterin
@VitalikButerin
|
ಫೆಬ್ರವರಿ 23 |
|
Twitter is terrible, part 629: go to this link, but with the space removed. Notice how it is not in fact my tweet.
https: //twitter.com/VitalikButerin/status/966340995347513344
|
||
|
|
||
|
Vitalik Buterin
@VitalikButerin
|
ಫೆಬ್ರವರಿ 23 |
|
不知道,他们好像抓我了,但是一直没告诉我他们抓我了。
|
||
|
|
||
|
Vitalik Buterin
@VitalikButerin
|
ಫೆಬ್ರವರಿ 21 |
|
Particularly, I recall the whitepaper says it doesn't offer oil, it offers bolivars based on the oil price. On top of risk of total default, this gives them opportunity to do a partial default by manipulating the official bolivar rate, which they have a history of doing.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Vitalik Buterin
@VitalikButerin
|
ಫೆಬ್ರವರಿ 21 |
|
This is why the crypto community needs to move away from "yay, blockchain" and zoom in specifically on what is the trust model of each project. This one is definitely quite centralized, and dependent in multiple ways on a central party (venez gov) that seems not very trustworthy.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Vitalik Buterin
@VitalikButerin
|
ಫೆಬ್ರವರಿ 21 |
|
désolé, je suis trop occupé :(
|
||
|
|
||
|
Vitalik Buterin
@VitalikButerin
|
ಫೆಬ್ರವರಿ 21 |
|
To be fair, the original original founder is @MihaiAlisie :)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Vitalik Buterin
@VitalikButerin
|
ಫೆಬ್ರವರಿ 21 |
|
Viper is not Turing-complete....
|
||
|
|
||
|
Vitalik Buterin
@VitalikButerin
|
ಫೆಬ್ರವರಿ 20 |
|
That doesn't let you collaboratively edit in real time.
|
||
|
|
||
| Vitalik Buterin ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ | ||
|
Matt Liston
@malloc8
|
ಫೆಬ್ರವರಿ 20 |
|
Thank you for writing excellent articles sharing the Ethereum Community Fund (ecf.network) vision with the Chinese community!
非常感谢这两篇文章,向中国社区介绍以太坊社区基金的愿景!
jinse.com/blockchain/150…
mp.weixin.qq.com/s/Ocg8zr815_5o…
|
||
|
|
||
|
Vitalik Buterin
@VitalikButerin
|
ಫೆಬ್ರವರಿ 19 |
|
I don't want self-hosted; I want the convenience of having a third-party provider (at least until decentralization tech gets good enough to substitute) run the thing without giving them access to any actual private information.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Vitalik Buterin
@VitalikButerin
|
ಫೆಬ್ರವರಿ 19 |
|
Oh I'm not arguing against mistrust where warranted. I'm arguing against large differentials between the level of mistrust toward people inside vs outside arbitrary categories.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Vitalik Buterin
@VitalikButerin
|
ಫೆಬ್ರವರಿ 19 |
|
Aggregating terminal goals is an unsolved (and, see Arrow et al, to some degree unsolvable) problem, but for anything to do with beliefs about claims that could be true or false, having a system that aims as much as possible toward truth is essential.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Vitalik Buterin
@VitalikButerin
|
ಫೆಬ್ರವರಿ 19 |
|
Is there a Google Docs-like collaborative office software suite, where everything is client-side encrypted?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Vitalik Buterin
@VitalikButerin
|
ಫೆಬ್ರವರಿ 19 |
|
21st century (companies | orgs | states) are porous, and need to be porous to achieve the full benefits of global cooperation, and need to be secure *despite* being porous.
I feel like cryptoeconomics is actually on the forefront of analyzing the possibility of this.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Vitalik Buterin
@VitalikButerin
|
ಫೆಬ್ರವರಿ 19 |
|
In general, the "we trust those who are internal, we mistrust those who are external, and we need walls to keep external influence down" seems like totally the wrong approach for the 21st century.
|
||
|
|
||