Policy

Costs

Studies consistently find that the death penalty is more expensive than alternative punishments.

DPI Report: The 2% Death Penalty

DPI Report: The 2% Death Penalty

How a Minority of Counties Produce Most Death Cases at Enormous Costs to All

DPI Report: Smart on Crime

DPI Report: Smart on Crime

Reconsidering the Death Penalty in a Time of Economic Crisis

Overview

The death penal­ty is a moral issue for some and a pol­i­cy issue for oth­ers. However, it is also a gov­ern­ment pro­gram with relat­ed costs. Many peo­ple assume that the state saves mon­ey by employ­ing the death penal­ty since an exe­cut­ed per­son no longer requires con­fine­ment, health care, and relat­ed expens­es. But in the mod­ern appli­ca­tion of cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment, that assump­tion has been repeat­ed­ly proven to be wrong.

The death penal­ty is far more expen­sive than a sys­tem uti­liz­ing life-with­out-parole sen­tences as an alter­na­tive pun­ish­ment. Some of the rea­sons for the high cost of the death penal­ty are the longer tri­als and appeals required when a person’s life is on the line, the need for more lawyers and experts on both sides of the case, and the rel­a­tive rar­i­ty of exe­cu­tions. Most cas­es in which the death penal­ty is sought do not end up with the death penal­ty being imposed. And once a death sen­tence is imposed, the most like­ly out­come of the case is that the con­vic­tion or death sen­tence will be over­turned in the courts. Most defen­dants who are sen­tenced to death essen­tial­ly end up spend­ing life in prison, but at a high­ly inflat­ed cost because the death penal­ty was involved in the process.

The Issue

How much the death penal­ty actu­al­ly costs and how that com­pares to a sys­tem in which a life sen­tence is the max­i­mum pun­ish­ment can only be deter­mined by sophis­ti­cat­ed research and stud­ies, usu­al­ly at the state lev­el. Many such stud­ies have been con­duct­ed and their con­clu­sions are con­sis­tent: the death penal­ty impos­es a net cost on the tax­pay­ers com­pared to life with­out parole. The ques­tion is whether the assumed ben­e­fits of the death penal­ty are worth its costs and whether oth­er sys­tems might pro­vide sim­i­lar ben­e­fits at less cost. The assess­ments of law enforce­ment experts are par­tic­u­lar­ly rel­e­vant in iden­ti­fy­ing what expen­di­tures are most effec­tive in reducing crime.

What DPIC Offers

This sec­tion con­tains sum­maries of each of the main cost stud­ies on the death penal­ty and links to many of the entire stud­ies. In addi­tion, DPI has pre­pared a num­ber of reports that relate to the ques­tion of costs and to the opin­ions of police chiefs and oth­er experts in this field.

Why is the death penalty so expensive?

  • Legal costs: Almost all peo­ple who face the death penal­ty can­not afford their own attor­ney. The state must assign pub­lic defend­ers or court-appoint­ed lawyers to rep­re­sent them (the accept­ed prac­tice is to assign two lawyers), and pay for the costs of the pros­e­cu­tion as well.
  • Pre-tri­al costs: Capital cas­es are far more com­pli­cat­ed than non-cap­i­tal cas­es and take longer to go to tri­al. Experts will prob­a­bly be need­ed on foren­sic evi­dence, men­tal health, and the back­ground and life his­to­ry of the defen­dant. County tax­pay­ers pick up the costs of added secu­ri­ty and longer pre-trial detention.
  • Jury selec­tion: Because of the need to ques­tion jurors thor­ough­ly on their views about the death penal­ty, jury selec­tion in cap­i­tal cas­es is much more time con­sum­ing and expensive.
  • Trial: Death-penal­ty tri­als can last more than four times longer than non-cap­i­tal tri­als, requir­ing juror and attor­ney com­pen­sa­tion, in addi­tion to court per­son­nel and oth­er related costs.
  • Incarceration: Most death rows involve soli­tary con­fine­ment in a spe­cial facil­i­ty. These require more secu­ri­ty and oth­er accom­mo­da­tions as the pris­on­ers are kept for 23 hours a day in their cells.
  • Appeals: To min­i­mize mis­takes, every pris­on­er is enti­tled to a series of appeals. The costs are borne at tax­pay­ers’ expense. These appeals are essen­tial because some inmates have come with­in hours of exe­cu­tion before evi­dence was uncov­ered prov­ing their innocence.

News & Developments


News

Jan 13, 2026

Texas Report Highlights Decline of New Death Sentences and Executions

For decades, Texas per­formed exe­cu­tions at the high­est rate in the coun­try. It has car­ried out the most exe­cu­tions in the mod­ern era, with near­ly five times the num­ber as the next high­est state. However, that trend has changed in recent years, as both the num­ber of new death sen­tences and exe­cu­tions has sig­nif­i­cant­ly declined. The Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty’s (TCADP) 2025 Annual Report exam­ines the dwin­dling use of cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment and the…

Read More

News

Nov 03, 2025

New Documents Reveal Texas Has Spent More Than $775,000 on Lethal Injection Drugs Since October 2024 — But Many Other Details Remain Secret

Documents reviewed by NBC News in response to a pub­lic records request reveal that since October 2024 Texas has spent more than $775,000 to acquire pen­to­bar­bi­tal, the drug used in the state’s lethal injec­tion exe­cu­tion pro­to­col. During the same time frame, the state has car­ried out 6 exe­cu­tions. The records show that in September 2024, the state obtained 20 one-gram vials of pen­to­bar­bi­tal and an addi­tion­al eight 2.5‑gram vials in February 2025. Per the state’s protocol,…

Read More

News

Oct 30, 2025

Low Death Sentencing, Lack of Deterrence, and High Costs Raise Questions Over Capital Punishment in Indiana

Indiana’s seem­ing­ly para­dox­i­cal resump­tion of exe­cu­tions, with three over the last year, is draw­ing scruti­ny from many cor­ners of the state. Governor Mike Braun, leg­is­la­tors from both polit­i­cal par­ties, pub­lic defend­ers and even pros­e­cu­tors have raised ques­tions about the costs of pros­e­cut­ing cap­i­tal cas­es and obtain­ing drugs for exe­cu­tions; the fail­ure of cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment to deter crime; and the increas­ing reluc­tance of Indiana juries to sentence…

Read More

News

Oct 20, 2025

DPI Podcast 12:01 The Death Penalty in Context: Maha Jweied of The Responsible Business Initiative for Justice Discusses Intersection of Business and the Legal System

In October 2025’s episode of 12:01: The Death Penalty in Context, DPI man­ag­ing direc­tor Anne Holsinger inter­views Maha Jweied. Ms. Jweied, the CEO of The Responsible Business Initiative for Justice (RBIJ), is an inter­na­tion­al­ly rec­og­nized expert on the role of the pri­vate sec­tor in jus­tice sys­tems and an advo­cate for improved access to jus­tice world­wide. During the pod­cast, Ms. Jweied describes RBIJ’s mis­sion of work­ing with busi­ness lead­ers to push for criminal…

Read More

News

Oct 09, 2025

Indiana’s Scheduled Third Execution After 15-year Pause Raises Cost and Secrecy Concerns

Indiana is set to exe­cute Roy Lee Ward on October 10, 2025, despite ongo­ing con­cerns about the cost of lethal injec­tion and the lack of trans­paren­cy sur­round­ing the state’s exe­cu­tion pro­to­cols in the wake of a sus­pect­ed botched exe­cu­tion ear­li­er this year. Mr. Ward will be the third indi­vid­ual exe­cut­ed after a 15-year pause in exe­cu­tions in Indiana. In July 2025, Governor Mike Braun said he would not renew the state’s sup­ply of lethal injec­tion drugs, noting the…

Read More