| Credited cast: | |||
| Amir Bar-Lev | ... |
Himself
|
|
|
|
Anthony Brunelli | ... |
Himself
|
|
|
Elizabeth Cohen | ... |
Herself
|
|
|
Jonathan Crosby | ... |
(voice)
|
|
|
Ron Curtis Jr. | ... |
(voice)
|
|
|
Michael Kimmelman | ... |
Himself
|
|
|
Laura Olmstead | ... |
Herself
|
|
|
Mark Olmstead | ... |
Himself
|
|
|
Marla Olmstead | ... |
Herself
|
|
|
Zane Olmstead | ... |
Himself
|
| Celeste Russi | ... |
(voice)
|
|
| Tara Sands | ... |
(voice)
|
|
|
|
Stuart Simpson | ... |
Himself
|
|
|
Jackie Wescott | ... |
Herself
|
Four year old Marla Olmstead from Binghamton, New York became the sensation of the art world for her abstract artwork, which have sold for thousands of dollars per piece. The showing of her work started off as a lark, but when the paintings sold without the buyers knowing who the artist was, the media began to run with the story. Through it all, Marla's parents, Mark Olmstead and Laura Olmstead, want to be grounded in what is best for their daughter while exposing her to whatever positive may come from the experience. But some negative and big name media also surfaces, some questioning whether Marla is the real artist behind the work, and some questioning exposing a four year old to such infamy. Regardless, the fact of this art selling brings up the legitimacy of abstract art being quantified as "quality", especially if a four year old can produce it but can't express the emotions or rationale behind its creation. Or is art truly in the eyes of the beholder? Regardless, money, in the ... Written by Huggo
Fascinating documentary about a 4 year old girl who makes abstract paintings that sell for thousands of dollars. The question is raised by a 60 Minutes piece which questions whether or not the girl is actually doing the work herself (I say she is, and that this whole "controversy" is beside the point). But the bigger questions concern the unanswerable, as in "what is art?" If a little girl who is just sort of playing can make beautiful abstract paintings, then how hard could it be? What do we consider art? What are the criteria? The story of what the family went through as the result of the hatchet job by 60 Minutes ultimately makes the film a far more interesting one than it would have been otherwise. And at times the tables are turned on the filmmaker, as he becomes a figure in the film, questioned by its participants. Is this a good movie? Let's just say that I liked this film enough to watch all the "special features" on the DVD, something that I never do. See it.