| Cast overview, first billed only: | |||
| Margaret Sullavan | ... | ||
| James Stewart | ... | ||
| Robert Young | ... |
Fritz Marberg
|
|
| Frank Morgan | ... |
Professor Viktor Roth
|
|
| Robert Stack | ... |
Otto Von Rohn
|
|
| Bonita Granville | ... |
Elsa
|
|
| Irene Rich | ... |
Mrs. Emilia Roth
|
|
| William T. Orr | ... |
Erich Von Rohn
|
|
| Maria Ouspenskaya | ... |
Mrs. Hilda Breitner
|
|
|
|
Gene Reynolds | ... |
Rudi Roth
|
| Russell Hicks | ... |
Rector
|
|
|
|
William Edmunds | ... |
Lehman
|
| Esther Dale | ... |
Marta
|
|
| Dan Dailey | ... |
Holl
(as Dan Dailey Jr.)
|
|
| Granville Bates | ... |
Professor Berg
|
|
Interesting to note that the film was made in 1940, 1 year before America's entry into the European war against Hitler. The movie depicts Germany in 1933. In 1938 the 'night of broken glass' took place. Interesting to note the attitudes portrayed in the film, definitely anti-Nazi. Written by Matt Goodwin
I first saw The Mortal Storm when I was twelve or so and it made a huge impression on me. I've wanted to re-watch ever since and today, twenty-years later, I caught it again.
Produced in 1940, Frank Morgan, James Stewart and Margaret Sullivan head a terrific cast. This is a film which makes you think and makes you angry. Yes, it's melodramatic, but so what? It's melodrama in the best sense of the word. This is emotion serving the cause of reason, casting a shining light on darkness. This is a film which still has the power to make you sweat.
I'd like to address some of the specific criticisms made in the other comments.
Firstly, the film is set in 1933. It opens with the rise to power of Hitler, and visual references to the year 1933 appear in the film (The professor's paperwork in the prison, for instance, is dated August 29, 1933). How much time passes during the film is unclear, it is certainly less than a year, so escaping to Austria WAS still an option.
Secondly, the reason the "sons" could be Nazis, despite the Professor being "Non Aryan" was that they were his step-sons, the children of his wife's first marriage. I'm fairly certain that the daughter and younger son DID belong to the Professor, although this is not made clear.