<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/">
<title>econ updates on arXiv.org</title>
<link>http://arxiv.org/</link>
<description rdf:parseType="Literal">Economics (econ) updates on the arXiv.org e-print archive</description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:date>2021-01-12T20:30:00-05:00</dc:date>
<dc:publisher>www-admin@arxiv.org</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject>Economics</dc:subject>
<syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
<syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
<syn:updatePeriod>daily</syn:updatePeriod>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.04164" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.04222" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.04346" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.04447" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.04486" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.04529" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.04618" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1911.08521" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.04263" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.06528" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/icons/sfx.gif" />
</channel>
<image rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/icons/sfx.gif">
<title>arXiv.org</title>
<url>http://arxiv.org/icons/sfx.gif</url>
<link>http://arxiv.org/</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.04164">
<title>Dynamic Ordering Learning in Multivariate Forecasting. (arXiv:2101.04164v1 [econ.EM])</title>
<link>http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.04164</link>
<description rdf:parseType="Literal">&lt;p&gt;In many fields where the main goal is to produce sequential forecasts for
decisionmaking problems, the good understanding of the contemporaneous
relations among different series is crucial for the estimation of the
covariance matrix. In recent years, the modified Cholesky decomposition
appeared as a popular approach to covariance matrix estimation. However, its
main drawback relies on the imposition of the series ordering structure. In
this work, we propose a highly flexible and fast method to deal with the
problem of ordering uncertainty in a dynamic fashion with the use of Dynamic
Order Probabilities. We apply the proposed method in a dynamic portfolio
allocation problem, where the investor is able to learn the contemporaneous
relations among different currencies. We show that our approach generates not
just significant statistical improvements, but also huge economic gains for a
mean-variance investor relative to the Random Walk benchmark and using fixed
orders over time.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator> &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/find/econ/1/au:+Levy_B/0/1/0/all/0/1&quot;&gt;Bruno P. C. Levy&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/find/econ/1/au:+Lopes_H/0/1/0/all/0/1&quot;&gt;Hedibert F. Lopes&lt;/a&gt;</dc:creator>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.04222">
<title>Best-response dynamics, playing sequences, and convergence to equilibrium in random games. (arXiv:2101.04222v1 [econ.TH])</title>
<link>http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.04222</link>
<description rdf:parseType="Literal">&lt;p&gt;We show that the playing sequence--the order in which players update their
actions--is a crucial determinant of whether the best-response dynamic
converges to a Nash equilibrium. Specifically, we analyze the probability that
the best-response dynamic converges to a pure Nash equilibrium in random
$n$-player $m$-action games under three distinct playing sequences: clockwork
sequences (players take turns according to a fixed cyclic order), random
sequences, and simultaneous updating by all players. We analytically
characterize the convergence properties of the clockwork sequence best-response
dynamic. Our key asymptotic result is that this dynamic almost never converges
to a pure Nash equilibrium when $n$ and $m$ are large. By contrast, the random
sequence best-response dynamic converges almost always to a pure Nash
equilibrium when one exists and $n$ and $m$ are large. The clockwork
best-response dynamic deserves particular attention: we show through simulation
that, compared to random or simultaneous updating, its convergence properties
are closest to those exhibited by three popular learning rules that have been
calibrated to human game-playing in experiments (reinforcement learning,
fictitious play, and replicator dynamics).
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator> &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/find/econ/1/au:+Heinrich_T/0/1/0/all/0/1&quot;&gt;Torsten Heinrich&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/find/econ/1/au:+Jang_Y/0/1/0/all/0/1&quot;&gt;Yoojin Jang&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/find/econ/1/au:+Mungo_L/0/1/0/all/0/1&quot;&gt;Luca Mungo&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/find/econ/1/au:+Pangallo_M/0/1/0/all/0/1&quot;&gt;Marco Pangallo&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/find/econ/1/au:+Scott_A/0/1/0/all/0/1&quot;&gt;Alex Scott&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/find/econ/1/au:+Tarbush_B/0/1/0/all/0/1&quot;&gt;Bassel Tarbush&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/find/econ/1/au:+Wiese_S/0/1/0/all/0/1&quot;&gt;Samuel Wiese&lt;/a&gt;</dc:creator>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.04346">
<title>Empirical Decomposition of the IV-OLS Gap with Heterogeneous and Nonlinear Effects. (arXiv:2101.04346v1 [econ.EM])</title>
<link>http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.04346</link>
<description rdf:parseType="Literal">&lt;p&gt;This study proposes an econometric framework to interpret and empirically
decompose the difference between IV and OLS estimates given by the linear
regression equation when the true causal effects of the treatment are nonlinear
in treatment levels and heterogeneous across covariates. I show that the IV-OLS
coefficient gap consists of three estimable components: the difference in
weights on the covariates, the difference in weights on the treatment levels,
and the difference in identified marginal effects associated with endogeneity
bias. Applications of this framework to return-to-schooling estimates
demonstrate the empirical relevance of this distinction in properly
interpreting the IV-OLS coefficient gap.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator> &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/find/econ/1/au:+Ishimaru_S/0/1/0/all/0/1&quot;&gt;Shoya Ishimaru&lt;/a&gt;</dc:creator>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.04447">
<title>Learning and Upgrading in Global Value Chains: An Analysis of India&apos;s Manufacturing Sector. (arXiv:2101.04447v1 [econ.GN])</title>
<link>http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.04447</link>
<description rdf:parseType="Literal">&lt;p&gt;The topic of my research is &quot;Learning and Upgrading in Global Value Chains:
An Analysis of India&apos;s Manufacturing Sector&quot;. To analyse India&apos;s learning and
upgrading through position, functions, specialisation &amp;amp; value addition of
manufacturing GVCs, it is required to quantify the extent, drivers, and impacts
of India&apos;s Manufacturing links in GVCs. I have transformed this overall broad
objective into three fundamental questions: (1) What is the extent of India&apos;s
Manufacturing Links in GVCs? (2) What are the determinants of India&apos;s
Manufacturing Links in GVCs? (3) What are the impacts of India&apos;s Manufacturing
Links in GVCs? These three objectives represent my three chapters in my PhD
thesis.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator> &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/find/econ/1/au:+Dutta_S/0/1/0/all/0/1&quot;&gt;Sourish Dutta&lt;/a&gt;</dc:creator>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.04486">
<title>Dynamic pricing under nested logit demand. (arXiv:2101.04486v1 [math.OC])</title>
<link>http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.04486</link>
<description rdf:parseType="Literal">&lt;p&gt;Recently, there is growing interest and need for dynamic pricing algorithms,
especially, in the field of online marketplaces by offering smart pricing
options for big online stores. We present an approach to adjust prices based on
the observed online market data. The key idea is to characterize optimal prices
as minimizers of a total expected revenue function, which turns out to be
convex. We assume that consumers face information processing costs, hence,
follow a discrete choice demand model, and suppliers are equipped with quantity
adjustment costs. We prove the strong smoothness of the total expected revenue
function by deriving the strong convexity modulus of its dual. Our
gradient-based pricing schemes outbalance supply and demand at the convergence
rates of $\mathcal{O}(\frac{1}{t})$ and $\mathcal{O}(\frac{1}{t^2})$,
respectively. This suggests that the imperfect behavior of consumers and
suppliers helps to stabilize the market.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator> &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/find/math/1/au:+Muller_D/0/1/0/all/0/1&quot;&gt;David M&amp;#xfc;ller&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/find/math/1/au:+Nesterov_Y/0/1/0/all/0/1&quot;&gt;Yurii Nesterov&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/find/math/1/au:+Shikhman_V/0/1/0/all/0/1&quot;&gt;Vladimir Shikhman&lt;/a&gt;</dc:creator>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.04529">
<title>Narrow Bracketing in Work Choices. (arXiv:2101.04529v1 [econ.GN])</title>
<link>http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.04529</link>
<description rdf:parseType="Literal">&lt;p&gt;Many important economic outcomes result from cumulative effects of smaller
choices, so the best outcomes require accounting for other choices at each
decision point. We document narrow bracketing -- the neglect of such accounting
-- in work choices in a pre-registered experiment on MTurk: bracketing changes
average willingness to work by 13-28%. In our experiment, broad bracketing is
so simple to implement that narrow bracketing cannot possibly be due to optimal
conservation of cognitive resources, so it must be suboptimal. We jointly
estimate disutility of work and bracketing, finding gender differences in
convexity of disutility, but not in bracketing.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator> &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/find/econ/1/au:+Fallucchi_F/0/1/0/all/0/1&quot;&gt;Francesco Fallucchi&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/find/econ/1/au:+Kaufmann_M/0/1/0/all/0/1&quot;&gt;Marc Kaufmann&lt;/a&gt;</dc:creator>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.04618">
<title>Social Media, Content Moderation, and Technology. (arXiv:2101.04618v1 [econ.GN])</title>
<link>http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.04618</link>
<description rdf:parseType="Literal">&lt;p&gt;This paper develops a theoretical model to study the economic incentives for
a social media platform to moderate user-generated content. We show that a
self-interested platform can use content moderation as an effective marketing
tool to expand its installed user base, to increase the utility of its users,
and to achieve its positioning as a moderate or extreme content platform. The
optimal content moderation strategy differs for platforms with different
revenue models, advertising or subscription. We also show that a platform&apos;s
content moderation strategy depends on its technical sophistication. Because of
imperfect technology, a platform may optimally throw away the moderate content
more than the extreme content. Therefore, one cannot judge how extreme a
platform is by just looking at its content moderation strategy. Furthermore, we
show that a platform under advertising does not necessarily benefit from a
better technology for content moderation, but one under subscription does. This
means that platforms under different revenue models can have different
incentives to improve their content moderation technology. Finally, we draw
managerial and policy implications from our insights.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator> &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/find/econ/1/au:+Liu_Y/0/1/0/all/0/1&quot;&gt;Yi Liu&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/find/econ/1/au:+Yildirim_T/0/1/0/all/0/1&quot;&gt;T. Pinar Yildirim&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/find/econ/1/au:+Zhang_Z/0/1/0/all/0/1&quot;&gt;Z. John Zhang&lt;/a&gt;</dc:creator>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1911.08521">
<title>Synthetic Controls with Imperfect Pre-Treatment Fit. (arXiv:1911.08521v2 [econ.EM] UPDATED)</title>
<link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1911.08521</link>
<description rdf:parseType="Literal">&lt;p&gt;We analyze the properties of the Synthetic Control (SC) and related
estimators when the pre-treatment fit is imperfect. In this framework, we show
that these estimators are generally biased if treatment assignment is
correlated with unobserved confounders, even when the number of pre-treatment
periods goes to infinity. Still, we show that a demeaned version of the SC
method can substantially improve in terms of bias and variance relative to the
difference-in-difference estimator. We also derive a specification test for the
demeaned SC estimator in this setting with imperfect pre-treatment fit. Given
our theoretical results, we provide practical guidance for applied researchers
on how to justify the use of such estimators in empirical applications.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator> &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/find/econ/1/au:+Ferman_B/0/1/0/all/0/1&quot;&gt;Bruno Ferman&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/find/econ/1/au:+Pinto_C/0/1/0/all/0/1&quot;&gt;Cristine Pinto&lt;/a&gt;</dc:creator>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.04263">
<title>Mechanism Design for Large Scale Network Utility Maximization. (arXiv:2003.04263v2 [cs.GT] UPDATED)</title>
<link>http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.04263</link>
<description rdf:parseType="Literal">&lt;p&gt;Network utility maximization (NUM) is a general framework for designing
distributed optimization algorithms for large-scale networks. An economic
challenge arises in the presence of strategic agents&apos; private information.
Existing studies proposed (economic) mechanisms but largely neglected the issue
of large-scale implementation. Specifically, they require certain modifications
to the deployed algorithms, which may bring the significant cost. To tackle
this challenge, we present the large-scale Vickery-Clark-Grove (VCG) Mechanism
for NUM, with a simpler payment rule characterized by the shadow prices. The
Large-Scale VCG Mechanism maximizes the network utility and achieves individual
rationality and budget balance. With infinitely many agents, agents&apos; truthful
reports of their types are their dominant strategies; for the finite case, each
agent&apos;s incentive to misreport converges quadratically to zero. For practical
implementation, we introduce a modified mechanism that possesses an additional
important technical property, superimposability, which makes it able to be
built upon any (potentially distributed) algorithm that optimally solves the
NUM Problem and ensures all agents to obey the algorithm. We then extend this
idea to the dynamic case, when agents&apos; types are dynamically evolving as a
controlled Markov process. In this case, the mechanism leads to incentive
compatible actions of agent for each time slot.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator> &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/find/cs/1/au:+Zhang_M/0/1/0/all/0/1&quot;&gt;Meng Zhang&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/find/cs/1/au:+Vasal_D/0/1/0/all/0/1&quot;&gt;Deepanshu Vasal&lt;/a&gt;</dc:creator>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.06528">
<title>Learning Personalized Policy with Strategic Agents. (arXiv:2011.06528v2 [econ.EM] UPDATED)</title>
<link>http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.06528</link>
<description rdf:parseType="Literal">&lt;p&gt;There is increasing interest in allocating treatments based on observed
individual data: examples include heterogeneous pricing, individualized credit
offers, and targeted social programs. Personalized policy introduces incentives
for individuals to modify their behavior to obtain a better treatment. We show
standard risk minimization-based estimators are sub-optimal when observed
covariates are endogenous to the treatment allocation rule. We propose a
dynamic experiment that converges to the optimal treatment allocation function
without parametric assumptions on individual strategic behavior, and prove that
it has regret that decays at a linear rate. We validate the method in
simulations and in a small MTurk experiment.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator> &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/find/econ/1/au:+Munro_E/0/1/0/all/0/1&quot;&gt;Evan Munro&lt;/a&gt;</dc:creator>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>