<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>epic.org</title>
      <link>http://epic.org/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2016</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2016 15:15:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Presidential Science Advisors Challenge Validity of Criminal Forensic Techniques</title>
         <description><![CDATA[According to an upcoming report by the President&#8217;s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, much of the forensic analysis in criminal trials is not scientifically valid. The report, to be released this month, attacks the validity of analysis of evidence like bite-marks, hair, and firearms. The "lack of rigor in the assessment of the scientific validity of forensic evidence is not just a hypothetical problem but a real and significant weakness in the judicial system,&#8221; wrote the council. The Senate Judiciary Committee held hearings in <a href="http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/the-need-to-strengthen-forensic-science-in-the-united-states_the-national-academy-of-sciences-report-on-a-path-forward">2009</a> and <a href="http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/improving-forensic-science-in-the-criminal-justice-system-2012-07-18">2012</a> to discuss the need to strengthen forensic science, and Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) introduced a <a href="https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/senate-bill/2177">forensic reform bill</a> in 2014. EPIC has <a href="https://epic.org/2016/02/epic-foia---information-about-.html">pursued</a> FOIA requests on the reliability of <a href="https://epic.org/state-policy/foia/dna-software/">proprietary forensic techniques</a>. EPIC also filed a <a href="https://epic.org/amicus/harris/EPIC-Amicus-Brief.pdf">brief</a> on the reliability of novel forensic techniques in the Supreme Court case <a href="https://epic.org/amicus/harris/">Florida v. Harris</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2016/09/presidential-science-advisors-.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2016/09/presidential-science-advisors-.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Top News</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">algorithmic transparency</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">florida v harris</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">forensic evidence</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2016 15:15:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Pokemon GO Developer Niantic Responds to Sen. Franken Inquiry into Privacy Concerns</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Pokemon GO developer Niantic has <a href="https://www.franken.senate.gov/?p=press_release&amp;id=3532">responded</a> to <a href="https://www.franken.senate.gov/">Sen. Al Franken</a>&#8217;s <a href="http://www.franken.senate.gov/files/letter/160712_PokemonGO.pdf">request</a> for information concerning the <a href="https://www.nianticlabs.com/privacy/pokemongo/en">company&#8217;s data practices</a>. Sen. Franken&#8217;s letter, sent in early July, asked Niantic to clarify the scope, purpose, and necessity of its data collection practices. Niantic&#8217;s <a href="https://www.franken.senate.gov/files/documents/160826NianticResponse.pdf">response letter</a> indicates that it &#8220;collects and stores&#8221; user location data to place and position users on the game&#8217;s map, but fails to explain why and for how long location data is stored. Franken also directed the company to provide a current list of the "third party service providers" with whom user data is shared. Niantic&#8217;s letter confirms that it hires third parties to provide a variety of services, but does not specifically identify any of these companies. Privacy officials in <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/news/pokemon-go-canada-class-action-lawsuit-gym-home-torrington-alberta/">Canada</a>, <a href="http://fortune.com/2016/07/20/pokemon-go-germany-privacy/">Europe</a>, and <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/jul/22/pokemon-go-launches-in-japan-amid-safety-warnings">Asia</a>, have begun investigations of Niantic, which is tied to the Google company Alphabet. The Niantic CEO led the <a href="https://epic.org/privacy/streetview/">Google project</a> that captured private communications in more than 30 countries around the world. The initial Pokemon Go release provided Niantic full access to the user's Google account. EPIC sent a <a href="https://epic.org/privacy/ftc/FTC-letter-Pokemon-GO-07-22-2016.pdf">letter</a> to the FTC urging the Commission to investigate the privacy risks posed by Pokemon GO,  Niantic&#8217;s data collection practices, and its ties to Google.]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2016/09/pokemon-go-developer-niantic-r.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2016/09/pokemon-go-developer-niantic-r.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Top News</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">consumer</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Pokemon GO</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2016 09:12:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>EPIC, Coalition Reject Calls to Further Weaken FCC&apos;s Modest Privacy Proposal</title>
         <description><![CDATA[EPIC and a coalition of consumer privacy advocates have sent a letter to the Federal Communications Commission in response to industry demands to further weaken the FCC's <a href="https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2016-04-20/pdf/2016-08458.pdf">proposed broadband privacy rules</a>. The groups rejects efforts  by Internet Service Providers to exempt anonymized consumer data from the privacy rules and to require opt-in consent only for sensitive information. The consumer groups also oppose mandatory arbitration and &#8220;pay-for-privacy&#8221; plans that would require consumers to pay fees for basic privacy safeguards. EPIC has called the FCC's proposed privacy rules a "<a href="https://epic.org/apa/comments/EPIC-FCC-Privacy-NPRM-Reply-Comments-07.06.16.pdf">modest first step</a>" and <a href="https://epic.org/apa/comments/EPIC-FCC-Privacy-NPRM-2016.pdf">repeatedly</a> <a href="https://epic.org/privacy/consumer/EPIC-to-FCC-on-Communications-Privacy.pdf">argued</a> that the Commission <a href="https://epic.org/privacy/consumer/EPIC-FCC-Privacy-Rules.pdf">can and should go further</a>  to "address the full range of communications privacy issues facing US consumers."]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2016/09/epic-coalition-reject-calls-to.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2016/09/epic-coalition-reject-calls-to.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Top News</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">consumer</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">FCC</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 20:04:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>House Report Criticizes OPM Handling of Massive Data Breach Last Year</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>In a <a href="https://oversight.house.gov/release/committee-releases-year-long-investigative-report-opm-data-breaches/">press release</a>, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee released a <a href="https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/The-OPM-Data-Breach-How-the-Government-Jeopardized-Our-National-Security-for-More-than-a-Generation.pdf">report</a> criticizing the Office of Personnel Management&#8217;s handling of the data breach in 2015. The breach compromised the information of over 21.5 million individuals, including federal employees, their families and friends. The report concluded the OPM breach was preventable and recommended numerous measures including less use of social security numbers. For many years, EPIC has <a href="https://epic.org/privacy/big-data/EPIC-OSTP-Big-Data.pdf">urged the Administration</a> and <a href="http://financialservices.house.gov/uploadedfiles/091411rotenberg.pdf">Congress</a> to promote Privacy Enhancing Techniques that minimize or eliminate the collection of personally identifiable information. EPIC has also supported <a href="https://epic.org/privacy/ssn/testimony_0500.html">new limits</a> on the collection and use of the <a href="https://www.epic.org/privacy/ssn/">SSN</a>. This year EPIC launched &#8220;<a href="http://www.dataprotection2016.org/">Data Protection 2016</a>,&#8221; a non-partisan campaign to make data protection an issue in the 2016 election.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2016/09/house-report-criticizes-opm-ha.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2016/09/house-report-criticizes-opm-ha.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Top News</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">data breach</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">data breaches</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Data Protection 2016</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 13:26:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>FTC Responds to EPIC&apos;s Complaint about WhatsApp</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The Federal Trade Commission has <a href="/privacy/ftc/whatsapp/FTC-Response-to-EPIC-CDD-WhatsApp-Complaint.pdf">responded</a> to the EPIC and <a href="https://www.democraticmedia.org/filing/electronic-privacy-information-center-cdd-defend-privacy-rights-whatsapp-users">Center for Digital Democracy</a> <a href="https://epic.org/privacy/ftc/whatsapp/EPIC-CDD-FTC-WhatsApp-Complaint-2016.pdf">complaint</a> about WhatsApp's <a href="https://blog.whatsapp.com/10000627/Looking-ahead-for-WhatsApp">plan</a> to transfer user data, including verified phone numbers, to Facebook. The FTC stated that it prohibits companies from engaging in unfair and deceptive practices and will enforce its <a href="https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2011/11/facebook-settles-ftc-charges-it-deceived-consumers-failing-keep">2012 Consent Order</a> with Facebook. The FTC letter also acknowledged that the EPIC-CDD complaint &#8220;contains allegations regarding statements WhatsApp has made about how it limits the use of mobile phone numbers or other personally identifiable information." The FTC said it will "carefully review" EPIC&#8217;s complaint. EPIC and CDD wrote that WhatsApp's plan to transfer user data to Facebook for user profiling and targeted advertising - without first obtaining users' opt-in consent - contradicts <a href="https://epic.org/privacy/internet/ftc/whatsapp/FTC-facebook-whatsapp-ltr.pdf">numerous</a> <a href="https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2014/04/ftc-notifies-facebook-whatsapp-privacy-obligations-light-proposed">FTC</a> <a href="https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/blogs/business-blog/2015/03/mergers-privacy-promises">statements</a> and violates <a href="https://epic.org/privacy/internet/ftc/Authority.html">Section 5</a> of the FTC Act. EPIC and CDD previously <a href="https://epic.org/privacy/internet/ftc/whatsapp/">warned the Commission</a> that it must protect the privacy interests of WhatsApp users following the acquisition by Facebook.]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2016/09/ftc-responds-to-epics-complain.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2016/09/ftc-responds-to-epics-complain.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Top News</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">FTC</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">social media privacy</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">WhatsApp</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 10:19:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>EPIC, Consumer Coalition Tells FCC to Protect Privacy, Security in Connected Cars </title>
         <description><![CDATA[EPIC has joined a coalition of consumer groups in a <a href="https://www.publicknowledge.org/documents/letter-to-the-fcc-on-dsrc-safety-and-privacy">letter</a> to the FCC supporting safety rules for connected cars. The consumer groups endorsed  a <a href="https://www.publicknowledge.org/documents/pk-fcc-petition-for-rulemaking-on-dedicated-short-range-communications-serv">petition for rulemaking</a>, filed earlier this year, that would establish safeguards for car communications networks. EPIC has testified before Congress on the risks of <a href="https://epic.org/privacy/edrs/EPIC-Connected-Cars-Testimony-Nov-18-2015.pdf">connected cars</a> and recently filed an amicus brief in federal appeals court on  <a href="https://epic.org/privacy/edrs/EPIC-NHTSA-V2V-Cmts.pdf">vehicle-to-vehicle communications</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2016/08/epic-consumer-coalition-tells-.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2016/08/epic-consumer-coalition-tells-.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Top News</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">connected cars</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">consumer</category>
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:37:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>EPIC, CDD Charge WhatsApp Policy Change Unlawful, Urge FTC to Act</title>
         <description><![CDATA[EPIC and the Center for Digital Democracy have filed a <a href="https://epic.org/privacy/ftc/whatsapp/EPIC-CDD-FTC-WhatsApp-Complaint-2016.pdf">complaint</a> with the FTC concerning WhatsApp&#8217;s <a href="https://blog.whatsapp.com/10000627/Looking-ahead-for-WhatsApp">plan</a> to transfer user data, including personal phone numbers, to Facebook. This reversal contradicts WhatsApp&#8217;s <a href="https://www.whatsapp.com/legal/?doc=privacy-policy&amp;version=20120707">previous</a> <a href="https://blog.whatsapp.com/499/Facebook?">promises</a> to users that their personal information would not be disclosed and would not be used for marketing purposes. EPIC said that WhatsApp change in business practices is unlawful and that the FTC is obligated to act. EPIC previously filed a <a href="https://epic.org/privacy/ftc/whatsapp/WhatsApp-Complaint.pdf">complaint</a> with the FTC over <a href="https://epic.org/privacy/internet/ftc/whatsapp/">Facebook&#8217;s acquisition of WhatsApp</a> in 2014. In response, the FTC <a href="https://epic.org/privacy/internet/ftc/whatsapp/FTC-facebook-whatsapp-ltr.pdf">warned</a> the two companies they must honor their privacy promises to users. The FTC has <a href="https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/media-resources/protecting-consumer-privacy/enforcing-privacy-promises">said</a> "When companies tell consumers they will safeguard their personal information, the FTC can and does take law enforcement action to make sure that companies live up these promises."]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2016/08/epic-cdd-charge-whatsapp-polic.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2016/08/epic-cdd-charge-whatsapp-polic.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Top News</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">consumer</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Facebook</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">FTC</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">in re Facebook</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">WhatsApp</category>
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 13:23:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Facebook to Collect WhatsApp User Data, Violating FTC Order and Privacy Promises</title>
         <description><![CDATA[WhatsApp has <a href="https://blog.whatsapp.com/10000627/Looking-ahead-for-WhatsApp">announced</a> plans to disclose user information to Facebook, including phone numbers and other user data, that will be connected with Facebook profiles. Facebook <a href="https://epic.org/privacy/internet/ftc/whatsapp/">purchased</a> WhatsApp in 2014, and the companies <a href="https://blog.whatsapp.com/529/Setting-the-record-straight">promised</a> users of the privacy-protective messaging service that &#8220;<a href="https://blog.whatsapp.com/499/Facebook">nothing</a>&#8221; will change for WhatsApp users' privacy. EPIC filed a <a href="https://epic.org/privacy/ftc/whatsapp/WhatsApp-Complaint.pdf">complaint</a> with the FTC over the deal, and the FTC <a href="https://epic.org/privacy/internet/ftc/whatsapp/FTC-facebook-whatsapp-ltr.pdf">responded</a> by warning the two companies that they must honor their privacy promises to WhatsApp users. The letter explained that failure to obtain users' opt-in consent before changing data practices would be an unfair and deceptive trade practice and violate <a href="https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/cases/2012/08/120810facebookdo.pdf">Facebook&#8217;s FTC Consent Order</a>. WhatsApp&#8217;s recent announcement indicates users will have 30 days to <a href="https://www.whatsapp.com/faq/general/26000016">opt-out</a> of data transfers to Facebook, in violation of the law and the FTC&#8217;s Order.  In 2012, EPIC and a coalition of consumer privacy organizations also led a <a href="https://epic.org/privacy/inrefacebook/">successful effort</a> at the FTC after Facebook changed the privacy settings of its users. As a result, Facebook is subject to an <a href="https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2011/11/facebook-settles-ftc-charges-it-deceived-consumers-failing-keep">FTC consent order</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2016/08/facebook-to-collect-whatsapp-u.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2016/08/facebook-to-collect-whatsapp-u.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Top News</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">consumer</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Facebook</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">social media privacy</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">WhatsApp</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2016 17:08:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>EPIC Sues FAA, Challenges Failure to Establish Drone Privacy Safeguards</title>
         <description><![CDATA[EPIC has filed <a href="/privacy/litigation/apa/faa/drones/EPIC-Petition-08222016.pdf">suit</a> against the Federal Aviation Administration, arguing the agency failed to establish privacy rules for <a href="/privacy/drones/">drones</a> as required by Congress. Congress in 2012 ordered the FAA to issue "comprehensive" rules for drone use. EPIC and more than 100 organizations and experts subsequently <a href="/privacy/drones/FAA-553e-Petition-03-08-12.pdf">urged the FAA</a> to establish privacy protections prior to permitting widespread drone deployment. The FAA <a href="/privacy/drones/FAA-Privacy-Rulemaking-Letter.pdf">denied</a> EPIC's petition. EPIC then <a href="/privacy/litigation/apa/faa/drones/">sued the agency</a>, but a federal appeals court <a href="/privacy/litigation/apa/faa/drones/1612391-Opinion.pdf">ruled</a> that EPIC's suit was premature because the agency had not yet issued a final rule and might still consider the privacy concerns raised by EPIC and others. The FAA then proceeded to <a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2016/06/28/2016-15079/operation-and-certification-of-small-unmanned-aircraft-systems" target="_blank">issue final rules</a> for small drones without privacy safeguards. EPIC is now <a href="/privacy/litigation/apa/faa/drones/">challenging</a> the agency final rule.]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2016/08/epic-sues-faa-challenges-failu-1.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2016/08/epic-sues-faa-challenges-failu-1.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Top News</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">drones</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">EPIC v FAA</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">FAA</category>
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:40:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>EPIC Opposes DHS Plan to Collect Social Media Identifiers</title>
         <description><![CDATA[In <a href="/apa/comments/EPIC-Comments-DHS-Social-Media-IDs.pdf">comments</a> to the Department of Homeland Security, EPIC urged the agency to drop a plan to review the social media accounts of people seeking to visit the U.S. EPIC argued that the proposal threatens important First Amendment rights, risked abuse, and would disproportionately impact against minority groups. <a href="/foia/epic-v-dhs-media-monitoring/">Documents</a> obtained by EPIC in 2011 in a <a href="/foia/epic-v-dhs-media-monitoring/">Freedom of Information Act lawsuit</a> revealed that the DHS gathered social media comments to identify individuals, including US citizens, critical of the agency and the government. A 2012 <a href="https://homeland.house.gov/hearing/subcommittee-hearing-dhs-monitoring-social-networking-and-media-enhancing-intelligence/" target="_blank">Congressional hearing</a>, based on the documents obtained by EPIC, revealed bipartisan opposition to the original DHS social media monitoring program.]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2016/08/epic-opposes-dhs-plan-to-colle.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2016/08/epic-opposes-dhs-plan-to-colle.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Top News</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">APA</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">DHS</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">EPIC v. DHS</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">FOIA</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">foia</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Media Monitoring</category>
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:35:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>EPIC Launches EPIC Amicus Tracker to Assist Public Interest Litigators</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Today EPIC <a href="https://epic.org/amicus/tracker/EPIC-Press-Release-Amicus-Tracker.pdf">launched</a> the <a href="https://epic.org/amicus/tracker/">EPIC Amicus Tracker</a>, a public resource designed to help public interest litigators pursue significant privacy and civil liberties cases. The EPIC Amicus Tracker highlights cases with upcoming amicus opportunities and links to related EPIC amicus briefs. Over twenty years, EPIC has filed nearly 100 <a href="https://epic.org/amicus/">amicus briefs</a>, often with the participation of technical experts and legal scholars, in federal and state cases concerning emerging privacy and civil liberties issues and EPIC is frequently cited in judicial opinions. EPIC hopes the EPIC Amicus Tracker will inspire other public interest litigators.]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2016/08/epic-launches-epic-amicus-trac.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2016/08/epic-launches-epic-amicus-trac.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Top News</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">amicus</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">tracker</category>
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 12:40:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>EPIC, Verified Voting, Common Cause Release Report on Ballot Secrecy</title>
         <description><![CDATA[EPIC, Verified Voting, and Common Cause today released <a href="http://secretballotatrisk.org/"><em>The Secret Ballot at Risk: Recommendations for Protecting Democracy</em></a>, a report highlighting the right to a secret ballot and how Internet voting threatens voter privacy. All 50 states recognize ballot secrecy as a core value. Despite this, 32 states and DC are promoting Internet voting, typically for overseas and military voters, and are asking those voters to waive their right to a secret ballot. That threatens voting freedom and election integrity. The report recommends actions voters can take to protect the secrecy of their ballot, and encourages states to do more to safeguard voter privacy. EPIC has a long history of working to protect <a href="https://epic.org/privacy/voting/voterid.pdf">voter privacy</a> and <a href="https://epic.org/privacy/voting/">election integrity</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2016/08/epic-verified-voting-common-ca.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2016/08/epic-verified-voting-common-ca.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Top News</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">state policy</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">voter privacy</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 13:29:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>EPIC Urges Wisconsin Legislature to Safeguard Student Privacy</title>
         <description><![CDATA[In </span><a href="https://epic.org/state-policy/WI-Student-Privacy-EPIC-testimony.pdf">testimony</a><span> for the Wisconsin legislature, EPIC urged state lawmakers to protect </span><a href="https://epic.org/privacy/student/">student privacy</a><span>. </span><span>EPIC's testimony: (1) explained how the U.S. Education Department weakened key safeguards for student records,  (2) described the privacy risks that students today face,  (3) underscored the need for data security safeguards for student information, and (4) recommended that Wisconsin adopt </span><a href="https://epic.org/privacy/student/bill-of-rights.html">EPIC's Student Privacy Bill of Rights</a><span>. </span><span> </span><span>EPIC has previously urged </span><a href="https://epic.org/apa/ferpa/EPIC-ED-Student-Privacy-Letter.pdf">Congress</a><span>, the </span><span>Education Department</span><span>, and the </span><a href="https://epic.org/2014/09/epic-urges-ftc-to-investigate.html">Federal Trade Commission</a><span> to </span><a href="https://epic.org/2013/12/company-adds-encryption-to-web.html">strengthen student privacy</a><span>. </span><a href="https://epic.org/state-policy/">EPIC's State Policy Project</a><span> is monitoring privacy bills nationwide.]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2016/08/epic-urges-wisconsin-legislatu.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2016/08/epic-urges-wisconsin-legislatu.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Top News</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">state policy</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">student privacy</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 14:07:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>EPIC and Coalition Recommend Improvements to Health Agency&#8217;s Open Government Rules</title>
         <description><![CDATA[In <a href="http://www.openthegovernment.org/sites/default/files/Comments_HHS%20Proposed%20Rule_FOIA%20Regulations.pdf">comments</a> to the Department of Health and Human Services, <a href="https://epic.org/open_gov/">EPIC</a> and a coalition of open government advocates urged the agency to update its FOIA rules to keep in line with the <a href="https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/337/">FOIA Improvement Act of 2016</a>. The coalition pressed the agency to &#8220;go further to ensure greater access to public interest information.&#8221; Signed into law by President Obama on the FOIA&#8217;s 50th anniversary, the FOIA Improvement Act creates a new portal for requesters, requires the proactive disclosure of frequently requested records, strengthens the FOIA ombudsman, and codifies the <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/FreedomofInformationAct">presumption of openness</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2016/08/epic-and-coalition-recommend-i.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2016/08/epic-and-coalition-recommend-i.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Top News</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">foia</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">open government</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 13:56:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Data Protection 2016: Nationwide Hotel Data Breach</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Sheraton, Hyatt, Westin, and Marriott hotels in 10 states and Washington, D.C. have <a href="http://www.heihotels.com/notice">announced</a> that <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-hotel-hacks-20160815-snap-story.html">hotel payment records were breached</a> beginning as early as March 2015. Malware discovered in at least <a href="http://www.heihotels.com/list-of-properties">20 hotels</a> across the country collected customers&#8217; names and payment card numbers, card expiration dates, and verification codes. Surprisingly, the hotels <a href="http://www.heihotels.com/notice/2">said that they will not notify individual customers</a> of the breach. Almost <a href="http://www.ncsl.org/research/telecommunications-and-information-technology/security-breach-notification-laws.aspx">every state in the country</a> has  a mandatory breach notification law. Hyatt announced <a href="http://www.wsj.com/articles/hyatt-says-data-breach-hit-250-hotels-in-some-50-countries-1452803305">another payment card breach</a> earlier this year at 250 hotels in approximately 50 countries. EPIC launched &#8220;<a href="http://www.dataprotection2016.org/">Data Protection 2016</a>,&#8221; a non-partisan campaign to make data protection an issue in the 2016 election, calling it &#8220;the most important, least well understood issue&#8221; of this election.]]></description>
         <link>http://epic.org/2016/08/data-protection-2016-nationwid.html</link>
         <guid>http://epic.org/2016/08/data-protection-2016-nationwid.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Top News</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">consumer</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">data breach</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Data Protection 2016</category>
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2016 17:55:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
