• Home
  • IFAD website
  • Subscribe to posts
  • Subscribe to comments
Showing posts with label Rimisp. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rimisp. Show all posts

Diálogo de políticas para una nueva agenda de transformación rural

Posted by cortescarrasbal Wednesday, January 6, 2016 0 comments

Por M. Ignacia Fernández,
Directora Ejecutiva de RIMISP-Centro Latinoamericano para el Desarrollo Rural 

El pasado mes de noviembre, en el marco de la primera semana FIDA sobre Desarrollo Rural en El Salvador, un panel sobre la los Grupos de Dialogo Rural (GDRs) sirvió para reflexionar y hacer balance de esta iniciativa latinoamericana de diálogo sobre políticas públicas.

Los Grupos de Dialogo Rural (GDRs) fueron establecidos en cuatro países de América Latina - México, El Salvador, Colombia y Ecuador -, con el objetivo de promover y fomentar el diálogo sobre políticas públicas. Están conformados por un conjunto de personalidades influyentes de las organizaciones sociales, el mundo empresarial, la academia las organizaciones no gubernamentales y el gobierno, que ven en los procesos de diálogo una oportunidad de aunar fuerzas para promover la inclusión en una agenda pública -que a menudo las pasa por alto- de cuestiones relacionadas con el desarrollo rural que son de relevancia nacional.

La metodología de trabajo de los GDRs ha sido desarrollada por RIMISP-Centro Latinoamericano para el Desarrollo Rural junto con el Fondo Internacional para el Desarrollo Agrícola (FIDA). Cada GDR definió una agenda prioritaria e identificó objetivos específicos de cambio en las políticas rurales, de acuerdo a las condiciones y prioridades de cada país. Los resultados de estos años de trabajo han sido ampliamente satisfactorios. Son varias las políticas y estrategias que benefician a los pobres rurales de la región que llevan el sello de los GDR: la Ley de Tierras y Desarrollo Rural en Colombia, la Estrategia de Desarrollo de la Franja Costero Marina en El Salvador o la Estrategia del Buen Vivir Rural en Ecuador, por mencionar solo algunas.


La experiencia de los GDR nos muestra que el diálogo bien guiado y contando con los actores sociales adecuados puede ser una poderosa herramienta de cambio para superar la pobreza rural. Como decimos en RIMISP, “la mejor política pública se hace dialogando”.

Aunque cada GDR tiene sus especificidades y está particularmente atento a las oportunidades que ofrece la agenda  política en cada país, existen ciertos elementos comunes de su metodología en los que creemos que radica su particular contribución a los procesos de cambio.

El más importante, es la formulación de propuestas de políticas públicas sólidamente basadas en la evidencia empírica que deriva de procesos complementarios de investigación y análisis. El segundo es la creación de grupos diversos, legitimados y autónomos respecto de los gobiernos de turno que desarrollan relaciones estratégicas con actores claves y se mantienen atentos a las oportunidades que ofrece un entorno cambiante.


A esto se suma otro elemento clave, consistente en una capacidad creciente y reconocida de comprender el desarrollo rural como un campo interdisciplinario, que requiere de políticas intersectoriales. Los GDR han sabido lidiar con gobiernos organizados en compartimentos bien definidos, apoyándolos en la resolución eficaz de asuntos que trascienden los límites de un único ministerio, secretaría o servicio público.

Cada vez son más las dimensiones del desarrollo rural que escapan al mandato legal,  la vocación y  las capacidades sectoriales de los ministerios de agricultura. Tal es el caso de la fuerte expansión de la infraestructura y de la cobertura de los servicios de educación y salud, o la preminencia de actividades económicas no agrícolas en las zonas rurales.


Los GDR apuntan justamente a la necesidad de proporcionar espacios de diálogo multidisciplinar e intersectorial que permitan y fomenten la discusión de temas relacionados con las políticas de desarrollo rural más allá del lugar que tradicionalmente las instituciones les han otorgado. Estos espacios permiten abordar de manera integral las problemáticas e intereses que convergen en torno a este tema, así como dar salida a propuestas concretas de políticas públicas que cuenten con un consenso social y respondan a intereses de beneficio colectivo.

Este es el tipo de resultados que presentaron los secretarios técnicos de los cuatro GDR en el panel en San Salvador en noviembre pasado. Todos ellos destacaron cómo la  participación del FIDA en estos grupos puede contribuir a escalar su capacidad de incidencia, abriendo conversaciones con nuevos actores, nuevas oportunidades y nuevos temas para la transformación rural. 


Policy engagement is key, but… how to assess its impact?

Posted by cortescarrasbal Monday, June 29, 2015 0 comments


By Tomás Rosada, IFAD’s Regional Economist for LAC and Ed Heinemann, Lead Technical Specialist – Policy in PTA.

Policies have an impact on every dimension of poor rural people's lives. They shape economic opportunities, provide a ladder for people to climb out of poverty or can prevent them to make it to that ladder.

For IFAD, policy engagement is a core part of our business. It is the only way to create the conditions for larger numbers of rural people to move out of poverty, above and beyond the impact of individual projects.

IFAD-funded projects and programmes are increasingly becoming laboratories to test new ways of tackling rural poverty. When lessons and learning from our investment activities are scaled up and incorporated into policy framework at a national level, the projects achieve their ultimate goal and targets.

Policy engagement happens in many different ways:

  • Supporting the creation and strengthening of public institutions working on rural development policies and rural people’s organizations
  • Promoting fora for sharing experiences and concerns between governments, rural people and private sector players
  • Operationalizing policy programmes at local, regional and national levels.

It is hard to tell when a change in policy will have a positive impact on the lives of rural people, and it is even more difficult to assess the overall contribution policy engagement. Yet answering these questions is key if we want to be able to assess our performance in this field.

Policy engagement: A central part of development work

Some days ago, IFAD hosted the event Assessing the Impact of Policy Engagement. This gathering provided a unique opportunity for IFAD and its partners to reflect on these questions.

IFAD’s Senior Policy Technical Specialist Lauren Phillips, – set the scene: "for IFAD, policy engagement is the process by which IFAD, and IFAD-supported projects and grants, work with governments and other national actors to create, reform, implement or monitor policies.

"The final goal is to influence policy (the combination of laws, regulations, institutional approaches and practices) and to shape it in a way that allows poor rural people to overcome poverty", said Phillips.

John Young, Head of the Research and Policy in Development Programme at ODI ©IFAD
John Young is Head of the Research and Policy in Development Programme at the Overseas Development Institute (ODI), a well-known British think tank. For him, policy engagement is a “central part” of international development work.

“Outright policy change is rare and the causes that lead to it are often unique and rarely able to be replicated.”

However, a number of frameworks and approaches can help to overcome conceptual and technical difficulties when it comes to assessing the impact of policy engagement. All of them involve developing a theory of change: a logical model or roadmap of how one envisages policy changes.

“The earlier and clearer you have your theory of change, the easier it is to check it against delivery.”

Review what works and what doesn’t

Ignacia Fernández, Lead Researcher at the Latin-American Centre for Rural Development (RIMISP), talked about a successful experience of policy engagement in four countries of Latin America. The IFAD-funded project Knowledge for Change has allowed RIMISP to set up Rural Dialogue Groups (GDR) in Mexico, El Salvador, Colombia and Ecuador.

The GDRs are fora where representatives of these countries’ authorities and smallholder organizations discuss how to create a political environment for poor people to overcome poverty. They have facilitated the adoption of policies in favour of family farming in the areas of biodiversity, adaptation to climate change and agricultural innovation.

Susana Márquez and Ignacia Fernández, first and second on the left ©IFAD
After three years of experience, RIMISP was able to set up an evaluation strategy for GDRs based on a model called steps of influence. Its aim is to identify which actors contribute to policy changes -and how.

“This has allowed us to learn more and better about which mechanisms led to positive outcomes and which mechanisms failed and have to be redesigned.”

Susana Márquez, Planning and Strategy Manager at the Unit for Rural Change (UCAR), Argentina’s national branch of the Specialized Meeting on Family Farming (REAF) illustrated some of their achievements of this policy dialogue body of the Common Market of the South (MERCOSUR, the free trade area formed up by Argentina, Brasil, Paraguay, Uruguay and Venezuela).

REAF has functioned as a political forum for representatives of family farmers’ organizations, academia, civil society and policy-makers from MERCOSUR countries to discuss public policies targeting family farming. REAF policy recommendations have been implemented at a national level, including both pro-family-farming legislation and financial support programmes.

Márquez made clear that REAF “has no crystal ball. Yet we know now some approaches work and some do not.”

And what does work? “The adoption of a strict methodology, the definition of clear but broad objectives and, above all, flexibility. To create policy engagement you have to be flexible, trusted by both governments and civil society.”

National strategies to define policy engagement targets

Óscar García, director of IFAD's Independent Office of Evaluation pointed to the Results-Based Country Strategies (COSOPs) as an essential pillar to build on policy engagement.

“The COSOP preparation process is where IFAD and governments agree on how they can collaborate to promote rural development. To evaluate what that collaboration brings about is impossible if we don’t know what we want to achieve.”

Left to right: Edward Heinemann, Óscar García, Paolo Silveri and Lisandro Martín ©IFAD
He also shared a proposed framework for evaluating policy engagement – one that recognises the complex policy cycle and the need to distinguish between policy dialogue, adoption, implementation and outcomes.

Lisandro Martín, IFAD’s Senior Portfolio Manager, reminded us of the strong correlation that exists between good policies and good project outcomes. “Thus, it is critical for IFAD to have a specific focus on policy engagement as part of its self-assessment system.”

Martín underscored that COSOPs are the natural space to capture policy engagement objectives and activities, but “we need to be conceptually clear as to what can be attributed to IFAD’s policy engagement and the outcomes and impact to which it contributes.”

As we closed this half-day event, the following lessons emerged: First, there is no single right method to assess the impact of policy dialogue. Second, and more importantly, every path starts by knowing where you want to go. Otherwise, is impossible to know whether you have arrived or not.


You can consult the summaries of some of the presentations made at the learning event Assessing the Impact of Policy Engagement:

Linking small producers with the world

Posted by Greg Benchwick Friday, October 26, 2012 0 comments



Slow Food and Terra Madre videos shared at the Salone del Gusto Internazionale and Terra Madre Event in Torino highlight the opportunity to connect family farmers, local chefs and regional cuisine with the rest of the world.

Spotted!

Edwin Viña, a young chef from Tarija, Bolivia (left), had the honor of carrying his country's flag into the event. Edwin is taking part in the Paths of Excellence Program. The young entrepreneur represents Tarija Aromas y Sabores, a public-private initiative designed to promote the rich gastronomic offerings from the Tarija region - including agro-tourism, hams, cheeses, wines and Bolivia's signature grape brandy Singani. The Tarija Aromas y Sabores Program is part of a program supported by Discovering Territories through Products and People Program, Rimisp, the IFAD-supported Scaling-up of Rural Innovations Program that is working in Bolivia and Peru, IDRC-Canada and the Ford Foundation.

Juliette Taco Viza is a young enterpriser from the Colca Valley in Peru. Juliette also participated in the Scaling-Up Rural Innovations Program. Also in this photo, Dario Fo, Nobel Prize winner in literature, Carlo Petrini, Slow Food President, and FAO President José Graziano da Silva. (Photos Slow Food)






Social Feeds


Share it!

Paths of excellence

Posted by Greg Benchwick Thursday, October 25, 2012 0 comments

Small producers highlight their work at the Salone del Gusto and Terra Madre event in Turin
By Terra Madre
Etson is a young Peruvian from the Colca Valley. Edwin is a chef in southern Bolivia. Fernando collects a sought-after shellfish, the loco, in Chile. Saleheddine cultivates fields in a northern Moroccan biosphere reserve. What do these four have in common?

They are all working to try to guarantee sustainable and socially inclusive development based on the value of biological and cultural diversity in their countries, a huge challenge. They all believe in the value of the natural and cultural heritage that makes their land, their history and their way of life unique, a heritage that is the result of thousands of years of interaction between nature and migrating populations, millennia of overlapping and integrating people, products, customs and beliefs.

They all want to preserve this identity, and above all to promote it. They want to turn the uniqueness that originates from diversity into an economic and social resource.

Regina, who promotes social gastronomy in Rio de Janeiro, and Pavlos, whose family has been producing excellent olive oil in the hills of Thrace for centuries, have the same objectives. They have joined many other farmers, fishers, cooks, food experts, young leaders and representatives from local organizations in setting out on an ambitious and innovative path, leading towards local development and the spread of fair work conditions.

They are all the protagonists of a pilot project run by Slow Food and the Rural Territorial Development with Cultural Identity program of Rimisp – Latin American Center for Rural Development.

The project, run by Slow Food and support of the Ford Foundation, is called “The paths of excellence: Discovering Territories through Products and People”. It will be presented at the Salone del Gusto and Terra Madre in Turin, the first stop for a traveling exhibition about the project.

The exhibition will present 12 different areas often characterized by inequality and marginalization, in both developed and developing countries in Latin America, North Africa and Europe. The public will be able to meet the custodians of each area’s gastronomic and cultural traditions, taste their excellent products and experience a true journey of discovery via images, sensations and flavors.

From October 25 to 29, the people who live and work in these areas will be sharing the beauty of their land and the wealth of their culture with the visitors and producers of the Salone del Gusto and Terra Madre.

Translate this!
Español
Français
Portugués
Italiano

Links
http://pathsofexcellence.org
www.rimisp.org
www.slowfood.com
http://salonedelgustoterramadre.slowfood.com/
Videos

Social Feeds
An IFAD delegation is attending the event in Turin. Wish you were there? Follow the proceedings via Facebook and Twitter.




Facebook

Twitter





Share It!

Rural territories in motion

Posted by Greg Benchwick Monday, October 15, 2012 0 comments

Rural Territorial Dynamics Program – Final Report 2007-2012



Between 2007 and 2012 the Rural Territorial Dynamics Program worked with more than 50 organizations in 11 Latin American countries to explain why some rural territories have achieved greater economic growth, environmental sustainability and social inclusion, while others have demonstrated notable lags in development. With the knowledge from this work, the program collaborated in the design and implementation of public strategies, policies, programs and projects throughout the region. The program benefited from the support of IDRC Canada, IFAD and the New Zealand Aid Programme. The final report prepared by the implementation agency, the Rimisp Latin American Center for Rural Development, highlights the lessons learned from this innovative program. Learn more by visiting the Rural Territorial Dynamics web portal.


Informe Final del Programa Dinámicas Territoriales Rurales 2007-2012


"El programa Dinámicas Territoriales Rurales (DTR) está llegando a su término. Han sido muchos sus aportes a lo largo de cinco años de trabajo. El más importante de ellos se resume en un concepto: 
ha contribuido a poner en la agenda del desarrollo de América Latina la idea de que el territorio 
importa, tanto porque se observan persistentes desigualdades territoriales que permanecen opacadas 
bajo los promedios, como porque la ceguera respecto de la dimensión territorial genera ineficiencia 
económica al desperdiciar las oportunidades localizadas en los territorios. Éste programa aporta 
un concepto más comprensivo y complejo del desarrollo rural, y constituye una contribución a las 
políticas públicas latinoamericanas sobre desarrollo territorial rural, que es resultado del trabajo de 
un amplio arco de cerca de 50 organizaciones que forman parte de la red de socios del programa..." - Claudia Serrano, Directora Ejecutiva de Rimisp. 



Learn more
www.rimisp.org/dtr

Share it!