|
Steven J. Harper
@
StevenJHarper1
|
|
Atty, author, MSNBC commentator, Adj Prof/NWLaw, creator/curator of TRUMP-RUSSIA Timeline:newsandguts.com & justsecurity.org
|
|
|
5,238
ಟ್ವೀಟ್ಗಳು
|
56
ಹಿಂಬಾಲಿಸುತ್ತಿರುವವರು
|
4,835
ಹಿಂಬಾಲಕರು
|
| ಟ್ವೀಟ್ಗಳು |
|
|
Steven J. Harper
@StevenJHarper1
|
2 ಗಂ. |
|
Proud to announce the Timeline's latest new association: @just_security. (@DanRather @NewsandGuts began hosting it last week.) I'll continue posting my take on the latest developments--many of which are underreported. Here's this week's installment: wp.me/pSlxy-4An twitter.com/just_security/…
|
||
|
||
|
|
Steven J. Harper
@StevenJHarper1
|
2 ಗಂ. |
|
Mueller is leading by example -- It's about the result, not who gets the credit: wp.me/pSlxy-4An
|
||
|
|
||
| Steven J. Harper ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ | ||
|
|
Steven J. Harper
@StevenJHarper1
|
18 ಗಂ. |
|
This is what happens when a lawyer makes a really, really bad argument for no good reason: Client facing little risk of prison time going into a sentencing hearing leaves with a real prospect of incarceration. wapo.st/2EtK84T?tid=ss…
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Steven J. Harper
@StevenJHarper1
|
18 ಗಂ. |
|
This is what happens when a lawyer makes a really, really bad argument for no good reason: Client facing little risk of prison time going into a sentencing hearing leaves with a real prospect of incarceration. wapo.st/2EtK84T?tid=ss…
|
||
|
|
||
| Steven J. Harper ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ | ||
|
|
Steven J. Harper
@StevenJHarper1
|
ಡಿಸೆಂ 18 |
|
Lavrov's warning is the bookend to Trump March 31, 2016 statement to his National Security Team: "I don't want to go to World War III over Ukraine."
Same meeting: Trump encouraged Papadopoulos' proposed Trump-Putin meeting.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Steven J. Harper
@StevenJHarper1
|
ಡಿಸೆಂ 18 |
|
Lavrov's warning is the bookend to Trump March 31, 2016 statement to his National Security Team: "I don't want to go to World War III over Ukraine."
Same meeting: Trump encouraged Papadopoulos' proposed Trump-Putin meeting.
|
||
|
|
||
| Steven J. Harper ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ | ||
|
|
Steven J. Harper
@StevenJHarper1
|
ಡಿಸೆಂ 16 |
|
Trump's 8th Russia-related tweet today. In real time, we're watching the 21st century equivalent of Nixon talking to the presidential portraits on the walls of the White House as his presidency unraveled. 👇
twitter.com/realDonaldTrum…
|
||
|
|
||
| Steven J. Harper ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ | ||
|
|
Steven J. Harper
@StevenJHarper1
|
ಡಿಸೆಂ 16 |
|
Starr would be well advised to stop defending the indefensible based on evidence that he has not seen. As a former independent counsel, he knows better. And btw, Starr's investigation lasted more than 4 years. Started w/Whitewater; ended w/Lewinsky.
twitter.com/realDonaldTrum…
|
||
|
|
||
| Steven J. Harper ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ | ||
|
|
Steven J. Harper
@StevenJHarper1
|
ಡಿಸೆಂ 15 |
|
?
1. We don't know all Mueller has;
2. Mueller so far hasn't proven Trump conspiracy w/Russia;
3. So: "The case that his campaign might have conspired with the Russian attack on the 2016 election looks weaker than ever."
Stunning ignorance of the Timeline: newsandguts.com/trump-russia/
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Steven J. Harper
@StevenJHarper1
|
ಡಿಸೆಂ 16 |
|
Trump's 8th Russia-related tweet today. In real time, we're watching the 21st century equivalent of Nixon talking to the presidential portraits on the walls of the White House as his presidency unraveled. 👇
twitter.com/realDonaldTrum…
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Steven J. Harper
@StevenJHarper1
|
ಡಿಸೆಂ 16 |
|
Starr would be well advised to stop defending the indefensible based on evidence that he has not seen. As a former independent counsel, he knows better. And btw, Starr's investigation lasted more than 4 years. Started w/Whitewater; ended w/Lewinsky.
twitter.com/realDonaldTrum…
|
||
|
|
||
| Steven J. Harper ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ | ||
|
|
Steven J. Harper
@StevenJHarper1
|
ಡಿಸೆಂ 15 |
|
NPR and @philewing have a lot of explaining to do. People lie for a reason.
Yet Trump-Russia case looks "weaker than ever"?
Is this supposed to be journalism? News analysis? Opinion?
Whatever it is, it ignores known facts and the way prosecutors work.
NPR is better than this. twitter.com/StevenJHarper1…
|
||
|
|
||
| Steven J. Harper ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ | ||
|
|
Steven J. Harper
@StevenJHarper1
|
ಡಿಸೆಂ 15 |
|
Too little; too late.
1. @philewing's @nprpolitics piece isn't "analysis"; that would require considering all relevant facts.
2. Ewing's piece reveals a shameful (esp. for a journalist) ignorance of basic facts and how prosecutors proceed.
3. @nprpolitics needs to remove it. Now.
|
||
|
|
||
| Steven J. Harper ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ | ||
|
|
Steven J. Harper
@StevenJHarper1
|
ಡಿಸೆಂ 15 |
|
Changing the title and adding an "Editor's note" doesn't solve the problem with this one. twitter.com/StevenJHarper1…
|
||
|
|
||
| Steven J. Harper ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ | ||
|
|
Steven J. Harper
@StevenJHarper1
|
ಡಿಸೆಂ 15 |
|
It’s not just me... twitter.com/MalcolmNance/s…
|
||
|
|
||
| Steven J. Harper ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ | ||
|
|
Steven J. Harper
@StevenJHarper1
|
ಡಿಸೆಂ 15 |
|
Stakes way too high for NPR to get this sooooo wrong. twitter.com/StevenJHarper1…
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Steven J. Harper
@StevenJHarper1
|
ಡಿಸೆಂ 15 |
|
It’s not just me... twitter.com/MalcolmNance/s…
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Steven J. Harper
@StevenJHarper1
|
ಡಿಸೆಂ 15 |
|
Stakes way too high for NPR to get this sooooo wrong. twitter.com/StevenJHarper1…
|
||
|
|
||
| Steven J. Harper ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ | ||
|
|
Steven J. Harper
@StevenJHarper1
|
ಡಿಸೆಂ 15 |
|
.@nprpolitics should delete @philewing piece. Repackaging as "analysis" w/Editor's note & new title insufficient, Reveals peril of wandering into area about which self-styled "analyst" knows nothing. Before opining on meaning of legal developments, try talking to a lawyer first.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Steven J. Harper
@StevenJHarper1
|
ಡಿಸೆಂ 15 |
|
.@nprpolitics should delete @philewing piece. Repackaging as "analysis" w/Editor's note & new title insufficient, Reveals peril of wandering into area about which self-styled "analyst" knows nothing. Before opining on meaning of legal developments, try talking to a lawyer first.
|
||
|
|
||