A short film about gender roles, Trans, and what it is like to have an identity that deviates from the status quo.
Jedis, Bellas, and Jaegers await you in our Winter Movie Guide. Plan your season and take note of the hotly anticipated indie, foreign, and documentary releases, too.
Related News
‘A Ghost Story’: The Craft of a Low-Budget Indie Shouldn’t Be Forgotten During Awards Season
22 November 2017 1:49 AM, +02:00 | Indiewire
22 November 2017 1:49 AM, +02:00 | Indiewire
User Lists
Related lists from IMDb users
Connect with IMDb
Share this Rating
Title: Break Free (2014)
Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.
Photos
Edit
Plot Summary
|
Add Synopsis
Storyline
A short film about gender roles, Trans, and what it is like to have an identity that deviates from the status quo.
Genres:
ShortParents Guide:
View content advisory »
Edit
See full technical specs »
Details
Country:
AustraliaLanguage:
NoneRelease Date:
14 July 2014 (Australia) See more »Company Credits
Show more on
IMDbPro »
Technical Specs
Runtime:
Color:
Color
Edit
Did You Know?
Frequently Asked Questions
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question."The IMDb Show" takes a look at the new trailer for Ready Player One and breaks down director Steven Spielberg's five greatest Easter eggs of all time. Plus, we connect the dots between IMDb's Top 10 Stars of 2017.
Ruby Rose is not an actress. Just because someone is in something, supposedly acting, doesn't mean they really deserved to be in that position. Ruby Rose is not an artist (of any kind). Ruby Rose is not that special. Ruby Rose's tattoos don't make her anything but a tattooed woman. Ruby Rose has no significant talent whatsoever. Ruby Rose sucked in every movie she was in. Ruby Rose is just another person banking on a trend. Ruby Rose is no writer (and to imply that by giving her a writing, directing, editing or any credit whatsoever is preposterous). I wasn't moved by this (in any way) and anyone who was should take a long hard look at themselves (ultimately discovering they're as talent-less as the supposed *star* they're worshiping). I would give this a zero, but sadly IMDb doesn't allow it. I guess there's a point in there somewhere for the person who actually did the work. 1/10