ಟ್ವೀಟ್‌ಗಳು

	LARC ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
	Rustenburg Herald @RustenbrgHerald	2 ಗಂ.
	Land invaders: Rustenburg not immune Read more: bit.ly/landinvaders pic.twitter.com/DvdEIbgFwG
	ಫೋಟೋ ನೋಡಿ ·

	LARC ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
	AfricanStudiesCentre @ASCLeiden	2 ಗಂ.
	Delivering #land ≠ Securing #livelihood ; Higher #productivity ≠ higher #welfare in the context of #Zimbabwe . Adequate state #policies are critical! Seminar by #BillKinsey with #MarjaSpierenburg as a discussant pic.twitter.com/jEHskocAjD
	ಫೋಟೋ ನೋಡಿ ·

	LARC ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
	SJC @sjcoalition	3 ಗಂ.
	ANOTHER EVICTION IN THE RAIN: This morning @SAPoliceService & @CityofCT evicted Greenpoint residents in the rain, taking away their materials & leaving their belongings in the rain. No officials would take responsibility or tell us why they were demolishing homes. #LandForLiving pic.twitter.com/5EGMYcdzad
	ಫೋಟೋ ನೋಡಿ ·

	LARC ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
	SA Land Observer @landobserverSA	7 ಗಂ.
	Malema in hot water for land occupation call sowetanlive.co.za/news/south-afr… via @SowetanLIVE
	ಸಾರಾಂಶ ನೋಡಿ ·

	LARC ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
	PMG @PMG_SA	2 ಗಂ.
	pmg.org.za | Posing written questions to Ministers is a key way in which #parliament holds the Executive to account. You can find all questions, and their replies, right here: pmg.org.za/question_repli… pic.twitter.com/BQ6U28QBQ6
	ಫೋಟೋ ನೋಡಿ ·

	LARC ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
	Oxfam South Africa @OxfamSA	6 ಗಂ.
	Rights groups and Indian company on collision course over Mpumalanga mine businesslive.co.za/bd/national/20… via @BDliveSA
	ಸಾರಾಂಶ ನೋಡಿ ·

	LARC ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
	LRC South Africa @LRC_SouthAfrica	5 ಗಂ.
	Let's stand with @CentreEnvRights and the affected communities against a coal mine in Mpumalanga that will threaten #WaterSecurity businesslive.co.za/bd/national/20…
	ಸಾರಾಂಶ ನೋಡಿ ·

	LARC @LarcUCT	8 ಗಂ.
	Adv Ngcukaitobi: it is insufficient to go to the broader tribe to extinguish the rights of a smaller subset of the tribe or individual rights. IPILRA was a definite move away from the approach in colonialism and apartheid to subsume rights into tribes.
	ಮಾಹಿತಿಗಳನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	LARC @LarcUCT	8 ಗಂ.
	Adv Ngcukaitobi: in this case a meeting of the entire tribe was who gave consent. This does not comply with IPILRA because it was not a meeting of those that actually held the rights and they did not give their consent.
	ಮಾಹಿತಿಗಳನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	LARC @LarcUCT	8 ಗಂ.
	Adv Ngcukaitobi: IPILRA requires that the holders of the rights are who must give their consent, requires clear notice and that a majority of people that actually hold the rights at a meeting must consent.
	ಮಾಹಿತಿಗಳನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	LARC @LarcUCT	8 ಗಂ.
	Adv Ngcukaitobi: s2 of IPILRA deals with how these rights can be taken away from the community, it requires holders of rights to give consent to being deprived of their rights.
	ಮಾಹಿತಿಗಳನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	LARC @LarcUCT	8 ಗಂ.
	Adv Ngcukaitobi: HC found that the meeting of broader Bakgatla tribe was enough to deprive families of their rights to land. This was incorrect.
	ಸ್ಥಳ ನೋಡಿ ·

	LARC @LarcUCT	8 ಗಂ.
	Adv Ngcukaitobi: MPRDA therefore cannot deprive families of their customary law rights because it is not a law that specifically deals with customary law. IPILRA must be complied with.
	ಸ್ಥಳ ನೋಡಿ ·

	LARC @LarcUCT	8 ಗಂ.
	Adv Ngcukaitobi: if they are to be deprived of these customary rights then the applicants need to know how these rights are to be deprived. MPRDA not clear about that but IPILRA does say because it is a law that specifically deals with customary law.
	ಸ್ಥಳ ನೋಡಿ ·

	LARC @LarcUCT	8 ಗಂ.
	Adv Ngcukaitobi: will be answering two questions. The relationship btw MPRDA and IPILRA. MPRDA did not destroy the families rights to land, and MPRDA says minerals go to the state and that land to communities
	ಸ್ಥಳ ನೋಡಿ ·

	LARC @LarcUCT	8 ಗಂ.
	Adv Ngcukaitobi: the Constitution requires that customary law be applied when it is necessary. This is the recognition that customary law was relegated to second class status under colonialism and apartheid
	ಮಾಹಿತಿಗಳನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	LARC @LarcUCT	8 ಗಂ.
	Adv Ngcukaitobi: on the relationship btw IPILRA and MPRDA: IPILRA still needs to be complied with as well as the MPRDA. The applicants are customary rights holders, therefore IPILRA must also be complied with
	ಮಾಹಿತಿಗಳನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	LARC @LarcUCT	8 ಗಂ.
	Adv Ngcukaitobi: the applicats were customary rights holders. The attitude of recognizing only the broader Bakgatla right and not individual and group rights barks back to approach of colonial and apartheid regime
	ಮಾಹಿತಿಗಳನ್ನು ನೋಡಿ ·

	LARC ಮರುಟ್ವೀಟಿಸಿದ್ದಾರೆ
	Johan Lorenzen @JohanLorenzen	8 ಗಂ.
	1. Advocate Ngcukaitobi on his feet on behalf of Xolobeni and LAMOSA amici at the Itereleng eviction application —> pic.twitter.com/yv6kq68xnl
	ಫೋಟೋ ನೋಡಿ ·

	LARC @LarcUCT	8 ಗಂ.
	Adv de Vos: the lease agreement that gave the land rights of the families to the mining company is invalid because the people that had rights to the land gave no consent #concourt #Wilgespruit
	ಸ್ಥಳ ನೋಡಿ ·